If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Anandtech's Conroe vs. FX60
Anandtech did a test on a couple of Intel-supplied boxes one containing
a pre-release Conroe vs. an FX60. And exactly as Intel said, their box beat the FX60 in every test by about 30%. AnandTech: Spring IDF 2006 Conroe Preview: Intel Regains the Performance Crown http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/...spx?i=2713&p=1 Of course, not everyone is convinced. Rahul Sood has a counterpoint: Rahul Sood's Weblog http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/03...ine.html#links Yousuf Khan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Anandtech's Conroe vs. FX60
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Yousuf Khan wrote in part:
Anandtech did a test on a couple of Intel-supplied boxes one containing a pre-release Conroe vs. an FX60. And exactly as Intel said, their box beat the FX60 in every test by about 30%. AnandTech: Spring IDF 2006 Conroe Preview: Intel Regains the Performance Crown http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/...spx?i=2713&p=1 I'm appalled Anand would accept Intel's build of an AMD FX60. Too much room for sandbagging. Can't he build one himself? Of course, not everyone is convinced. Rahul Sood has a counterpoint: Rahul Sood's Weblog http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/03...ine.html#links Some good points, esp BIOS & CnQ. -- Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Anandtech's Conroe vs. FX60
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:51:51 -0500, Yousuf Khan
wrote: Anandtech did a test on a couple of Intel-supplied boxes one containing a pre-release Conroe vs. an FX60. And exactly as Intel said, their box beat the FX60 in every test by about 30%. AnandTech: Spring IDF 2006 Conroe Preview: Intel Regains the Performance Crown http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/...spx?i=2713&p=1 Of course, not everyone is convinced. Rahul Sood has a counterpoint: Rahul Sood's Weblog http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/03...ine.html#links Well, I do tend to agree with some others that it's a bit early to make any final judgments here, but it DOES look like Intel will finally be competitive again. It's been a few years now since Intel had any hope of competing against AMD on the desktop, workstation or server front, basically not since the Opteron/Athlon64 were released. The latest dual-core chips from each company only served to highlight just how far behind Intel had dropped. With these new chips it looks like Intel should be right back up there in terms of performance AND power consumption. I suspect that these benchmarks are going to be a bit of a best-case-scenario sort of thing, and AMD will probably still end up winning some benchmarks. However I don't see any major improvements on the way from AMD any time soon, really DDR2 is the only thing planned for the rest of this year. Given that, my money is on Intel being top-dog for the second half of the year and into next year at the least. The good news to all this is that it means we'll finally have real competition again, and that should push prices down! It seems to me like prices had kind of stagnated for the last while. AMD had Intel beat so badly that they didn't need to lower prices much, and Intel has sufficient numbers of loyal customers (ie Dell) that they don't need to worry about the fact that they aren't competitive anywhere outside of laptop chips. ------------- Tony Hill hilla underscore 20 at yahoo dot ca |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Anandtech's Conroe vs. FX60
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:51:51 -0500, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Anandtech did a test on a couple of Intel-supplied boxes one containing a pre-release Conroe vs. an FX60. And exactly as Intel said, their box beat the FX60 in every test by about 30%. AnandTech: Spring IDF 2006 Conroe Preview: Intel Regains the Performance Crown http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/...spx?i=2713&p=1 One thing I don't get here is the large difference in game scores - I thought that at those resolutions, 1280x1024, the CPU was overwhelmed by the GPU in frame rate scores - has this changed? Of course, not everyone is convinced. Rahul Sood has a counterpoint: Rahul Sood's Weblog http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/03...ine.html#links Seems like Intel has really taken the bull by the horns here. If they screwed with the benchmark system setup, even unwittingly, they're gonna get gored... and of course, the truth "will out". Also, I have to ask: what the hell are they going to do about the umm, P4 inventory over the next 4 months? They really expect people to buy them after this?... maybe put all the fabs on furlough?:-) -- Rgds, George Macdonald |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Anandtech's Conroe vs. FX60
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:15:58 GMT, Robert Redelmeier
wrote: I'm appalled Anand would accept Intel's build of an AMD FX60. Too much room for sandbagging. Can't he build one himself? I don't think they have a choice. Intel set up the two systems and gave them an hour without advance notice. However since then Anand has updated that article with a revisit. Of course, not everyone is convinced. Rahul Sood has a counterpoint: Rahul Sood's Weblog http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/03...ine.html#links Some good points, esp BIOS & CnQ. http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2716 The updated BIOS crept AMD upwards by 1FPS here and there. The main killer was Anandtech configured the AMD settings for FEAR wrongly, 1280x960 vs Intel at 1024x768. But overall Conroe is still sitting a comfortable overall 20% ahead of an overclocked FX-60. So even with AM2/DDR2 improvements, it wouldn't be unreasonable to think that Conroe is likely to be seeing at least a 10% lead on the competition at launch? -- A Lost Angel, fallen from heaven Lost in dreams, Lost in aspirations, Lost to the world, Lost to myself |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Anandtech's Conroe vs. FX60
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips The little lost angel wrote in part:
