If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
flash bios
Can anybody tell me were I can locate the bios that upgrades
a 5900 ultra to a 5950. Thanks PZ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 16:16:02 GMT, "Peter Zademack"
wrote: Can anybody tell me were I can locate the bios that upgrades a 5900 ultra to a 5950. Thanks PZ And why would you want a BIOS that relaxes the memory timing on your board such that the memory actually runs slower, regardless of clock rate. The BIOS also increases the core voltage by about 0.2v, which should increase the GPU stable clock speed by 3% or less over that available when overclocking with Coolbits, given my experience with vcore adjustment of CPUs on the 0.13u process. The 5950 BIOS is tailored to the specs of the components on the 5950 board. What you are trying to do is like adding a turbo to a stock engine without any changes to the compression ratio, manifolds and exhaust system. You also run the risk of turning your board into a door-stop, as somebody else on this newsgroup has apparently already done. John Lewis |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
thank for your advice,john I will certaily consider your points.
PZ "John Lewis" wrote in message ... On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 16:16:02 GMT, "Peter Zademack" wrote: Can anybody tell me were I can locate the bios that upgrades a 5900 ultra to a 5950. Thanks PZ And why would you want a BIOS that relaxes the memory timing on your board such that the memory actually runs slower, regardless of clock rate. The BIOS also increases the core voltage by about 0.2v, which should increase the GPU stable clock speed by 3% or less over that available when overclocking with Coolbits, given my experience with vcore adjustment of CPUs on the 0.13u process. The 5950 BIOS is tailored to the specs of the components on the 5950 board. What you are trying to do is like adding a turbo to a stock engine without any changes to the compression ratio, manifolds and exhaust system. You also run the risk of turning your board into a door-stop, as somebody else on this newsgroup has apparently already done. John Lewis |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Here you can find how to change your fx 5900 to fx 5950:
http://www.3dchips.co.kr/main/gzrevi...&Page=1&no =1 I have the MSI FX 5900 but I am not sure I want to try that for the same reason that John told you. The guy who wrote the article insists that he tried it on various fx 5900 cards without any problem but in some cases you must change the cooling system of your card in order to cope with the increasing temperature. Sotirios "Peter Zademack" wrote in message news:4XMVb.262554$na.420445@attbi_s04... thank for your advice,john I will certaily consider your points. PZ "John Lewis" wrote in message ... On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 16:16:02 GMT, "Peter Zademack" wrote: Can anybody tell me were I can locate the bios that upgrades a 5900 ultra to a 5950. Thanks PZ And why would you want a BIOS that relaxes the memory timing on your board such that the memory actually runs slower, regardless of clock rate. The BIOS also increases the core voltage by about 0.2v, which should increase the GPU stable clock speed by 3% or less over that available when overclocking with Coolbits, given my experience with vcore adjustment of CPUs on the 0.13u process. The 5950 BIOS is tailored to the specs of the components on the 5950 board. What you are trying to do is like adding a turbo to a stock engine without any changes to the compression ratio, manifolds and exhaust system. You also run the risk of turning your board into a door-stop, as somebody else on this newsgroup has apparently already done. John Lewis |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"ProphetX" wrote in message ... Here you can find how to change your fx 5900 to fx 5950: http://www.3dchips.co.kr/main/gzrevi...&Page=1&no =1 I have the MSI FX 5900 but I am not sure I want to try that for the same reason that John told you. The guy who wrote the article insists that he tried it on various fx 5900 cards without any problem but in some cases you must change the cooling system of your card in order to cope with the increasing temperature. Sotirios "Peter Zademack" wrote in message news:4XMVb.262554$na.420445@attbi_s04... thank for your advice,john I will certaily consider your points. PZ "John Lewis" wrote in message ... On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 16:16:02 GMT, "Peter Zademack" wrote: Can anybody tell me were I can locate the bios that upgrades a 5900 ultra to a 5950. Thanks PZ And why would you want a BIOS that relaxes the memory timing on your board such that the memory actually runs slower, regardless of clock rate. The BIOS also increases the core voltage by about 0.2v, which should increase the GPU stable clock speed by 3% or less over that available when overclocking with Coolbits, given my experience with vcore adjustment of CPUs on the 0.13u process. The 5950 BIOS is tailored to the specs of the components on the 5950 board. What you are trying to do is like adding a turbo to a stock engine without any changes to the compression ratio, manifolds and exhaust system. You also run the risk of turning your board into a door-stop, as somebody else on this newsgroup has apparently already done. John Lewis The only thing the flashing can do is "hard-set" the core/mem clocks and possibly has relaxed timings on the mem. The volts for the FX line are controlled by resistors soldered on to the PCB. It would be physically impossible for the flash to change the voltages powering the core and/or mem. Mike G --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 2/6/2004 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:43:57 GMT, "ginfest"
