If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
which graphic card serie Workstation or Gaming?
Hello all,
I have been comparing the two ATI series also the equivalent NVidia and can not figure out what are the major differences between the Workstation and Gaming series? One main difference is obvious: price tag I have a DELL Worstation 670 with 64-bit extensions and PCI-Express graphic port and would like to upgrade it with the most powerful and reasonably priced Graphic Card but I am affraid of selecting the cheaper Gaming models serie and then realizing it would not perform as well as the Workstation model ... My needs? - Software Development - Database Development - Gaming :-) Half-Life 2/Counter-Strike/AOM/etc - No CAD applications - Support for different OS(s): XP, Linux, Unix, Solaris 4 Intel. My Workstation shipped bundled with an ATI Fire V3100 I did not want to ask DELL for a different one because they would most likely overprice it, I decided to get the cheapest bundled from DELL and upgrade later on. TIA, Best Regards, Giovanni |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Giovanni Azua says...
Hello all, I have been comparing the two ATI series also the equivalent NVidia and can not figure out what are the major differences between the Workstation and Gaming series? One main difference is obvious: price tag I have a DELL Worstation 670 with 64-bit extensions and PCI-Express graphic port and would like to upgrade it with the most powerful and reasonably priced Graphic Card but I am affraid of selecting the cheaper Gaming models serie and then realizing it would not perform as well as the Workstation model ... My needs? - Software Development - Database Development - Gaming :-) Half-Life 2/Counter-Strike/AOM/etc - No CAD applications - Support for different OS(s): XP, Linux, Unix, Solaris 4 Intel. My Workstation shipped bundled with an ATI Fire V3100 I did not want to ask DELL for a different one because they would most likely overprice it, I decided to get the cheapest bundled from DELL and upgrade later on. Go for the gaming one. You only need the workstation one if you use CAD. If you intend using Linux, go for a nVIDIA one for better driver support. -- Conor An imperfect plan executed violently is far superior to a perfect plan. -- George Patton |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Giovanni Azua" wrote in message ... Hello all, I have been comparing the two ATI series also the equivalent NVidia and can not figure out what are the major differences between the Workstation and Gaming series? One main difference is obvious: price tag I have a DELL Worstation 670 with 64-bit extensions and PCI-Express graphic port and would like to upgrade it with the most powerful and reasonably priced Graphic Card but I am affraid of selecting the cheaper Gaming models serie and then realizing it would not perform as well as the Workstation model ... My needs? - Software Development - Database Development - Gaming :-) Half-Life 2/Counter-Strike/AOM/etc - No CAD applications - Support for different OS(s): XP, Linux, Unix, Solaris 4 Intel. My Workstation shipped bundled with an ATI Fire V3100 I did not want to ask DELL for a different one because they would most likely overprice it, I decided to get the cheapest bundled from DELL and upgrade later on. TIA, Best Regards, Giovanni Same, Don't touch the professional video cards for gaming (Maybe the NVIDIA Quadro would be ok). They are solely meant to be stable using 3D apps and are not made to perform fps wise. Anyway, FireGLs seem to always have bugs when running CAD applications and suck for games (Precision 470 here, also w/ a V3100). -- Luc Monod Engineering Coordinator |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Luc,
"Luc Monod" wrote in message Same, Don't touch the professional video cards for gaming (Maybe the NVIDIA Quadro would be ok). They are solely meant to be stable using 3D apps and are not made to perform fps wise. Anyway, FireGLs seem to always have bugs when running CAD applications and suck for games (Precision 470 here, also w/ a V3100). Thank you for the response, I somehow had already decided to wait for the NVidia GeForce 6800 Ultra PCI-Express with the 256MB GDDR3 to arrive to Switzerland or probably could have it shipped to me from US. My impression is the same about the ATI V3100, the games look pretty bad, in fact it is the major bottleneck I have in my Precision 670. I regret I didn't ask DELL to deliver without Graphic card and get the 300CHF back ... but it's too late already. Best Regards, Giovanni |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Luc Monod wrote:
