If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cost-effective Quad core system
I've been trying to configure a second system using PCI boards. Since
I'll need as many slots as possible, the GA-P35-S3G was recommended. (I haven't been able to locate a similar ASUS board---does anything exist?) I'd be using the system for downloads, background processing, etc. so I'm considering: GIGABYTE GA-P35-S3G LGA 775 $75 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...Tpk=GA-P35-DS3 Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz $220 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115017 Kingston 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 (PC2 8500) $80 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820134655 A couple points that I'd like to clarify: Does anyone make equivalent RAM in 2GB package? It would be nice to save the other two slots. Any compelling reason to go with the Quad Q9300 Yorkfield? It's $280, and I didn't think the faster FSB would merit that. But not sure. AND...I have Matrox P650 AGP video cards. I'm not a gamer, so I don't need anything faster. And the P650 occupies only one slot, and doesn't need a fan. Unfortunately the Gigabyte motherboard does not have an AGP slot. Anything come to mind re video boards? Random speculation welcome. PS: The only AGP-based motherboards that I found for Quad were ASRock. I have no idea what to expect there. Plus I think their RAM maxes out at 2GB. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813157115 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Cost-effective Quad core system
I've been trying to configure a second system using PCI boards. Since I'll need as many slots as possible, the GA-P35-S3G was recommended. (I haven't been able to locate a similar ASUS board---does anything exist?) I'd be using the system for downloads, background processing, etc. so I'm considering: GIGABYTE GA-P35-S3G LGA 775 $75 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...Tpk=GA-P35-DS3 Yeah I like this mobo too but no longer sales in many my local shops...even online shop not have anymore...I think outdate already... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Cost-effective Quad core system
R wrote:
I've been trying to configure a second system using PCI boards. Since I'll need as many slots as possible, the GA-P35-S3G was recommended. (I haven't been able to locate a similar ASUS board---does anything exist?) I'd be using the system for downloads, background processing, etc. so I'm considering: GIGABYTE GA-P35-S3G LGA 775 $75 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...Tpk=GA-P35-DS3 Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz $220 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115017 Kingston 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 (PC2 8500) $80 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820134655 A couple points that I'd like to clarify: Does anyone make equivalent RAM in 2GB package? It would be nice to save the other two slots. Any compelling reason to go with the Quad Q9300 Yorkfield? It's $280, and I didn't think the faster FSB would merit that. But not sure. AND...I have Matrox P650 AGP video cards. I'm not a gamer, so I don't need anything faster. And the P650 occupies only one slot, and doesn't need a fan. Unfortunately the Gigabyte motherboard does not have an AGP slot. Anything come to mind re video boards? Random speculation welcome. PS: The only AGP-based motherboards that I found for Quad were ASRock. I have no idea what to expect there. Plus I think their RAM maxes out at 2GB. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813157115 Is this the Gigabyte board with the five PCI slots you were interested in ? It looks like it is still in stock. (GA-P35-S3G $75) http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128084 The best overclocking bang for bucks, is supposed to be the Q6600. The Q9300 is FSB1333, so not as much room to overclock it. The Q6600 G0 draws 95W, so it'll get a bit warm. The Q9300 appears to be the same power rating. http://processorfinder.intel.com/det...px?sSpec=SLAWE (Q9300) http://processorfinder.intel.com/det...px?sSpec=SLACR (Q6600) You can buy 2GB sized modules - just look through the Newegg memory listing for some. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...ubcategory=147 Paul |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Cost-effective Quad core system
On Wed, 14 May 2008 02:49:36 -0400, Paul wrote:
