If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
nVidia QuadroFX for games?
Hi,
I need some informations about the quadroFX series and games. Are the quadroFX series better (faster) than the 'default' nvidia series (because they're more for professional use (cad, ...))? Is there a good website for quadroFX benchmarks with games and other graphicboards? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
H. Jvrg wrote:
Hi, I need some informations about the quadroFX series and games. Are the quadroFX series better (faster) than the 'default' nvidia series (because they're more for professional use (cad, ...))? Is there a good website for quadroFX benchmarks with games and other graphicboards? Quadros are more for legacy rendering, not realtime rendering. They can do it, I just don't think it will be as good as if you had a Geforce. The drivers control performance in this area, since the 5900 and Quadro 3000 use a similar GPU. You can use RivaTuner to turn your Geforce into any model card (only lower or equal versions, you can't go any higher). The same will work for any Quadro. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"H. Jörg" wrote in message
... Hi, I need some informations about the quadroFX series and games. Are the quadroFX series better (faster) than the 'default' nvidia series (because they're more for professional use (cad, ...))? Is there a good website for quadroFX benchmarks with games and other graphicboards? The QuadraFX is basically the same as the GeforceFX, chip for chip... that being said, the Quadra accelerates a subset of GL functions that are disabled in the Geforce, but unless you are using a specific set of applications you will _not_ notice any discernable difference. Tim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
t thome wrote:
"H. Jvrg" wrote in message ... Hi, I need some informations about the quadroFX series and games. Are the quadroFX series better (faster) than the 'default' nvidia series (because they're more for professional use (cad, ...))? Is there a good website for quadroFX benchmarks with games and other graphicboards? The QuadraFX is basically the same as the GeforceFX, chip for chip... that being said, the Quadra accelerates a subset of GL functions that are disabled in the Geforce, but unless you are using a specific set of applications you will not notice any discernable difference. Tim Not to mention the drivers... Different professional applications require different drivers for optimal performance. None of the rendering software out there has been tested with or supports the nv56.xx drivers. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"teqguy" wrote in message
... t thome wrote: "H. Jvrg" wrote in message ... Hi, I need some informations about the quadroFX series and games. Are the quadroFX series better (faster) than the 'default' nvidia series (because they're more for professional use (cad, ...))? Is there a good website for quadroFX benchmarks with games and other graphicboards? The QuadraFX is basically the same as the GeforceFX, chip for chip... that being said, the Quadra accelerates a subset of GL functions that are disabled in the Geforce, but unless you are using a specific set of applications you will not notice any discernable difference. Tim Not to mention the drivers... Different professional applications require different drivers for optimal performance. None of the rendering software out there has been tested with or supports the nv56.xx drivers. You raise a good point. It's not the rendering software, but the real-time use of the modeling software... and driver stability and compatability are important. The driver package is pretty much the same, except that the app vendors work closely with nVidia to ensure that extra degree of stability. In a production environment, down-time due to driver bugs can be big money... Tim |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Very few sites test Quadro cards with games. (The defunct 3DPulpit is the
only one to come to mind.) When nVidia sends out a card for press use, the company expects the benchmarks used to be relevant to the card's target customer base. But no, you won't see any substantial differences between Quadro and Geforce, as they essentially share the same processor design. There might be small differences due to different clock speeds. The Quadro also has better sub-pixel precision, so FSAA quality might be a slight bit better, but nothing worth the crazy price premium the Quadro commands (for gamers, that is). -- First of One Formula SAE Racing: http://fsae.utoronto.ca/ "H. Jörg" wrote in message ... Hi, I need some informations about the quadroFX series and games. Are the quadroFX series better (faster) than the 'default' nvidia series (because they're more for professional use (cad, ...))? Is there a good website for quadroFX benchmarks with games and other graphicboards? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pc problems after g card upgrade + sp2 | ben reed | Homebuilt PC's | 9 | November 30th 04 01:04 AM |
Bad news for ATI: Nvidia to 'own' ATI at CeBit - no pixel shader 3.0 support in R420 (long) | NV55 | Ati Videocards | 12 | February 24th 04 06:29 AM |
Bad news for ATI: Nvidia to 'own' ATI at CeBit - no pixel shader 3.0 support in R420 (long) | NV55 | Nvidia Videocards | 11 | February 24th 04 06:29 AM |
Kyle Bennett (HardOCP) blasts NVIDIA | Radeon350 | Nvidia Videocards | 19 | August 14th 03 09:46 PM |
Kyle Bennett (HardOCP) blasts NVIDIA | Radeon350 | Ati Videocards | 12 | August 13th 03 09:19 PM |