If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
understanding memory specs help
Hi.
I don't really understand memory specs. I am considering the two sets below. is one faster than the other? I don't know what the pc6400 type numbers I see mean. Are both the following 667MHz? would I notice any difference in performance between the two. Its just used for word, surfing, very simple excel and creating simple powerpoint presentations. Corsair Value Select 2048Mb (2x 1024Mb) DDR2 667 Memory Size 2048Mb (2x 1024Mb) Bus Speed PC-5300 CAS Latency 3.0 (ns) Corsair TwinX 2048Mb DDR2-6400 (2x1024Mb) w/ Heat Spreaders Size 2048MB Bus Speed XMS2-6400 DDR2-6400 CAS Latency 5-5-5-12 Number of Pins 2 x 240 Pin -- Nospam |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
understanding memory specs help
Nospam wrote: Hi. I don't really understand memory specs. I am considering the two sets below. is one faster than the other? I don't know what the pc6400 type numbers I see mean. Are both the following 667MHz? would I notice any difference in performance between the two. Its just used for word, surfing, very simple excel and creating simple powerpoint presentations. Corsair Value Select 2048Mb (2x 1024Mb) DDR2 667 Memory Size 2048Mb (2x 1024Mb) Bus Speed PC-5300 CAS Latency 3.0 (ns) Corsair TwinX 2048Mb DDR2-6400 (2x1024Mb) w/ Heat Spreaders Size 2048MB Bus Speed XMS2-6400 DDR2-6400 CAS Latency 5-5-5-12 Number of Pins 2 x 240 Pin -- Nospam One number is the millions of transfers per second, while the other is the bandwidth in megabytes per second. The numbers are optimistic, and assume that the memory can deliver data on each and every cycle, but memory busses are seldom 100% efficient. DIMMs are 8 bytes wide. The transfer rate in one of your examples is DDR2-667 and that gets multiplied by 8 bytes for each transfer, to get the megabytes per second. That gives the PC-5300 number (5300MB/sec). One memory runs at a maximum of 667 Million transfers per second, and the other at 800 Million. The other difference is CAS latency. Column address strobe latency is the time from the column address strobe, until the first data cycle to/from the DIMM. Latency is measured in cycles. Low latency means the processor is stalled for less time, waiting for the data it needs to arrive. The two memories don't have the same cycle time, and cycle time is the inverse of the clock rate. 3 cycles at (1/667) is less delay than 5 cycles at (1/800), relatively speaking. Does any of this matter ? The best way to figure it out, is via benchmarks or reviews. http://www.anandtech.com/memory/showdoc.aspx?i=2732&p=4 Notice in the above table, that one game actually runs slower, once you get away from DDR2-533. SuperPI improves a bit. Far Cry improves a bit. Notice how Far Cry with 667 memory is the same speed as 533 memory. That could even be because of some BIOS trickery (Intel datasheet restriction on operating mode of chipset being honored by the BIOS designer). Many DDR2 memories are capable of being overclocked, and trade relaxed memory timings for clock rate. Thus your DDR2-667 CAS3 memory might be capable of running at DDR2-800 CAS5. Reading more review articles on Anandtech might show you more about how DDR2 behaves. I guess you'll have to decide whether the small difference you see in the Anandtech test results, is something you gotta have. Instead of sinking an extra $100 or $200 or whatever the price differential is today, you might invest that money in a faster processor instead. A higher clock on the processor might be worth more to you, than the lesser improvement given by slightly faster memory. Check your motherboard manual to make sure you can get the value from the DDR2-800 memory. It would be pretty disappointing to buy the DDR2-800 memory, only to find a note in the manual that says the chipset runs at 533 or 667 only. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
understanding memory specs help
Thanks for that.
if I have understood this correctly! the VALUE memory is =================== 667MHz with a bandwidth of 5300MB/sec (8x667 MHz = 5336 = 5300 rounded-down) so should be described on the supplier's website as DDR2-667 PC530 the TWINX memory is =================== 800MHz with a bandwidth of 6400MB/sec (8x800 MHz = 6400) so should be described on the supplier's website as DDR2-800 PC640 The motherboard I have in mind is the Asus M2N-VM DH http://www.asus.com.tw/products4.asp...3&l1=3&l2=101& l3=345 The memory spec says: Dual channel memory architecture 4 x 240-pin DIMM sockets support max. 8GB DDR2 800/ 667/ 533 non-ECC, un-buffered memory So I think both memory sets should work. If I have understood things correctly. I just have to decide is 38UKP worth spending on the faster memory. would I notice any difference using word, powerpoint, excel and surfing on win XP home. I guess not. I might be better buying 4x1020 of the slower memory than 2x1024 of the faster memory. I will, once in a while, use the PC to edit my home movies, but most of the time I do the editing on the DVD player. I just transfer the video to the DVD's hard disc and edit it there. there is the odd occasion that I will want to play with video editing but not often, don't have the time really. thanks for the advice. Nospam wrote: Hi. I don't really understand memory specs. I am considering the two sets below. is one faster than the other? I don't know what the pc6400 type numbers I see mean. Are both the following 667MHz? would I notice any difference in performance between the two. Its just used for word, surfing, very simple excel and creating simple powerpoint presentations. Corsair Value Select 2048Mb (2x 1024Mb) DDR2 667 Memory Size 2048Mb (2x 1024Mb) Bus Speed PC-5300 CAS Latency 3.0 (ns) Corsair TwinX 2048Mb DDR2-6400 (2x1024Mb) w/ Heat Spreaders Size 2048MB Bus Speed XMS2-6400 DDR2-6400 CAS Latency 5-5-5-12 Number of Pins 2 x 240 Pin -- Nospam One number is the millions of transfers per second, while