R wrote: I've been trying to configure a second system using PCI boards. Since I'll need as many slots as possible, the GA-P35-S3G was recommended. (I haven't been able to locate a similar ASUS board---does anything exist?) .... Does anyone make equivalent RAM in 2GB package? It would be nice to save the other two slots. Is this the Gigabyte board with the five PCI slots you were interested in ? It looks like it is still in stock. (GA-P35-S3G $75) http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128084 Yes, in fact it is, Paul. I had posted the wrong URL. I'm also starting to think that I may be able to get by without as many normal PCI slots, as the new boards have gigabit ethernet, lots of USB ports, etc. So I may opt for 3 PCI + a few PCI-e's. That would also put things back in the park for Asus, which is the brand I've used for years. Not sure how Giigabyte compares. The best overclocking bang for bucks, is supposed to be the Q6600. The Q9300 is FSB1333, so not as much room to overclock it. The Q6600 G0 draws 95W, so it'll get a bit warm. The Q9300 appears to be the same power rating. http://processorfinder.intel.com/det...px?sSpec=SLAWE (Q9300) http://processorfinder.intel.com/det...px?sSpec=SLACR (Q6600) Slightly more cache on the Q6600 too. I'm not an overclocker, but I guess the 6600 is more cost-effective anyway. Nice to know that there's something in reserve if I need it. You can buy 2GB sized modules - just look through the Newegg memory listing for some. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...ubcategory=147 Thanks. Looks like Newegg makes a good search engine. g Any opinions on the lower cost RAM? I think your page indicates that would be Mushkin vs OCZ vs Geil. Unless you do this constantly, it's tough to relate specs for timing and voltage, etc back to real-world performance. If there's a difference in reliability, that's generally the thing that tips the scales for me. But all three of those brands have good reviews on that page. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Cost-effective Quad core system
R wrote:
Thanks. Looks like Newegg makes a good search engine. g Any opinions on the lower cost RAM? I think your page indicates that would be Mushkin vs OCZ vs Geil. Unless you do this constantly, it's tough to relate specs for timing and voltage, etc back to real-world performance. If there's a difference in reliability, that's generally the thing that tips the scales for me. But all three of those brands have good reviews on that page. About all I can suggest, is to check the customer reviews. That will give some idea as to how many DOA sticks there were, or early problems with errors and the like. If I needed more user feedback, I might have a look here. If their search engine is not working, you can always use an external search engine that supports domain specific searches. (The one I use, is the second link.) http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/ http://www.altavista.com/web/adv Paul |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Asus vs Gigabyte
Not trying to start a bar fight. I was ready to buy a new Asus
motherboard, but noticed some comments about them on some of the tech sites. Looks like Asus has a bit of smoke in the cockpit as of late. Some say that Gigabyte is now a better bet (yeah, it's always a gamble), but to be fair, I've seen other comments that say "Asus is getting as bad as Gigabyte." Again, I know I'm just playing the odds, but is there any truth in comments about Gigabyte having any edge in quality of components, etc.? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Asus vs Gigabyte
"R" wrote in message ... Not trying to start a bar fight. I was ready to buy a new Asus motherboard, but noticed some comments about them on some of the tech sites. Looks like Asus has a bit of smoke in the cockpit as of late. Some say that Gigabyte is now a better bet (yeah, it's always a gamble), but to be fair, I've seen other comments that say "Asus is getting as bad as Gigabyte." Again, I know I'm just playing the odds, but is there any truth in comments about Gigabyte having any edge in quality of components, etc.? I've had both and currently running a Gigabyte Ga-P35-DS4 rev 2.0 and to be honest I think both have their problems. I think I'm going to try DFI next. I have heard some really positive things about both DFI and EVGA. Good Luck Tim |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Asus vs Gigabyte
On Sun, 18 May 2008 18:34:31 -0700, "Tim S." wrote:
