A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Video Cards » Nvidia Videocards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Can't use higher resolution with Topcon 10" monitor



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 1st 05, 05:06 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.video,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Can't use higher resolution with Topcon 10" monitor

The key just might be the 800x600 interlace vs non interlace setting on the
video card. The last time I got into this sort of thing, the video card
settings (Whatever the ATI video card was at the time) did not include a
setting for interlace/non interlace until it was set to TV compatable
resolutions.

"Phil Weldon" wrote in message
nk.net...
But what did you SEE at the shop? The signal may have been 800 X 600, but
the detail was considerably less.
What do you expect to use this monitor for? That information might help

me
give a clearer explanation.
The display card used doesn't make a difference as long as the refresh

rate
can be set low enough, and interlace can be selected. What you bought is

a
very limited monitor completely unsuited for text display at 800 X 600.

It
might be suitable for NTSC or PAL resolution, but 800 X 600 ditigal images
will be considerabally degraded.

Phil Weldon

"emil_lam" wrote in message
oups.com...
| The staff did show me the monitor's image at 800x600 resolution. I've
| checked that by right click at desktop then select properties (Display
| properties tab). At Settings tab, it showed 800x600 at 32 bit color.
| That staff already told me the maximum resolution is 800x600 and I
| expect that.
|
| But I haven't checked the display card used by that shop.
|




  #12  
Old December 1st 05, 05:35 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.video,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Can't use higher resolution with Topcon 10" monitor


Phil Weldon 寫道:

But what did you SEE at the shop? The signal may have been 800 X 600, but
the detail was considerably less.


I saw windows XP display setting telling the monitor was at 800x600, 32
bit color quality. The display resolution was clear better than
standard VGA mode.

What do you expect to use this monitor for? That information might help me
give a clearer explanation.


I reserved one PC for P2P downloading function so I don't need a high
end PC (PII PC). I don't need a high 1024x768 resolution screen. The PC
was old so its size (limited by main case size) couldn't be shrinked
but the monitor could. Actually now I have one 15" monitor shared by 2
old PCs but since I will move this P2P purpose PC to another location,
I need a separate monitor which size is expected as small as possible.

The display card used doesn't make a difference as long as the refresh rate
can be set low enough, and interlace can be selected. What you bought isa
very limited monitor completely unsuited for text display at 800 X 600. It
might be suitable for NTSC or PAL resolution, but 800 X 600 ditigal images
will be considerabally degraded.


Then how to explain what's seen in the shop ? What I saw told me it
could support 800x600 resolution without quality degrade. May be as you
said I need to go back the shop and clarify something. I'll do this
later.


Phil Weldon


  #13  
Old December 1st 05, 06:36 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.video,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Can't use higher resolution with Topcon 10" monitor

Let me summarize up the story here (hope it's not too lengthy ;)

1. At 29-Nov-05, I bought a 2nd hand 10" monitor (Topcon VS-10S) from
shop. I intended to use it to connect my PII PC (P2L97

motherboard) w/ NVIDIA RIVA TNT display card & XP Professional
installed.

2. I could get normal VGA display from 10" monitor connected to PII PC.

Tested WinXP display setting: 640x480, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq.,
PnP monitor (normal output)
Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq.,
PnP monitor (messy output)

3. Display output was turned into messy as I change the display setting
to value other than 640x480, others kept unchanged.

4. First posted message here.

5. At 30-Nov-05, I connected the 10" monitor to my Althon PC
(MP-7VIP-DR-LE motherboard) w/ winFast S610 AGP display card

(called it NVIDIA GeForce 2DDR in previous messages) w/ ME & XP
Professional installed in C: & D: respectively. Display

driver used that available from XP.

6. Replied messages here.

7. I booted the Althon PC into XP. Then I tried changed display setting
from 1024x768 to 800x600, display output turned into

a mess.

Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq.,
PnP monitor (messy output)
Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 70Hz vert. freq.,
PnP monitor (messy output)
Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 72Hz vert. freq.,
PnP monitor (messy output)
Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 75Hz vert. freq.,
PnP monitor (messy output)

Note: above setting was changed by connecting PC with my Samsung
SyncMaster 151B LCD monitor then swapped connection to 10"

monitor after setting effective.

During the test, I've called the shop on phone, they reminded me to
make sure vert. freq. was at 60Hz.

8. Discussed case with Phil here.

9. At 1-Nov-05, I tried connect the 10" monitor to my 3rd PC, also a
PII PC (P2L97 motherboard) w/ WinFast 3D L2300 AGP

display card w/ XP Home installed. Display driver used that available
from XP.