Don't touch the professional video cards for gaming (Maybe the NVIDIA Quadro would be ok). They are solely meant to be stable using 3D apps and are not made to perform fps wise. That's not true. I've been gaming with Quadro and FireGL cards for years... The Nvidia Quadro and ATI FireGL use the same GPUs like the "gaming cards". In games they perform the same like the cheaper consumer cards (Geforce and Radeon). The only problem is the ATI FireGL driver which uses settings fixed on "quality" which is slow and doesn't provide any tabs for changing any of these settings. With utilities like RageTweaker You can change the settings like You can do on a generic Radeon card. With the Nvidia drivers it's different, with Quadro cards You get much more settings in the control tab... Both FireGL and Quadro perform equally well on Games like the corresponding Geforce and Radeon models... Anyway, FireGLs seem to always have bugs when running CAD applications and suck for games (Precision 470 here, also w/ a V3100). The ATI drivers always had problems with OpenGL. The FireGL drivers are better than the Radeon drivers but still not as good as the drivers from Nvidia... Benjamin |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Giovanni Azua wrote:
I have been comparing the two ATI series also the equivalent NVidia and can not figure out what are the major differences between the Workstation and Gaming series? It's simple. The workstation cards offer certified drivers (which You need if You want support from Your vendor of Your CAD software), several features needed in the professional market (i.e. antialiased lines, multipipe output with PCIe cards, etc), a very good analog signal quality (to avoid blurry pictures on a big crt), and a very hig price... From a technical point of view the FireGL and Quadro cards are almost identical to the Radeon and Geforce models... One main difference is obvious: price tag I have a DELL Worstation 670 a Dell Precision 670... with 64-bit extensions and PCI-Express graphic port and would like to upgrade it with the most powerful and reasonably priced Graphic Card but I am affraid of selecting the cheaper Gaming models serie and then realizing it would not perform as well as the Workstation model ... My needs? - Software Development no advantage with a professional gfx card - Database Development no advantage with a professional gfx card - Gaming :-) Half-Life 2/Counter-Strike/AOM/etc no advantage with a professional gfx card (but no disadvantage, either) - No CAD applications so You don't use anything that would benefit from the additional features of a professional gfx card... - Support for different OS(s): XP, Linux, Unix, Solaris 4 Intel. If You say Linux You want Nvidia. ATIs Linux drivers suck really badly... My Workstation shipped bundled with an ATI Fire V3100 I did not want to ask DELL for a different one because they would most likely overprice it, I decided to get the cheapest bundled from DELL and upgrade later on. Right decision... I bought a similar machine (HP xw8200 Dual XEON 3GHz EM64T w. PCIe) but without gfx card. My previous workstations always had professional gfx cards like the QuadroFX2000 and ATI FireGL X1-256p. They worked also very well for gaming, but this time I bought a cheap PNY Verto Geforce6600GT card since at the moment I saw no reason to spend that much money for a professional gfx card. What should I say, the card also works perfectly with my CAD applications, and it's fast enough even for the latest games. It has 2x DVI outputs, has 3 years warranty, and also provides an excellent analog signal. Of course a GF6800Ultra would be faster, but not that much faster than what it is more expensive. IMHO the most attractive cards at the moment are the GF6600GTs. And in the end it's better to buy a 6600GT now and a new card in say two years than spending now the money for a 6800U and having to spend money again in 3 years because the card gets too slow... Benjamin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Hello Benjaming,
Thank you very very much, you are indeed very well informed on the subject :-) I will follow your advice and will go for the previous NVidia model 6600GT. Many thanks, Best Regards, Giovanni |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Giovanni Azua wrote:
Hello all, I have been comparing the two ATI series also the equivalent NVidia and can not figure out what are the major differences between the Workstation and Gaming series? One main difference is obvious: price tag The workstation boards are more likely to have dual DVI outputs, generally have better-quality passive components (capacitors and the like), and generally have firmware tuned for openGL rather than Direct3D. Other than that they're pretty much the same--if you compare some models of consumer and workstation board you'll find that the circuit board itself is identical. I have a DELL Worstation 670 with 64-bit extensions and PCI-Express graphic port and would like to upgrade it with the most powerful and reasonably priced Graphic Card but I am affraid of selecting the cheaper Gaming models serie and then realizing it would not perform as well as the Workstation model ... My needs? - Software