If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Using both parallel & USB on same printer (Canon ip4000) Success!
Success! I defined my Canon ip4000 twice -- once as a USB printer; and
once as an LPR printer that uses ethernet to a print server appliance to the printer's parallel port. It appears to work fine, with no conflicts. The USB interface is considerably faster, AND it enables me to use the Canon printer monitor software to monitor the ink supply. The LPR interface enables me to use the printer from any computer in the house, albeit without the ink monitoring. For the USB, I am using a 16-foot Belkin USB2 cable (gold contacts; 20-gauge conductors) that I got from amazon.com for $7.95. Because I was going for a long cable, I thought I should buy a high quality cable in order to maximize my chances of success. It works fine with no problems. [No, this is not an ad. I just thought that it might be a success factor]. If your print server appliance uses the printer's USB port, instead, you might want to try the reverse: i.e., connecting the printer's parallel port to a computer's parallel port. Make sure to use a bi-directional parallel cable with all the pins wired. - David "David D." wrote in message ... "Franzy" wrote in message ... Does not work for me either since I have a USB print server, so the printer's USB port is already used. I had the server before I bought the printer. I am thinking about selling the server and just connect the printer to a computer again and share it. I have tested it and then you are able to see the ink level and all the cool error messages like you forgot to open the output tray, again. Thanks! Frans :-) You could try the opposite. Use the USB for your print server connection, and the parallel port to the nearest computer to check on the ink. I don't guarantee that it would work, but if you have a bi-directional parallel cable lying around, you could try it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
David D. wrote:
Success! I defined my Canon ip4000 twice -- once as a USB printer; and once as an LPR printer that uses ethernet to a print server appliance to the printer's parallel port. It appears to work fine, with no conflicts. The USB interface is considerably faster, AND it enables me to use the Canon printer monitor software to monitor the ink supply. The LPR interface enables me to use the printer from any computer in the house, albeit without the ink monitoring. etc. You anticipated my question, is the USB connection noticeably faster than the parallel connection - I'd think either connection will supply data faster than the printer could use it. I went parallel only because the cable was already connected to the computer as a "left over" from my previous printer. I can easily reconnect to a USB port, though. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan Wenz" wrote in message
... You anticipated my question, is the USB connection noticeably faster than the parallel connection - I'd think either connection will supply data faster than the printer could use it. I went parallel only because the cable was already connected to the computer as a "left over" from my previous printer. I can easily reconnect to a USB port, though. Try hooking both up at the same time. The parallel port connection and the USB connections will then appear on your computer as two different printers. (Name them so that you can tell which is which). With stopwatch in hand, compare the print speed of the two paths. Try a variety of print sources -- photos, text, web, etc. Please let us know what you find out. It is fun for techies to debate the pros and cons of different connection types, but only a live test will tell for sure. Unless you are loaded up with high-bandwidth USB devices, my vote would be for a tie. A network connection through a print server is a different matter. You have an extra hop and extra buffering, controls and handshakes. A print server appliance may be practically unbuffered, whereas a general computer-based print server may be able to buffer well and offload the client. Print start-up delays are especially noticeable. - David |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
David D. wrote:
Success! I defined my Canon ip4000 twice -- once as a USB printer; and once as an LPR printer that uses ethernet to a print server appliance to the printer's parallel port. It appears to work fine, with no conflicts. The USB interface is considerably faster, AND it enables me to use the Canon printer monitor software to monitor the ink supply. The LPR interface enables me to use the printer from any computer in the house, albeit without the ink monitoring. For the USB, I am using a 16-foot Belkin USB2 cable (gold contacts; 20-gauge conductors) that I got from amazon.com for $7.95. Because I was going for a long cable, I thought I should buy a high quality cable in order to maximize my chances of success. It works fine with no problems. [No, this is not an ad. I just thought that it might be a success factor]. If your print server appliance uses the printer's USB port, instead, you might want to try the reverse: i.e., connecting the printer's parallel port to a computer's parallel port. Make sure to use a bi-directional parallel cable with all the pins wired. - David "David D." wrote in message ... "Franzy" wrote in message . .. Does not work for me either since I have a USB print server, so the printer's USB port is already used. I had the server before I bought the printer. I am thinking about selling the server and just connect the printer to a computer again and share it. I have tested it and then you are able to see the ink level and all the cool error messages like you forgot to open the output tray, again. Thanks! Frans :-) You could try the opposite. Use the USB for your print server connection, and the parallel port to the nearest computer to check on the ink. I don't guarantee that it would work, but if you have a bi-directional parallel cable lying around, you could try it. This has been done before on other makes. The problem was the first computer to boot would take possession of the printer and not release it. Do you have this problem? The speed difference between USB versus parallel boils down to USB using less CPU loading. It allows you to do other things while printing at the same time while having less effect on the print speed. If printing is the only thing you are doing then the speed difference is less noticeable because it is the printer that is the bottle neck, not the connection type. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"tomcas" wrote in message
et... This has been done before on other makes. The problem was the first computer to boot would take possession of the printer and not release it. Do you have this problem? [...] I have not experienced any conflicts. The first "computer" to boot is my print server appliance on the printer's parallel port. All of the computers in my house can talk to the print server. Additionally, one computer also is hooked up to the USB. That computer can print either through the LPR or through the USB. I have tried to set up conflict situations, even using both ports at once from the same computer, but the printer handles it ok. - David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
David D. wrote:
Please let us know what you find out. It is fun for techies to debate the pros and cons of different connection types, but only a live test will tell for sure. Unless you are loaded up with high-bandwidth USB devices, my vote would be for a tie. etc. Thanks to all for your replies - I'm going to stick with the parallel connection for the time being, there's other "stuff" I want to hookup to remaining usb ports. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem installing USB printers on Dell 4500 | Paul Filion | Dell Computers | 14 | August 22nd 04 11:51 AM |
hp printer slowing to a stop 2 | tenchman | Printers | 4 | August 6th 04 06:50 AM |
Dell printer 960 | gringo | Dell Computers | 5 | April 9th 04 07:26 AM |
Parallel printer port driver | Léonard MOR | Printers | 6 | January 18th 04 09:36 PM |
parallel vs. usb cable printer connection | [email protected] | Printers | 3 | July 10th 03 08:20 PM |