A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Video Cards » Ati Videocards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Doom3 & Cat Beta 4.9



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 5th 04, 07:56 AM
Wags
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Doom3 & Cat Beta 4.9

I tried Doom3 tonight with Cat 4.7 and then Beta 4.9. Here's what I got
in Timedemo1:

Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run)
Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run)

Athlon XP 2800+
1GB DDR 266
Radeon 9700 Pro
  #2  
Old August 5th 04, 08:29 AM
NoRemorse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wags" wrote in message
news:CSkQc.30770$T_6.28677@edtnps89...
I tried Doom3 tonight with Cat 4.7 and then Beta 4.9. Here's what I got
in Timedemo1:

Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run)
Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run)

Athlon XP 2800+
1GB DDR 266
Radeon 9700 Pro


Which quality setting?

--
NoRemorse
"Expect me when you see me."


  #3  
Old August 5th 04, 09:03 AM
melodium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"NoRemorse" wrote in message
...

"Wags" wrote in message
news:CSkQc.30770$T_6.28677@edtnps89...
I tried Doom3 tonight with Cat 4.7 and then Beta 4.9. Here's what I got
in Timedemo1:

Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run)
Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run)

Athlon XP 2800+
1GB DDR 266
Radeon 9700 Pro


Which quality setting?



Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ ----HERE = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run)
Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run)



  #4  
Old August 5th 04, 01:07 PM
rms
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run)
Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run)


So....you are saying you got a 66% increase in framerate with a simple
driver change, when ATI is claiming only a modest increase on the X800
series and none at all for the older cards?

rms


  #5  
Old August 5th 04, 03:35 PM
Mustafa Krap
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Conor" wrote in message
...
In article , rms says...
Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run)
Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run)


So....you are saying you got a 66% increase in framerate with a

simple
driver change,


Why not? It happened with the Detonator drivers for nVIDIA.

--
Conor

life, n.: A whim of several billion cells to be you for a while


Absolutely no difference going from Cat 4.8 to 4.9 for me:

AMD64 3000
512 ddr pc3200 ram
ATI 9800 pro stock speeds

Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5
Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8

Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5
Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8

Rob.




  #6  
Old August 5th 04, 04:18 PM
Tony DiMarzio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You error'd some where during your benchmark process. Redo the tests. You
should not be seeing these performance differences. Make SURE V-Sync is off
and that you've done clean driver installs before you timedemo. Also...
slide the opengl selecter in the ATI control panel to high quality - apply
it - then slide it back to balanced and apply it. This will ensure proper
registry setup per Cat version.

--
Tony DiMarzio




"Wags" wrote in message
news:CSkQc.30770$T_6.28677@edtnps89...
I tried Doom3 tonight with Cat 4.7 and then Beta 4.9. Here's what I got
in Timedemo1:

Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run)
Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run)

Athlon XP 2800+
1GB DDR 266
Radeon 9700 Pro



  #7  
Old August 5th 04, 04:21 PM
Bill Larcombe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mustafa Krap" wrote in message
news:AArQc.16245$gE.8225@pd7tw3no...

"Conor" wrote in message
...
In article , rms says...
Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run)
Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run)

So....you are saying you got a 66% increase in framerate with a

simple
driver change,


Why not? It happened with the Detonator drivers for nVIDIA.

--
Conor

life, n.: A whim of several billion cells to be you for a while


Absolutely no difference going from Cat 4.8 to 4.9 for me:

AMD64 3000
512 ddr pc3200 ram
ATI 9800 pro stock speeds

Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5
Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8

Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5
Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8

Rob.





Useful for me anyhow as I have got, almost, the same setup (9700 np instead
of Pro) as the first poster and I'm going to run D3 @ 800 x 600 (when the
game eventually shows up in the UK). Will try 4.9 but will prolly wait until
they're official.

Thanks

BIllL


  #8  
Old August 5th 04, 04:40 PM
Jeff B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Absolutely no difference going from Cat 4.8 to 4.9 for me:

AMD64 3000
512 ddr pc3200 ram
ATI 9800 pro stock speeds

Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5
Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8

Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5
Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8

Rob.





yeah, I got maybe .3 fps improvement going to the
4.9 on my P4, 3.41 G , x800pro. I think the
4.9 are ATI's pathetic attempt to limit the damage of the
6800 series vast superiority in Doom3.

Jeff B



  #9  
Old August 5th 04, 05:16 PM
NoRemorse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"melodium" wrote in message
...

"NoRemorse" wrote in message
...

"Wags" wrote in message
news:CSkQc.30770$T_6.28677@edtnps89...
I tried Doom3 tonight with Cat 4.7 and then Beta 4.9. Here's what I

got
in Timedemo1:

Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run)
Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run)

Athlon XP 2800+
1GB DDR 266
Radeon 9700 Pro


Which quality setting?



Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ ----HERE = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run)
Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run)



Ooops. Missed that. Thanks.

--
NoRemorse
"Expect me when you see me."


  #10  
Old August 7th 04, 03:44 AM
John Wojcicki
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

how do you find out your fps in Doom3?
John


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Easy CD Creator and Sonic RecordNow! - which to use Xylophone Cdr 15 June 14th 04 10:43 AM
Lets get a class action lawsuit against ROXIO!! smh Cdr 63 February 17th 04 11:21 PM
System tests utility in ECDC...what's the usefulness of it if the results are never the same? KILOWATT Cdr 15 October 4th 03 09:15 PM
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR smh Cdr 14 September 17th 03 09:11 PM
Need opinions of Roxio vs Nero. Bearclaw Cdr 17 August 8th 03 02:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.