If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Guru3D nvidia boys and other tests comparing NVIDIA FX - ATI RADEON
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Après mure réflexion, "Juan Alvarez" a écrit :
http://www.elite*******s.com/page.ph...d=1&comments=1 http://www.beyond3d.com/misc/traod_dx9perf/ http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1863 Jesus Christ no ****. I must of seen those articles a 100 times. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Juan Alvarez" wrote in message
... http://www.elite*******s.com/page.ph...d=1&comments=1 http://www.beyond3d.com/misc/traod_dx9perf/ http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1863 Dumbass-listen, it's OK, I have a 9800 because it's the best out right now-you don't have to feel like you're inadequate because you own an ATI card-seek help! --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.522 / Virus Database: 320 - Release Date: 9/29/03 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you for the reply. Nice French !
Can you explain your remark? I visit the Guru3D site regularly to be informed about videocard performance, drivers, benchmarks, etc. I want to get an objective, as possible, comparison. With the latest Guru3D videocard test (aquamark 3) I get a poor testing condition, why is the Radeon 9800 Pro missing and why are the results totally different from other tests, that 'seem' to be better done ? I don't care who the manufacturer is, I want good testing, experimental, conditions. Otherwise it's non information to me. I like to play the best 3D games as fast as possible with the highest quality. If the fx ultra card is the best I go for that one. "Lee Marsh" wrote in message e9.co.uk... Après mure réflexion, "Juan Alvarez" a écrit : http://www.elite*******s.com/page.ph...d=1&comments=1 http://www.beyond3d.com/misc/traod_dx9perf/ http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1863 Jesus Christ no ****. I must of seen those articles a 100 times. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Juan Alvarez" a pensé très fort :
Thank you for the reply. Nice French ! Can you explain your remark? I visit the Guru3D site regularly to be informed about videocard performance, drivers, benchmarks, etc. I want to get an objective, as possible, comparison. With the latest Guru3D videocard test (aquamark 3) I get a poor testing condition, why is the Radeon 9800 Pro missing and why are the results totally different from other tests, that 'seem' to be better done ? I don't care who the manufacturer is, I want good testing, experimental, conditions. Otherwise it's non information to me. I like to play the best 3D games as fast as possible with the highest quality. If the fx ultra card is the best I go for that one. Juan so be it, I was simply saying I've seen ATI fanboys mention those articles slagging off Nvidia all over the web lately, its not new anymore and its boring |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Lee Marsh" avait prétendu :
"Juan Alvarez" a pensé très fort : why is the Radeon 9800 Pro missing and why are the results totally different from other tests, that 'seem' to be better done ? I have no idea why the 9800 Pro is missing perhaps they don't have one? as for why the results are different to other reviews, maybe Guru3D are just more advanced at tweaking graphics cards and computers :P |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|