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:15:58 GMT, Robert Redelmeier I'm appalled Anand would accept Intel's build of an AMD FX60. Too much room for sandbagging. Can't he build one himself? I don't think they have a choice. Intel set up the two systems and gave them an hour without advance notice. No problem. Anand grabs a disk of low-level diags, and goes visit. Runs diags to check clock, cache, memory timings, etc. Then writes down benchmark results. Goes home, builds AMD as close as he can, and rebenches. This isn't perfect, 'cuz he cannot know if Intel has done opty things with the OS install or drivers. But he can have some assurance they didn't cripple the competition, 'cuz only he could have. Being courted by big powerful vendors is flattering, but if an evaluator is to remain independant they have to do some work. However since then Anand has updated that article with a revisit. http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2716 The updated BIOS crept AMD upwards by 1FPS here and there. Nothing from disabling CnQ? The main killer was Anandtech configured the AMD settings for FEAR wrongly, 1280x960 vs Intel at 1024x768. Well, these sorts of 36% goofs are bound to happen when he hurries. But overall Conroe is still sitting a comfortable overall 20% ahead of an overclocked FX-60. Maybe so. AFAIK, Conroe (a suburb of Houston) is good technology from P6/PentiumM after lots of laptop (power savings) optimization. Intel also knows a lot more about SMP (X2) and avoiding contention/stalls. Overclocking never has been all that great (proportionate) and other systems (busses) have to keep up. So even with AM2/DDR2 improvements, it wouldn't be unreasonable to think that Conroe is likely to be seeing at least a 10% lead on the competition at launch? It's certainly possible. I'd be more worried about this DDR2/666. That sounds like a double pumped 333 MHz (or is it quad 166?). Those mobos won't be easy to make. -- Robert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Anandtech's Conroe vs. FX60
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 04:57:28 -0500, George Macdonald wrote:
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:51:51 -0500, Yousuf Khan wrote: Anandtech did a test on a couple of Intel-supplied boxes one containing a pre-release Conroe vs. an FX60. And exactly as Intel said, their box beat the FX60 in every test by about 30%. AnandTech: Spring IDF 2006 Conroe Preview: Intel Regains the Performance Crown http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/...spx?i=2713&p=1 One thing I don't get here is the large difference in game scores - I thought that at those resolutions, 1280x1024, the CPU was overwhelmed by the GPU in frame rate scores - has this changed? Of course, not everyone is convinced. Rahul Sood has a counterpoint: Rahul Sood's Weblog http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/03...ine.html#links Seems like Intel has really taken the bull by the horns here. If they screwed with the benchmark system setup, even unwittingly, they're gonna get gored... and of course, the truth "will out". Also, I have to ask: what the hell are they going to do about the umm, P4 inventory over the next 4 months? They really expect people to buy them after this?... maybe put all the fabs on furlough?:-) I was thinking the same thing but then I looked at the prices of the PD and all my questions were answered. I bet Dell will have a lot of good sales on desktops for the next few months. I also see this a a job well done for AMD, just look at how long it took Intel to catch up? When the release of AM2 happens, which people knew was only a ddr2 update, AMD is only 10% behind. I would say that is one big accomplishment. The real question is where are all the Intel server parts? We all know that bread and butter is in the server parts, lets see some benchmarks of those parts. Also like the fine article mentioned, Intel was flogging chips but where were the motherboards? Manufactures were showing AM2 boards but no AM2 chips. I think when June comes around you will be able to pick up an AM2 chip and have a good choice of boards to choose from. I also bet SM, Tyan will have boards available, we all know how people love getting their hands on product when its released. I don't know about you but if a company has a choice of boards, and availability is good, then I see it as good for AMD. I also see it as problematic for Intel as who else is making the chipsets? I see this as a supply demand problem, the demand for the new chipsets will be greater, and will encourage people to go another route. If your chip is only 10% slower on some benchmarks, and price is good then I don't see the gloom and doom that some predict of AMD. Would you want to buy a first generation Intel chipset given the last few years, and Intel's current track record? All I can say is it's going to be good for the consumer. Gnu_Raiz *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Anandtech's Conroe vs. FX60
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:37:21 -0500, Keith wrote:
Since this is AISA, I was wondering about the drop in AMD's stock (wife insisted on buying back in shrug). While not betting any part of my body on this, here is my take on it: AMD down to under 30 by the end of summer, and back to at least around 40 about a quarter (maybe a little longer) after 65nm release, assuming they don't screw up on it. If they do... well, they better don't. Unlike Intel, AMD doesn't have such a luxury as being able to afford to screw up... The problem I see with the Intel announcement having an affect on AMD's value is that Intel is sucking wind Of course it is - Conroe is at least a quarter away, so Intel will lose a few more percentage points of market share by the time it is released officially, and then some before it is awailable in quantities from PC makers (AAPL is not one of them). Or alternatively Intel will lose quite a bunch pushing Netbust at firesale prices. Or a combination of these 2. too. Me thinks techs in general are on the outs with investors. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Anandtech's Conroe vs. FX60
Keith wrote:
Since this is AISA, I was wondering about the drop in AMD's stock (wife insisted on buying back in shrug). The problem I see with the Intel announcement having an affect on AMD's value is that Intel is sucking wind too. Me thinks techs in general are on the outs with investors. Well, it's also CSIPHC. :-) I think AMD's recent stock price downturn can be entirely blamed on me, I chipped in for a few more shares a couple of weeks back. I'm sorry. ;-) It is rather amusing that AMD got hammered more than Intel for taking marketshare away from Intel. Signs are everywhere, over 80% AMD marketshare in retail desktops, over 1/3 share in laptops. I dread the day when AMD takes 50% overall marketshare in everything. :-) Yousuf Khan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help me get the AMD Athlon FX60... | [email protected] | Homebuilt PC's | 2 | March 6th 06 10:13 PM |
Help me get an AMD Athlon FX60... | [email protected] | General | 1 | March 6th 06 05:46 PM |
Anandtech's new article on the current crop of SLI motherboards is a MUST-READ... | John Lewis | Nvidia Videocards | 0 | February 28th 05 06:29 PM |
Anandtechs Low end video card review - 9200 vs 9600se/Pro/XT 9800XT vs Nvidia | Darthy | Ati Videocards | 0 | December 16th 03 08:42 AM |