If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Athlon 64 system: PC3200 @2-2-2 or PC3500 @2-3-3?
To flesh out the subject a bit: I'm going to be putting together an
Athlon 64 3500+ system soon. If there's one thing I am not entirely clear on, it's which ram I should get. My current understanding is that an Athlon 64-based system can't really make use of the extra speed PC3500 (or higher) ram offers over PC3200, unless one overclocks things, which I do plan to take a stab at, though I won't be going to any extremes. I could get my hands on either some PC3200 at timings of 2-2-2-5, or PC3500 with slightly worse timings, 2-3-3 being typical. But I frequently see complete Athlon 64 systems being sold with PC4000 (or faster!) ram, and I simply have to wonder if there's a major gap in my education about how that platform works. Far as I can tell, ram that fast doesn't come with timings as low as 2-2-2. Since the Athlon 64 isn't supposed to be able to take advantage of anything exceeding DDR400, it _seems_ to me that the best route is to simply get some PC3200 with the best possible timings. But, again, this could be completely wrong. Hopefully the knowledgable folks here know the answer. Thanks for any help! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:41:16 -0700, Marc Brown wrote:
To flesh out the subject a bit: I'm going to be putting together an Athlon 64 3500+ system soon. If there's one thing I am not entirely clear on, it's which ram I should get. My current understanding is that an Athlon 64-based system can't really make use of the extra speed PC3500 (or higher) ram offers over PC3200, unless one overclocks things, which I do plan to take a stab at, though I won't be going to any extremes. I could get my hands on either some PC3200 at timings of 2-2-2-5, or PC3500 with slightly worse timings, 2-3-3 being typical. But I frequently see complete Athlon 64 systems being sold with PC4000 (or faster!) ram, and I simply have to wonder if there's a major gap in my education about how that platform works. Far as I can tell, ram that fast doesn't come with timings as low as 2-2-2. Since the Athlon 64 isn't supposed to be able to take advantage of anything exceeding DDR400, it _seems_ to me that the best route is to simply get some PC3200 with the best possible timings. But, again, this could be completely wrong. Hopefully the knowledgable folks here know the answer. Thanks for any help! You're right. Get PC3200 RAM, the Athlon 64 can't use speed grades above that. The most important thing is that you go with a quality vendor, I usually use Crucial. Reliability is far more important than tiny performance differences. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Athlon XP system won't turn on | Jeremy Todd | General | 2 | July 18th 04 08:13 PM |
Dual processor system vs Single processor system | HawkEye_42 | General | 3 | January 27th 04 12:01 PM |
A7V333 with Athlon 3000 XP | MarkW | General | 8 | January 3rd 04 10:32 PM |
Multi-boot Windows XP without special software | Timothy Daniels | General | 11 | December 12th 03 06:38 AM |
Cooling Questions | Peter Cavan | General | 35 | September 2nd 03 06:42 AM |