Development Unless you're developing graphics-intensive software the video board makes little difference here, and if you are it should be typical of what you expect your target market to be using. - Database Development Video board makes _no_ difference. - Gaming :-) Half-Life 2/Counter-Strike/AOM/etc Definitely do not want a workstation board for this. - No CAD applications Removes the compatibility-with-CAD issue. - Support for different OS(s): XP, Linux, Unix, Solaris 4 Intel. This may end up the decision-making driver. Just about everything supports XP. ATI and nvidia take different approaches to Linux support--nvidia's is closed-source but pretty much fully supports the capabilities of their chips, ATI has a closed-source driver that's so-so and on an intermittent basis works with the developer community to allow open-source support for their chips, but it generally doesn't happen while the chip is current. So for Linux, if politics is more important to you than performance you'd want to go ATI, while if performance is more important than politics you'd be better off to go nvidia. Solaris you're likely on your own. As for Unix, don't encourage SCO. My Workstation shipped bundled with an ATI Fire V3100 I did not want to ask DELL for a different one because they would most likely overprice it, I decided to get the cheapest bundled from DELL and upgrade later on. TIA, Best Regards, Giovanni -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Hello Clarke,
Many thanks for your exhaustive response! I have had second thoughts about buying a previous cheaper version of NVidia or ATI e.g. NVidia ASUS N6600GT 128MB, instead of upgrading to this one I would rather stay with my current Fire V3100 4 pixel pipelines 128MB ... if I want an upgrade I want an upgrade :-) Actually checking more in details the NVidia vs ATI I found that ATI has more appealing numbers i.e. "ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum" clock rate 520Mhz "ATI Radeon X850 XT Platinum" clock rate 540Mhz vs "NVidia 6800 Ultra" clock rate 400Mhz Which somehow contradicts with your judgement that NVidia is usually faster than ATI ... funnily I loaded my 3DMark project for their latest benchmarking (I got 1180 score) and reviewing others saw the topmost 12K score being NVidia 6800 Ultra, perhaps very few people have bought ATI latest already ... When the comparison comes to drivers availability I think this changes continuosly ... I think is better getting the most powerful card and wait for the drivers to upgrade than getting great drivers support but then stay with the desire of having the fastest card :-) What do you think? Best Regards, Giovanni PS: Playing Counter-Strike with ATI V3100 (latest drivers XP) is really frustrating ... the lagging is noticeably horrible. "J. Clarke" wrote This may end up the decision-making driver. Just about everything supports XP. ATI and nvidia take different approaches to Linux support--nvidia's is closed-source but pretty much fully supports the capabilities of their chips, ATI has a closed-source driver that's so-so and on an intermittent basis works with the developer community to allow open-source support for their chips, but it generally doesn't happen while the chip is current. So for Linux, if politics is more important to you than performance you'd want to go ATI, while if performance is more important than politics you'd be better off to go nvidia. Solaris you're likely on your own. As for Unix, don't encourage SCO. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks again for your assistance ... I had the NVidia GeForce 6600GT card yesterday in front of me ... but what made me hesitate before buying it was the fact that it only includes 128MB instead of 256MB. I know that more is not necessarily better but I wonder if the lack of 128MB would impact my experience gaming? at the end I can not know how much of this RAM is being actually used? by e.g. Counter-Strike, Half Life 2 ... I have also searched all over internet and did not find any GeForce 6600 featuring 256MB ... Price-wise the difference is very heavy specially here in Switzerland: NVidia GeForce 6600GT : 300CHF Nvidia GeForce 6800 xxx: +700CHF meaning +350USD difference ... Any ideas? I would also like to know if you have any brand opinion I would say ASUS is the best one ... isn't it? Best Regards, Giovanni |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fx 5200 sweet deal but will it work ? | Skybuck Flying | Nvidia Videocards | 20 | May 12th 04 05:31 PM |
Problem with monitor or graphic card | Gustav | Nvidia Videocards | 3 | April 2nd 04 10:03 PM |
Question about MAYA, graphic card, and motherboard | Steve | General | 0 | September 27th 03 09:54 AM |
Slightly OT...gaming video card question | Pug Fugley | Overclocking AMD Processors | 14 | September 26th 03 11:02 PM |
ATIAIW750064A card questions... | NightRunner | Ati Videocards | 1 | July 13th 03 08:20 PM |