If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Doom3 & Cat Beta 4.9
I tried Doom3 tonight with Cat 4.7 and then Beta 4.9. Here's what I got
in Timedemo1: Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run) Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run) Athlon XP 2800+ 1GB DDR 266 Radeon 9700 Pro |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Wags" wrote in message news:CSkQc.30770$T_6.28677@edtnps89... I tried Doom3 tonight with Cat 4.7 and then Beta 4.9. Here's what I got in Timedemo1: Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run) Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run) Athlon XP 2800+ 1GB DDR 266 Radeon 9700 Pro Which quality setting? -- NoRemorse "Expect me when you see me." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"NoRemorse" wrote in message ... "Wags" wrote in message news:CSkQc.30770$T_6.28677@edtnps89... I tried Doom3 tonight with Cat 4.7 and then Beta 4.9. Here's what I got in Timedemo1: Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run) Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run) Athlon XP 2800+ 1GB DDR 266 Radeon 9700 Pro Which quality setting? Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ ----HERE = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run) Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run)
Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run) So....you are saying you got a 66% increase in framerate with a simple driver change, when ATI is claiming only a modest increase on the X800 series and none at all for the older cards? rms |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Conor" wrote in message ... In article , rms says... Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run) Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run) So....you are saying you got a 66% increase in framerate with a simple driver change, Why not? It happened with the Detonator drivers for nVIDIA. -- Conor life, n.: A whim of several billion cells to be you for a while Absolutely no difference going from Cat 4.8 to 4.9 for me: AMD64 3000 512 ddr pc3200 ram ATI 9800 pro stock speeds Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5 Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8 Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5 Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8 Rob. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
You error'd some where during your benchmark process. Redo the tests. You
should not be seeing these performance differences. Make SURE V-Sync is off and that you've done clean driver installs before you timedemo. Also... slide the opengl selecter in the ATI control panel to high quality - apply it - then slide it back to balanced and apply it. This will ensure proper registry setup per Cat version. -- Tony DiMarzio "Wags" wrote in message news:CSkQc.30770$T_6.28677@edtnps89... I tried Doom3 tonight with Cat 4.7 and then Beta 4.9. Here's what I got in Timedemo1: Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run) Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run) Athlon XP 2800+ 1GB DDR 266 Radeon 9700 Pro |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Mustafa Krap" wrote in message news:AArQc.16245$gE.8225@pd7tw3no... "Conor" wrote in message ... In article , rms says... Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run) Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run) So....you are saying you got a 66% increase in framerate with a simple driver change, Why not? It happened with the Detonator drivers for nVIDIA. -- Conor life, n.: A whim of several billion cells to be you for a while Absolutely no difference going from Cat 4.8 to 4.9 for me: AMD64 3000 512 ddr pc3200 ram ATI 9800 pro stock speeds Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5 Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8 Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5 Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8 Rob. Useful for me anyhow as I have got, almost, the same setup (9700 np instead of Pro) as the first poster and I'm going to run D3 @ 800 x 600 (when the game eventually shows up in the UK). Will try 4.9 but will prolly wait until they're official. Thanks BIllL |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Absolutely no difference going from Cat 4.8 to 4.9 for me: AMD64 3000 512 ddr pc3200 ram ATI 9800 pro stock speeds Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5 Cat 4.8 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8 Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ 2xAA, 8XAnis 2nd run 30.5 Cat 4.9 1024x768 MQ no AA or Anis 2nd run 47.8 Rob. yeah, I got maybe .3 fps improvement going to the 4.9 on my P4, 3.41 G , x800pro. I think the 4.9 are ATI's pathetic attempt to limit the damage of the 6800 series vast superiority in Doom3. Jeff B |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"melodium" wrote in message ... "NoRemorse" wrote in message ... "Wags" wrote in message news:CSkQc.30770$T_6.28677@edtnps89... I tried Doom3 tonight with Cat 4.7 and then Beta 4.9. Here's what I got in Timedemo1: Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run) Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run) Athlon XP 2800+ 1GB DDR 266 Radeon 9700 Pro Which quality setting? Cat 4.7 1024x768 HQ ----HERE = 20 (1st run) 21.6 (2nd run) Cat 4.9 1024x768 HQ = 31 (1st run) 36 (2nd run) Ooops. Missed that. Thanks. -- NoRemorse "Expect me when you see me." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
how do you find out your fps in Doom3?
John |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Easy CD Creator and Sonic RecordNow! - which to use | Xylophone | Cdr | 15 | June 14th 04 10:43 AM |
Lets get a class action lawsuit against ROXIO!! | smh | Cdr | 63 | February 17th 04 11:21 PM |
System tests utility in ECDC...what's the usefulness of it if the results are never the same? | KILOWATT | Cdr | 15 | October 4th 03 09:15 PM |
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR | smh | Cdr | 14 | September 17th 03 09:11 PM |
Need opinions of Roxio vs Nero. | Bearclaw | Cdr | 17 | August 8th 03 02:11 AM |