If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ATI 9600 or nVidia 5600?
Which one of these cards is better for general use and game playing?
Cheers. Bobby |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I got rid of a FX5600-256mg..did not like it at all..my Ti4200 was
better..replaced it with a Raedon 9600XT..way better |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:21:36 -0000, "Bobby" wrote:
Which one of these cards is better for general use and game playing? Cheers. Bobby no contest http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic...charts-09.html Have a great day, Albert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Like most nVidia/ATi questions, this comes down to personal preference. I
prefer the nVidia over the competing ATi card. Seeing as how this _IS_ comp.perhips.videocards.nvidia...what would you expect? :P Statistically no contest. "Bobby" wrote in message ... Which one of these cards is better for general use and game playing? Cheers. Bobby |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I was the same until they built their FX series of cards..7 Nvidia based
cards...until the FX5600 turned out to be junk...all the specs pointed to ATI..so I tried it....still have 2 Nvidia cards that I will not get rid of unless they burn out.A G3Ti200 and a G4Ti4200. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:21:36 -0000, "Bobby" wrote:
Which one of these cards is better for general use and game playing? 9600Pro hands down... If under $150. http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic...ournament_2003 For about $180, I'd get the fx5900-XT. -- Remember when real men used Real computers!? When 512K of video RAM was a lot! Death to Palladium & WPA!! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
He didn't say pro in his subject line though, the np is a slower card than
the pro... "Darthy" wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:21:36 -0000, "Bobby" wrote: Which one of these cards is better for general use and game playing? 9600Pro hands down... If under $150. http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic...ournament_2003 For about $180, I'd get the fx5900-XT. -- Remember when real men used Real computers!? When 512K of video RAM was a lot! Death to Palladium & WPA!! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Really, no ****?
If he hunts around, he can get a 9600Pro for about $130~150... about the same price as a 9600. The 9600se (ATI's fx5200) is $95~130! On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:37:49 GMT, "Mike P" wrote: He didn't say pro in his subject line though, the np is a slower card than the pro... "Darthy" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:21:36 -0000, "Bobby" wrote: Which one of these cards is better for general use and game playing? 9600Pro hands down... If under $150. http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic...ournament_2003 For about $180, I'd get the fx5900-XT. -- Remember when real men used Real computers!? When 512K of video RAM was a lot! Death to Palladium & WPA!! -- Remember when real men used Real computers!? When 512K of video RAM was a lot! Death to Palladium & WPA!! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bad news for ATI: Nvidia to 'own' ATI at CeBit - no pixel shader 3.0 support in R420 (long) | NV55 | Ati Videocards | 12 | February 24th 04 06:29 AM |
Problems with NVIDIA FX GO 5600 and SuSE Linux 8.2 | Alexander Deckert | Nvidia Videocards | 2 | January 6th 04 11:35 PM |
9600 (non pro) vs 5600 (non ultra) | Sir Basil | Nvidia Videocards | 6 | November 15th 03 12:10 PM |
I dont see that nvidia is "finished"... | Steven C \(Doktersteve\) | Ati Videocards | 17 | September 13th 03 09:00 PM |
nVidia 5600 Ultra v. ATI Radeon 9600 | Christoph | General | 1 | June 27th 03 07:16 PM |