If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SB Live! and Mixer "Audio CD" slider problem
Hello !
On a freshly installed XP (sp2), I have a SB Live! 5.1 sound card and installed the 5.12.2.252 drivers. The PC has two optical disks devices, a DVD-ROM and a DVD writer. There's an audio cable between the DVD-ROM and the Audio-CD connector on the card, and another connecting the DVD writer to the Aux connector on the card. Despite this, when I put in an Audio CD, it is the WAVE/MP3 slider of the Creative (or XP) mixer which control the volume. Both "Audio CD" and "Aux" sliders seems inoperative. Why is it so ? How can I make the appropriate slider control the Audio CD volume ? Thanks.. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
SB Live! and Mixer "Audio CD" slider problem
Louis wrote:
Hello ! On a freshly installed XP (sp2), I have a SB Live! 5.1 sound card and installed the 5.12.2.252 drivers. The PC has two optical disks devices, a DVD-ROM and a DVD writer. There's an audio cable between the DVD-ROM and the Audio-CD connector on the card, and another connecting the DVD writer to the Aux connector on the card. Despite this, when I put in an Audio CD, it is the WAVE/MP3 slider of the Creative (or XP) mixer which control the volume. Both "Audio CD" and "Aux" sliders seems inoperative. Why is it so ? How can I make the appropriate slider control the Audio CD volume ? Since this is a fresh install of XP I think digital audio extraction enabled by default, which according to this MS KB article would cause what you are experiencing with the mixer volumes. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/271647 HTH Eddie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
SB Live! and Mixer "Audio CD" slider problem
E a formulé la demande :
Louis wrote: Hello ! On a freshly installed XP (sp2), I have a SB Live! 5.1 sound card and installed the 5.12.2.252 drivers. The PC has two optical disks devices, a DVD-ROM and a DVD writer. There's an audio cable between the DVD-ROM and the Audio-CD connector on the card, and another connecting the DVD writer to the Aux connector on the card. Despite this, when I put in an Audio CD, it is the WAVE/MP3 slider of the Creative (or XP) mixer which control the volume. Both "Audio CD" and "Aux" sliders seems inoperative. Why is it so ? How can I make the appropriate slider control the Audio CD volume ? Since this is a fresh install of XP I think digital audio extraction enabled by default, which according to this MS KB article would cause what you are experiencing with the mixer volumes. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/271647 HTH Eddie That's was it ! Changed from "Digital" to "Analog" on device properties and wmp and everything works as expected. Thanks.. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
SB Live! and Mixer "Audio CD" slider problem
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:27:51 -0400, Louis
wrote: E a formulé la demande : Louis wrote: Hello ! On a freshly installed XP (sp2), I have a SB Live! 5.1 sound card and installed the 5.12.2.252 drivers. The PC has two optical disks devices, a DVD-ROM and a DVD writer. There's an audio cable between the DVD-ROM and the Audio-CD connector on the card, and another connecting the DVD writer to the Aux connector on the card. Despite this, when I put in an Audio CD, it is the WAVE/MP3 slider of the Creative (or XP) mixer which control the volume. Both "Audio CD" and "Aux" sliders seems inoperative. Why is it so ? How can I make the appropriate slider control the Audio CD volume ? Since this is a fresh install of XP I think digital audio extraction enabled by default, which according to this MS KB article would cause what you are experiencing with the mixer volumes. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/271647 HTH Eddie That's was it ! Changed from "Digital" to "Analog" on device properties and wmp and everything works as expected. Ok but why would you want to transfer analog data over the cable when it should sound better uninstalling the cables and transferring the audio (data) over the data cable for OS decoding and playback or *recording* (converting to a new file)? Perhaps you do want to but for typical listening scenarios you would just check the (Device Manager) properties for the optical drive and make sure the digital audio connector box is checkmarked. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
SB Live! and Mixer "Audio CD" slider problem
kony wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:27:51 -0400, Louis wrote: E a formulé la demande : Louis wrote: snip That's was it ! Changed from "Digital" to "Analog" on device properties and wmp and everything works as expected. Ok but why would you want to transfer analog data over the cable when it should sound better uninstalling the cables and transferring the audio (data) over the data cable for OS decoding and playback or *recording* (converting to a new file)? Perhaps you do want to but for typical listening scenarios you would just check the (Device Manager) properties for the optical drive and make sure the digital audio connector box is checkmarked. This is mostly true according to this Annandtech article. http://www.anandtech.com/guides/viewfaq.aspx?i=129 But does this setting in Windows effect third party software that allows you to select either analog or DAE for converting CD tracks to file (ripping)? I thought that as far as ripping CD goes, it could be DAE or analog, depending on your ripping software. As far as playback, the article lists the three methods of getting the CD audio to your speakers, and some disadvantages of DAE. Two of them being high System and PCI traffic, and a noisy drive. The high spinning noisy drive always bothered me. But I usually convert my CDs to MP3s, so I have music with a few clicks of a mouse from the HD. I rarely play the actual music CD more than once in my PC. But to each his own. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