"R" wrote in message .. . Not trying to start a bar fight. I was ready to buy a new Asus motherboard, but noticed some comments about them on some of the tech sites. Looks like Asus has a bit of smoke in the cockpit as of late. Some say that Gigabyte is now a better bet (yeah, it's always a gamble), but to be fair, I've seen other comments that say "Asus is getting as bad as Gigabyte." Again, I know I'm just playing the odds, but is there any truth in comments about Gigabyte having any edge in quality of components, etc.? I've had both and currently running a Gigabyte Ga-P35-DS4 rev 2.0 and to be honest I think both have their problems. I think I'm going to try DFI next. I have heard some really positive things about both DFI and EVGA. Good Luck Tim That doesn't sound promising. I've used Asus for many years, and always had faith in their quality. Now they seem to be trending toward the same mass-produced low-quality that characterized their competition in the past. You have to wonder why they would not try to maintain their distinct spot in the marketplace. I was hoping to choose by feature set, but the comments about quality lapse of Asus put a different spin on things. Given the disastrous consequences of motherboard failure, I will definitely spend more for some insurance. And forego a few ports or whatever. So, are DFI and EVGA the way to go? Anyone? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Asus vs Gigabyte
"R" wrote in message news On Sun, 18 May 2008 18:34:31 -0700, "Tim S." wrote: "R" wrote in message . .. Not trying to start a bar fight. I was ready to buy a new Asus motherboard, but noticed some comments about them on some of the tech sites. Looks like Asus has a bit of smoke in the cockpit as of late. Some say that Gigabyte is now a better bet (yeah, it's always a gamble), but to be fair, I've seen other comments that say "Asus is getting as bad as Gigabyte." Again, I know I'm just playing the odds, but is there any truth in comments about Gigabyte having any edge in quality of components, etc.? I've had both and currently running a Gigabyte Ga-P35-DS4 rev 2.0 and to be honest I think both have their problems. I think I'm going to try DFI next. I have heard some really positive things about both DFI and EVGA. Good Luck Tim That doesn't sound promising. I've used Asus for many years, and always had faith in their quality. Now they seem to be trending toward the same mass-produced low-quality that characterized their competition in the past. You have to wonder why they would not try to maintain their distinct spot in the marketplace. I was hoping to choose by feature set, but the comments about quality lapse of Asus put a different spin on things. Given the disastrous consequences of motherboard failure, I will definitely spend more for some insurance. And forego a few ports or whatever. So, are DFI and EVGA the way to go? Anyone? Check out the Motherboard reviews on www.newegg.com Maybe that could ease some of your fears. Tim |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Asus vs Gigabyte
"Tim S." wrote:
"R" wrote in message .. . Not trying to start a bar fight. I was ready to buy a new Asus motherboard, but noticed some comments about them on some of the tech sites. Looks like Asus has a bit of smoke in the cockpit as of late. Some say that Gigabyte is now a better bet (yeah, it's always a gamble), but to be fair, I've seen other comments that say "Asus is getting as bad as Gigabyte." Again, I know I'm just playing the odds, but is there any truth in comments about Gigabyte having any edge in quality of components, etc.? I've had both and currently running a Gigabyte Ga-P35-DS4 rev 2.0 and to be honest I think both have their problems. I am running the same board with an Intel 6750 and have had no problems in 6 months. Would you care to describe the problems with the Gigabyte board that you are aware of? Monty |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should I go Dual Core or Quad Core? Intel C2 DUO E6850 vs. Quad-Core Q6600 | Brian Cryer | Nvidia Videocards | 4 | January 16th 08 10:23 PM |
Should I go Dual Core or Quad Core? Intel C2 DUO E6850 vs. Quad-Core Q6600 | Bob Fry | Nvidia Videocards | 17 | January 9th 08 09:22 AM |
Should I go Dual Core or Quad Core? Intel C2 DUO E6850 vs. Quad-Core Q6600 | Bob Fry | Ati Videocards | 17 | January 9th 08 09:22 AM |
Should I go Dual Core or Quad Core? Intel C2 DUO E6850 vs. Quad-Core Q6600 | Patrick Vervoorn | Ati Videocards | 1 | January 3rd 08 09:10 PM |
Most cost effective system for Beowulfing? | AN O'Nymous | General | 0 | February 15th 06 07:09 PM |