why can't I access Tom's Hardware?

Everytime I try, I get either a blank page or 404 error. I've been trying
for weeks.

--
McQualude

Who cares?

McQualude wrote:
Everytime I try, I get either a blank page or 404 error. I've been
trying for weeks.

McQualude wrote:

Everytime I try, I get either a blank page or 404 error. I've been trying
for weeks.

Try clearing your DNS cache.


--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

Some AMD fanboy, no doubt, got ****ed off and downed THG for their recent
bold criticisms of Athlon64 and the 'sixty-four bit hype'.

--
Doug Whitesell
all your base are belong to us

"McQualude" wrote in message
...
Everytime I try, I get either a blank page or 404 error. I've been trying
for weeks.

--
McQualude

Some AMD fanboy, no doubt, got ****ed off and downed THG for their recent
bold criticisms of Athlon64 and the 'sixty-four bit hype'.

What's not to like? AMD has the fastest chip at the cheapest price. They
beat Intel at every level. Heck, Newegg has had the 2500 XP on sale for 90
bucks for a month now. What Intel chip even comes close to offering that
kind of bang for the buck? Face it, Intel is a bloated media hound. If
they'd spend more money on R&D than advertising, they'd be on to something.

I am an AMD fanboy and I agree with all the Intel-bashing you have done
so far.

--
Doug Whitesell
all your base are belong to us
"Mr. Brian Allen" wrote in message
...
Some AMD fanboy, no doubt, got ****ed off and downed THG for their
recent
bold criticisms of Athlon64 and the 'sixty-four bit hype'.

What's not to like? AMD has the fastest chip at the cheapest price. They
beat Intel at every level. Heck, Newegg has had the 2500 XP on sale for
90
bucks for a month now. What Intel chip even comes close to offering that
kind of bang for the buck? Face it, Intel is a bloated media hound. If
they'd spend more money on R&D than advertising, they'd be on to
something.

Whatever's wrong, you're being done a favor.

Not a Tom's Hardware fan? :-p I like some of their peripheral reviews and
video card benchmarks.

Look again. The 2500+ Barton is now $80.

Dave


"Mr. Brian Allen" wrote in message
...
Some AMD fanboy, no doubt, got ****ed off and downed THG for their
recent
bold criticisms of Athlon64 and the 'sixty-four bit hype'.

What's not to like? AMD has the fastest chip at the cheapest price. They
beat Intel at every level. Heck, Newegg has had the 2500 XP on sale for
90
bucks for a month now. What Intel chip even comes close to offering that
kind of bang for the buck? Face it, Intel is a bloated media hound. If
they'd spend more money on R&D than advertising, they'd be on to
something.

The only problem I have with THG is their useless overclocking with liquid
nitrogen. They are trying to say it's a big deal that they were able to
overclock a P4 to 5Ghz. Ok, I could understand if they used a little more
practical means of doing so. How many of you have liquid nitrogen sitting
around in the garage? Or can just go out and buy an endless supply to keep
your P4 at 5Ghz? Plain retarded.
--
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ @2150Mhz
MSI K8T NEO FIS2R
Geil Dual DDR 400Mhz Ultra Set, 2x512MB
PNY Verto GeForce FX 5900 SE (core-459Mhz, memory-967Mhz)
Maxtor 160GB SATA 7200 8MB
"jaeger" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

Not a Tom's Hardware fan? :-p I like some of their peripheral reviews
and
video card benchmarks.

Ha, don't get me started. It was OK back in 1996 or so, when Tom
actually wrote good stuff. Now that a bunch of German teenagers write
everything it's useless. The reviews are sloppy, inaccurate, use
totally incorrect methodology, draw conclusions that have no bearing on
any of the previous pages, and often contradict themselves paragraph to
paragraph. I could write a book on why it sucks. Of course you can say
all of this about 99% of all the hardware sites out there, but
unsuspecting innocents are constantly lured to the THG "name value". I
wrote this on Anandtech (which, incidentally, is also circling the bowl)
two years ago, and it's only gotten worse:

http://tinyurl.com/2n8xr

Now there's a useful post!

dd

"neopolaris" . wrote in message ...
Who cares?

McQualude wrote:
Everytime I try, I get either a blank page or 404 error. I've been
trying for weeks.