SB Live! and Mixer "Audio CD" slider problem
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:01:15 -0400, E
wrote: But does this setting in Windows effect third party software that allows you to select either analog or DAE for converting CD tracks to file (ripping)? I thought that as far as ripping CD goes, it could be DAE or analog, depending on your ripping software. CD ripping is always done over the data cable by default. If you were to use the analog cable you would be using a sound recording application to record at the actual rate the audio file plays back, and it would be a 2nd generation copy that is lower quality. As far as playback, the article lists the three methods of getting the CD audio to your speakers, and some disadvantages of DAE. Two of them being high System and PCI traffic, and a noisy drive. There is no good reason not to use digital data transfer to rip. Yes the drive is louder because it's ripping at multiple times the speed, you can rip an entire CD in a couple minutes instead of over half an hour. PCI traffic is not an issue, if you don't devote the traffic to what you're trying to do, what point was there to having a PCI bus? There only time anyone would want to rip by playign analog over the cable and recording that were if there were some kind of DRM preventing normal playback but if that were the case, normally the CD/DVD drive couldn't read a standard audio track anyway, the DRM software would have to read the file instead over the data cable. The high spinning noisy drive always bothered me. But I usually convert my CDs to MP3s, so I have music with a few clicks of a mouse from the HD. I rarely play the actual music CD more than once in my PC. But to each his own. It's not like the drive is spinning very long, would you rather have it quieter because it's spinning only 1/3rd as fast but have it take 3X as long to rip? Regardless, try "Nero Drivespeed", if your drive is compatible it will allow setting the max speed the drive runs at so you can force it to run at lower RPM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
SB Live! and Mixer "Audio CD" slider problem
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:13:35 -0400, kony wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:01:15 -0400, E wrote: But does this setting in Windows effect third party software that allows you to select either analog or DAE for converting CD tracks to file (ripping)? I thought that as far as ripping CD goes, it could be DAE or analog, depending on your ripping software. CD ripping is always done over the data cable by default. If you were to use the analog cable you would be using a sound recording application to record at the actual rate the audio file plays back, and it would be a 2nd generation copy that is lower quality. Yes I agree. If you want to save music CD tracks to file (what I call ripping), you want the best quality you can possibly get, first generation, taking the data as seen by the CD drive (DAE). With no analog step in between. We fully expect, and want, to use the PCI bus for this if we want high quality copies. Unless you need to use the analog step, as a work around for like you say, DRM, or errors on the music CD. As far as playback, the article lists the three methods of getting the CD audio to your speakers, and some disadvantages of DAE. Two of them being high System and PCI traffic, and a noisy drive. There is no good reason not to use digital data transfer to rip. Yes the drive is louder because it's ripping at multiple times the speed, you can rip an entire CD in a couple minutes instead of over half an hour. PCI traffic is not an issue, if you don't devote the traffic to what you're trying to do, what point was there to having a PCI bus? Note that I make a distinction between ripping, and playback. When I say ripping, I mean converting to file and saving to disk for later use. And playback is simply getting the CD audio to the speakers, with no music data being permanently saved. Yes, DAE for ripping. Playback depends on other factors. I would say the PCI bus is for everything you are doing on your PC, at any one moment, that requires it. What requires more total system resources if doing the following with software and no hardware acceleration to get music out of the speakers? A. Read a music CD encoded at 1,411kbps from the CD/DVD drive through the IDE cable. B. Read an MP3 encoded at 256kbps from the hard drive (which of course can only be through the SATA or ATA IDE cable). There only time anyone would want