5700 ultra vs. geforce3 ti200

Well perhaps the 5900 ultra prices will come down now to close to $250.00,
now that the 5950 is out. That may be the card to get -- a lower priced
5900 ultra.

I don't think I like the sound of the XT, which sounds like lower
performance. I've seen some benchmarks where the 5700 ultra came close to
the 5900 xt.

"Darthy" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 14:59:34 -0500, "Eric" wrote:

I'm confused with all the nvidia names: 5900 ultra; 5900 xt ; 5950

What is the diff between 5900 ultra and 5900xt?

About $150 and 15fps faster. XT is slower... a great card to get for
$185~200!!

Shows what crap the 5600 and 5700s are that ARE STILL selling for
$175~200!!!



--
Remember when real men used Real computers!?
When 512K of video RAM was a lot!

Death to Palladium & WPA!!

On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 14:44:15 -0500, "Eric" wrote:

Well perhaps the 5900 ultra prices will come down now to close to $250.00,
now that the 5950 is out. That may be the card to get -- a lower priced
5900 ultra.

I don't think I like the sound of the XT, which sounds like lower
performance. I've seen some benchmarks where the 5700 ultra came close to
the 5900 xt.

Read this:
http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic...charts-05.html


--
Remember when real men used Real computers!?
When 512K of video RAM was a lot!

Death to Palladium & WPA!!

As I pointed out, the 5700 ultra comes somewhat close to the 5900 XT (but
the XT does win).

What is the diff between the 5900 XT and the plain old 5900?

"Darthy" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 14:44:15 -0500, "Eric" wrote:

Well perhaps the 5900 ultra prices will come down now to close to
$250.00,
now that the 5950 is out. That may be the card to get -- a lower priced
5900 ultra.

I don't think I like the sound of the XT, which sounds like lower
performance. I've seen some benchmarks where the 5700 ultra came close
to
the 5900 xt.

Read this:
http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic...charts-05.html


--
Remember when real men used Real computers!?
When 512K of video RAM was a lot!

Death to Palladium & WPA!!

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:57:20 -0500, "Eric" wrote:

As I pointed out, the 5700 ultra comes somewhat close to the 5900 XT (but
the XT does win).

What is the diff between the 5900 XT and the plain old 5900?

I provided a weblink to a complete article, go to PAGE 1, it has
everything there you asked for.


"Darthy" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 14:44:15 -0500, "Eric" wrote:

Well perhaps the 5900 ultra prices will come down now to close to
$250.00,
now that the 5950 is out. That may be the card to get -- a lower priced
5900 ultra.

I don't think I like the sound of the XT, which sounds like lower
performance. I've seen some benchmarks where the 5700 ultra came close
to
the 5900 xt.

Read this:
http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic...charts-05.html


--
Remember when real men used Real computers!?
When 512K of video RAM was a lot!

Death to Palladium & WPA!!



--
Remember when real men used Real computers!?
When 512K of video RAM was a lot!

Death to Palladium & WPA!!