wrote: The only thing the flashing can do is "hard-set" the core/mem clocks and possibly has relaxed timings on the mem. The volts for the FX line are controlled by resistors soldered on to the PCB. It would be physically impossible for the flash to change the voltages powering the core and/or mem. You are certain that the core-regulator on a 5950 board does not have soft voltage control a la the CPUs ? You have the circuits of the nVidia 5900 reference-design and you don't see any soft-voltage capability ? If you have the circuits, then I would like a copy ! Anyway, the exact overclock of a 5900 board is luck-of-the-draw. Mine overclocks at 475/925 and could go higher, but having done peak temp measurements (correctly !), I decided that the above was the limit for silicon longetivity. John Lewis Mike G --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 2/6/2004 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"John Lewis" wrote in message ... On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:43:57 GMT, "ginfest" wrote: The only thing the flashing can do is "hard-set" the core/mem clocks and possibly has relaxed timings on the mem. The volts for the FX line are controlled by resistors soldered on to the PCB. It would be physically impossible for the flash to change the voltages powering the core and/or mem. You are certain that the core-regulator on a 5950 board does not have soft voltage control a la the CPUs ? You have the circuits of the nVidia 5900 reference-design and you don't see any soft-voltage capability ? If you have the circuits, then I would like a copy ! I don't have the NV reference board circuit design schematics but am basing my opinion on the following: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...extreme_5.html http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...extreme_6.html The 1st link (page 5) does comfirm the existence of a "two-phase voltage regulator ", the 2nd (page 6) states that "By connecting a resistor between the OFS input and the common wire, it is possible to increase the output voltage of the regulator...OFS output of the ISL6569 chip is connected in the MSI card with the common wire through a chain of resistors with zero resistance." There are also schematics (click each to magnify) which show the layout. A quick perusal of my BFG FX 5900 nu shows a similar layout. Anyway, my interpretation may be wrong and I'd be happy to consider your interpretation of the above pages as an alternative. Anyway, the exact overclock of a 5900 board is luck-of-the-draw. Mine overclocks at 475/925 and could go higher, but having done peak temp measurements (correctly !), I decided that the above was the limit for silicon longetivity. My 5900 does 475/950 and has run at this rate for months. It's an early August board, shortly after they were released (late July ?) although it has the "Chaintech" style dual-fan/blue LED and "gold" colored heatsink rather than the black/single-fan ref cooler on the Ultras. Using RivaTuners logging facility my board averages mid-60s C under load. I noticed your recommendations for getting an accurate load temp but the RT method takes the rapid cooldown "factor" out of the equation. John Lewis Mike G --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.581 / Virus Database: 368 - Release Date: 2/9/2004 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:57:01 GMT, "ginfest"
wrote: "John Lewis" wrote in message ... On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:43:57 GMT, "ginfest" wrote: The only thing the flashing can do is "hard-set" the core/mem clocks and possibly has relaxed timings on the mem. The volts for the FX line are controlled by resistors soldered on to the PCB. It would be physically impossible for the flash to change the voltages powering the core and/or mem. You are certain that the core-regulator on a 5950 board does not have soft voltage control a la the CPUs ? You have the circuits of the nVidia 5900 reference-design and you don't see any soft-voltage capability ? If you have the circuits, then I would like a copy ! I don't have the NV reference board circuit design schematics but am basing my opinion on the following: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...extreme_5.html http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...extreme_6.html The 1st link (page 5) does comfirm the existence of a "two-phase voltage regulator ", the 2nd (page 6) states that "By connecting a resistor between the OFS input and the common wire, it is possible to increase the output voltage of the regulator...OFS output of the ISL6569 chip is connected in the MSI card with the common wire through a chain of resistors with zero resistance." There are also schematics (click each to magnify) which show the layout. A quick perusal of my BFG FX 5900 nu shows a similar layout. Anyway, my interpretation may be wrong and I'd be happy to consider your interpretation of the above pages as an alternative. The article clearly states the GPU's ability to soft-control the voltage regulator. The 5900 and 5950 GPU BIOS do control that voltage ( with the 5950 BIOS presumably changing the appropriate codes to raise the volts by 0.2v). The above article pages 5 and 6 shows the hack that was applied to get the same effect without changing the BIOS. Thanks for pointing out this very interesting article. John Lewis |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Old P/I-P55TP4XE BIOS flash problems | Erick Ondich | Asus Motherboards | 2 | December 6th 04 02:43 PM |
7VTXH+ - Bad BIOS Flash | Orange Barrel | Gigabyte Motherboards | 0 | September 29th 04 01:08 PM |
flash gigabyte bios | Krzysztof M. | General | 5 | September 25th 04 11:55 PM |
GA-7N400 Pro BIOS flash help needed | Bill Larcombe | Gigabyte Motherboards | 2 | June 11th 04 05:41 PM |
A7V333-X new BIOS 1004 | Paul | Asus Motherboards | 4 | June 26th 03 12:08 PM |