to rip by playign analog over the cable and recording that were if there were some kind of DRM preventing normal playback but if that were the case, normally the CD/DVD drive couldn't read a standard audio track anyway, the DRM software would have to read the file instead over the data cable. The high spinning noisy drive always bothered me. But I usually convert my CDs to MP3s, so I have music with a few clicks of a mouse from the HD. I rarely play the actual music CD more than once in my PC. But to each his own. It's not like the drive is spinning very long, would you rather have it quieter because it's spinning only 1/3rd as fast but have it take 3X as long to rip? As I said above, I make a distinction between ripping (saving to files for later use) a music CD, and playing back a music CD. I agree with DAE for ripping CDs. But playback depends on the user and his system. Anyway, it seems my recently installed openSuse installation is using DAE for playback and without the high rpm CD spin-up. The newer DVD-RW does well with DAE for music CD playback. The older CD-RW drive seems to be a little buggie with it, but it works. I also don't know where in Suse to force analog playback of CDs. The older drive could probably use an analog connection since it seems a little unstable with DAE for playback. The instability would be acceptable for ripping to file, as long as the files turn out ok. But I'll probably just use the DVD/CD drive if I ever want to play a CD, since it seems quiet and smooth with DAE. Regardless, try "Nero Drivespeed", if your drive is compatible it will allow setting the max speed the drive runs at so you can force it to run at lower RPM. Apparently some part openSuse or the application I'm using to playback a music CD, seems to implement a Nero Drivespeed type feature, since as I said above there is no CD spin-up. I'll look into Drivespeed for winders if me or someone else I know might want it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
SB Live! and Mixer "Audio CD" slider problem
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:13:35 -0400, kony wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:01:15 -0400, E wrote: But does this setting in Windows effect third party software that allows you to select either analog or DAE for converting CD tracks to file (ripping)? I thought that as far as ripping CD goes, it could be DAE or analog, depending on your ripping software. CD ripping is always done over the data cable by default. If you were to use the analog cable you would be using a sound recording application to record at the actual rate the audio file plays back, and it would be a 2nd generation copy that is lower quality. Yes I agree. If you want to save music CD tracks to file (what I call ripping), you want the best quality you can possibly get, first generation, taking the data as seen by the CD drive (DAE). With no analog step in between. We fully expect, and want, to use the PCI bus for this if we want high quality copies. Unless you need to use the analog step, as a work around for like you say, DRM, or errors on the music CD. As far as playback, the article lists the three methods of getting the CD audio to your speakers, and some disadvantages of DAE. Two of them being high System and PCI traffic, and a noisy drive. There is no good reason not to use digital data transfer to rip. Yes the drive is louder because it's ripping at multiple times the speed, you can rip an entire CD in a couple minutes instead of over half an hour. PCI traffic is not an issue, if you don't devote the traffic to what you're trying to do, what point was there to having a PCI bus? Note that I make a distinction between ripping, and playback. When I say ripping, I mean converting to file and saving to disk for later use. And playback is simply getting the CD audio to the speakers, with no music data being permanently saved. Yes, DAE for ripping. Playback depends on other factors. I would say the PCI bus is for everything you are doing on your PC, at any one moment, that requires it. What requires more total system resources if doing the following with software and no hardware acceleration to get music out of the speakers? A. Read a music CD encoded at 1,411kbps from the CD/DVD drive through the IDE cable. B. Read an MP3 encoded at 256kbps from the hard drive (which of course can only be through the SATA or ATA IDE cable). There only time anyone would want to rip by playign analog over the cable and recording that were if there were some kind of DRM preventing normal playback but if that were the case, normally the CD/DVD drive couldn't read a standard audio track anyway, the DRM software would have to read the file instead over the data cable. The high spinning noisy drive always bothered me. But I usually convert my CDs to MP3s, so I have music with a few clicks of a mouse from the HD. I rarely play the actual music CD more than once in my PC. But to each his own. It's not like the drive is spinning very long, would you rather have it quieter because it's spinning only 1/3rd as fast but have it take 3X as long to rip? As I said above, I make a distinction between ripping (saving to files for later use) a music CD, and playing back a music CD. I agree with DAE for