|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
November 28th 03, 03:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Picture quality
Using Nvidia's 44.09-detonators.
Am I blind or howcome I can't see any differences in picture quality between "High Performance" and "Quality"- settings? I even took few screen captures from UT2003 using both settings and spent a moment comparing the pictures. After that I can't understand why those settings even exist? Supposely using "Quality" only slows down fps without any visually noticeable reason. Omega-drivers are perhaps a whole different story (haven't tried yet). 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GIGABYTE TECHNOLOGY receives highest honors—15th Annual National Quality Award | Gigabyte USA Marketing | Gigabyte Motherboards | 0 | November 4th 04 07:35 PM |
| MP3s to CD: does "on-the-fly" burning give same audio quality as doing it in 2 steps?!.. | Anonymous Joe | Cdr | 15 | October 27th 03 06:55 AM |
| quality of picture on TV compared to quality on monitor | Marcel Verduyn | General | 6 | October 12th 03 08:12 PM |
| Anyone have poor TV picture quality with the AIW9700Pro? | Raoul Duke | Ati Videocards | 0 | September 4th 03 05:53 PM |
| TV Picture Quality | Bob M | Ati Videocards | 0 | August 10th 03 05:54 PM |
Threaded Mode