the other is the bandwidth in megabytes per second. The numbers are optimistic, and assume that the memory can deliver data on each and every cycle, but memory busses are seldom 100% efficient. DIMMs are 8 bytes wide. The transfer rate in one of your examples is DDR2-667 and that gets multiplied by 8 bytes for each transfer, to get the megabytes per second. That gives the PC-5300 number (5300MB/sec). One memory runs at a maximum of 667 Million transfers per second, and the other at 800 Million. The other difference is CAS latency. Column address strobe latency is the time from the column address strobe, until the first data cycle to/from the DIMM. Latency is measured in cycles. Low latency means the processor is stalled for less time, waiting for the data it needs to arrive. The two memories don't have the same cycle time, and cycle time is the inverse of the clock rate. 3 cycles at (1/667) is less delay than 5 cycles at (1/800), relatively speaking. Does any of this matter ? The best way to figure it out, is via benchmarks or reviews. http://www.anandtech.com/memory/showdoc.aspx?i=2732&p=4 Notice in the above table, that one game actually runs slower, once you get away from DDR2-533. SuperPI improves a bit. Far Cry improves a bit. Notice how Far Cry with 667 memory is the same speed as 533 memory. That could even be because of some BIOS trickery (Intel datasheet restriction on operating mode of chipset being honored by the BIOS designer). Many DDR2 memories are capable of being overclocked, and trade relaxed memory timings for clock rate. Thus your DDR2-667 CAS3 memory might be capable of running at DDR2-800 CAS5. Reading more review articles on Anandtech might show you more about how DDR2 behaves. I guess you'll have to decide whether the small difference you see in the Anandtech test results, is something you gotta have. Instead of sinking an extra $100 or $200 or whatever the price differential is today, you might invest that money in a faster processor instead. A higher clock on the processor might be worth more to you, than the lesser improvement given by slightly faster memory. Check your motherboard manual to make sure you can get the value from the DDR2-800 memory. It would be pretty disappointing to buy the DDR2-800 memory, only to find a note in the manual that says the chipset runs at 533 or 667 only. Paul Nospam wrote: Hi. I don't really understand memory specs. I am considering the two sets below. is one faster than the other? I don't know what the pc6400 type numbers I see mean. Are both the following 667MHz? would I notice any difference in performance between the two. Its just used for word, surfing, very simple excel and creating simple powerpoint presentations. Corsair Value Select 2048Mb (2x 1024Mb) DDR2 667 Memory Size 2048Mb (2x 1024Mb) Bus Speed PC-5300 CAS Latency 3.0 (ns) Corsair TwinX 2048Mb DDR2-6400 (2x1024Mb) w/ Heat Spreaders Size 2048MB Bus Speed XMS2-6400 DDR2-6400 CAS Latency 5-5-5-12 Number of Pins 2 x 240 Pin -- Nospam One number is the millions of transfers per second, while the other is the bandwidth in megabytes per second. The numbers are optimistic, and assume that the memory can deliver data on each and every cycle, but memory busses are seldom 100% efficient. DIMMs are 8 bytes wide. The transfer rate in one of your examples is DDR2-667 and that gets multiplied by 8 bytes for each transfer, to get the megabytes per second. That gives the PC-5300 number (5300MB/sec). One memory runs at a maximum of 667 Million transfers per second, and the other at 800 Million. The other difference is CAS latency. Column address strobe latency is the time from the column address strobe, until the first data cycle to/from the DIMM. Latency is measured in cycles. Low latency means the processor is stalled for less time, waiting for the data it needs to arrive. The two memories don't have the same cycle time, and cycle time is the inverse of the clock rate. 3 cycles at (1/667) is less delay than 5 cycles at (1/800), relatively speaking. Does any of this matter ? The best way to figure it out, is via benchmarks or reviews. http://www.anandtech.com/memory/showdoc.aspx?i=2732&p=4 Notice in the above table, that one game actually runs slower, once you get away from DDR2-533. SuperPI improves a bit. Far Cry improves a bit. Notice how Far Cry with 667 memory is the same speed as 533 memory. That could even be because of some BIOS trickery (Intel datasheet restriction on operating mode of chipset being honored by the BIOS designer). Many DDR2 memories are capable of being overclocked, and trade relaxed memory timings for clock rate. Thus your DDR2-667 CAS3 memory might be capable of running at DDR2-800 CAS5. Reading more review articles on Anandtech might show you more about how DDR2 behaves. I guess you'll have to decide whether the small difference you see in the Anandtech test results, is something you gotta have. Instead of sinking an extra $100 or $200 or whatever the price differential is today, you might invest that money in a faster processor instead. A higher clock on the processor might be worth more to you, than the lesser improvement given by slightly faster memory. Check your motherboard manual to make sure you can get the value from the DDR2-800 memory. It would be pretty disappointing to buy the DDR2-800 memory, only to find a note in the manual that says the chipset runs at 533 or 667 only. Paul -- Nospam |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
brand name ? | Jack Tseng | Asus Motherboards | 6 | August 28th 06 05:42 AM |
6800 freezes up, but 6600GT doesnt. (Long post, and maybe TMI) | One of Many | Nvidia Videocards | 16 | April 3rd 05 02:19 PM |
Newby - [lease be gentle! | John | Homebuilt PC's | 11 | March 13th 05 10:14 AM |
16mb buffer hard drive in a laptop | Dan Irwin | Storage (alternative) | 49 | November 4th 04 04:18 PM |
What RAm for A7V8X-X? | Devast8or | Asus Motherboards | 9 | August 2nd 03 02:05 PM |