ripping CDs. But playback depends on the user and his system. Anyway, it seems my recently installed openSuse installation is using DAE for playback and without the high rpm CD spin-up. The newer DVD-RW does well with DAE for music CD playback. The older CD-RW drive seems to be a little buggie with it, but it works. I also don't know where in Suse to force analog playback of CDs. The older drive could probably use an analog connection since it seems a little unstable with DAE for playback. The instability would be acceptable for ripping to file, as long as the files turn out ok. But I'll probably just use the DVD/CD drive if I ever want to play a CD, since it seems quiet and smooth with DAE. Regardless, try "Nero Drivespeed", if your drive is compatible it will allow setting the max speed the drive runs at so you can force it to run at lower RPM. Apparently some part openSuse or the application I'm using to playback a music CD, seems to implement a Nero Drivespeed type feature, since as I said above there is no CD spin-up. I'll look into Drivespeed for winders if me or someone else I know might want it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
SB Live! and Mixer "Audio CD" slider problem
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:49:50 -0000, E
wrote: What requires more total system resources if doing the following with software and no hardware acceleration to get music out of the speakers? A. Read a music CD encoded at 1,411kbps from the CD/DVD drive through the IDE cable. B. Read an MP3 encoded at 256kbps from the hard drive (which of course can only be through the SATA or ATA IDE cable). There's no real reason to care, either is far lower than a significant amount of resources, and further each uses different resources, there is not a grand total summary figure that would adequately compare them. With A), your bottleneck would be the CD drive except the bitrate is lower than any drive can handle if working properly and the disc is undamaged. With B), your hard drive has higher throughput potential and a lower bitrate, but slightly higher CPU utilization - a Pentium 233 can play back MP3 fine so it's of little concern for later systems unless one were heavily multitasking and if that's the case, any and both of the above will be a minor penalty - but an acceptible one since you want to listen to music. As I said above, I make a distinction between ripping (saving to files for later use) a music CD, and playing back a music CD. I agree with DAE for ripping CDs. But playback depends on the user and his system. There's no good reason to play a CD over the analog cable either, not today with systems easily having multiple times the processing, decoding performance needed. Even a Celeron 800 would play more than 3 MP3 simultaneously. Yes you can do it - play over the analog cable, and it might even sound as good given an undiscriminating listener or merely average amp and speakers - I don't mean to discourage it, rather there's not anything positive, any reason to do so if digitally over IDE cable works which it normally does. Anyway, it seems my recently installed openSuse installation is using DAE for playback and without the high rpm CD spin-up. The newer DVD-RW does well with DAE for music CD playback. The older CD-RW drive seems to be a little buggie with it, but it works. I also don't know where in Suse to force analog playback of CDs. The older drive could probably use an analog connection since it seems a little unstable with DAE for playback. The instability would be acceptable for ripping to file, as long as the files turn out ok. But I'll probably just use the DVD/CD drive if I ever want to play a CD, since it seems quiet and smooth with DAE. There were a lot of older CD drives that had more trouble ripping, somewhere I still have many MP3 that have clicks and pops in them from ripping with a circa '97 Mitsumi(?) 24X drive, but this kind of problem was soon fixed and anything circa '00 and later shouldn't have this issue. Regardless, try "Nero Drivespeed", if your drive is compatible it will allow setting the max speed the drive runs at so you can force it to run at lower RPM. Apparently some part openSuse or the application I'm using to playback a music CD, seems to implement a Nero Drivespeed type feature, since as I said above there is no CD spin-up. I'll look into Drivespeed for winders if me or someone else I know might want it. Personally I just rip any CD I'd listen to, to the hard drive using whatever compression is preferred then it's stored on a fileserver for more convenient playback - I choose not to swap optical discs back and forth, would never buy anything that requires having the disc in the drive more than one time to rip it, including games... I won't buy one that doesn't have a no-CD crack for it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Downside of changing "Max frames to render ahead"/"Prerender Limit" to 1/0? | Jeremy Reaban | Nvidia Videocards | 2 | March 31st 06 04:24 AM |
User Review: "I WILL NEVER BY ANOTHER HP PRODUCT AS LONG AS I LIVE!!!!" | Bob | General | 11 | March 6th 06 11:01 PM |
Still no audio after system crash during HL2 "Lost Coast" hi-def demo level | !bungle | Nvidia Videocards | 3 | December 1st 05 02:15 AM |