10. I tested below WinXP display settings, tests failed.

Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq.,
PnP monitor (messy output)
Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 70Hz vert. freq.,
PnP monitor (messy output)
Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 72Hz vert. freq.,
PnP monitor (messy output)
Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 75Hz vert. freq.,
PnP monitor (messy output)

Note: this PC was connected to NEC MultiSync V520 while changing
display setting.

11. I went to the shop again by 1-Nov-05 evening, the staff tested my
10" monitor at their PC, no problem at all at 800x600,

60Hz vert. freq.

I checked from XP display properties, they used Matrox Millennium 550G
display card with dual display output, one connected

to original Philips 105S monitor, another to this 10" monitor.

I asked them why will that happened. They had no idea. One guy
suggested me re-installed display driver (may be it's not

update). What a suggestion !!!

Finally they gave me another Topcon 10" monitor (called it NEW 10" MON
below).

12. I tested the NEW 10" MON at my Althon PC with below display
setting:

800x600, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq., PnP monitor (messy output)

13. Suddenly, I remembered this PC also has ME installed. So I booted
into ME & ran the tests again. Test failed with below

settings:

Tested WinME display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq.,
SyncMaster 151B monitor (messy output)

14. At this point, I almost gave up. I tried it again in my PII PC w/
WinFast 3D L2300 display card using below setting:

Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 16 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq.,
PnP monitor (normal output)

Bingo!

15. I changed the setting to 32 bit color, I could see normal output
too!

16. I repeated the test again at Althon PC w/ XP booted. Firstly I used
800x600, 16 bit color, test successful. Then I

changed the color to 32 bit with no problem.

17. While my PII PC w/ WinFast 3D L2300 display card still had 800x600,
32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq., PnP monitor setting

effective, I plugged the NEW 10" MON again to this PC. Bingo! Display
output was normal, no need to change setting to 16 bit

color first.

18. Test finished.

Up to now, I still can't provide a explanation for this strange
behaviour. I only know that lower the color depth first for

this 10" monitor first is a safe setting.

PS: I'm not sure if I had tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 16 bit
color, 60Hz vert. freq., PnP monitor (messy output) at step 7. But even
if I did, I'd tested it after using 32 bit color setting.

  #14  
Old December 1st 05, 07:08 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.video,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Can't use higher resolution with Topcon 10" monitor

Thanks very much for posting your further tests and the successful results.
That will be a big help for others with similar problems.

Could you restate what does work?

I get the impression that only the lower color depth works (16 bit rather
than 32 bit). Is this correct? I should have asked you to describe 'messy'
better. Evidently the problem is with bandwidth rather than sync, and your
'messy' meant fuzzy and ghosty with strange contrast rather than crawling
streaks and a disorganized image. Is this a correct statement?

Phil Weldon

"emil_lam" wrote in message
oups.com...
| Let me summarize up the story here (hope it's not too lengthy ;)
|
| 1. At 29-Nov-05, I bought a 2nd hand 10" monitor (Topcon VS-10S) from
| shop. I intended to use it to connect my PII PC (P2L97
|
| motherboard) w/ NVIDIA RIVA TNT display card & XP Professional
| installed.
|
| 2. I could get normal VGA display from 10" monitor connected to PII PC.
|
| Tested WinXP display setting: 640x480, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq.,
| PnP monitor (normal output)
| Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq.,
| PnP monitor (messy output)
|
| 3. Display output was turned into messy as I change the display setting
| to value other than 640x480, others kept unchanged.
|
| 4. First posted message here.
|
| 5. At 30-Nov-05, I connected the 10" monitor to my Althon PC
| (MP-7VIP-DR-LE motherboard) w/ winFast S610 AGP display card
|
| (called it NVIDIA GeForce 2DDR in previous messages) w/ ME & XP
| Professional installed in C: & D: respectively. Display
|
| driver used that available from XP.
|
| 6. Replied messages here.
|
| 7. I booted the Althon PC into XP. Then I tried changed display setting
| from 1024x768 to 800x600, display output turned into
|
| a mess.
|
| Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq.,
| PnP monitor (messy output)
| Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 70Hz vert. freq.,
| PnP monitor (messy output)
| Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 72Hz vert. freq.,
| PnP monitor (messy output)
| Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 75Hz vert. freq.,
| PnP monitor (messy output)
|
| Note: above setting was changed by connecting PC with my Samsung
| SyncMaster 151B LCD monitor then swapped connection to 10"
|
| monitor after setting effective.
|
| During the test, I've called the shop on phone, they reminded me to
| make sure vert. freq. was at 60Hz.
|
| 8. Discussed case with Phil here.
|
| 9. At 1-Nov-05, I tried connect the 10" monitor to my 3rd PC, also a
| PII PC (P2L97 motherboard) w/ WinFast 3D L2300 AGP
|
| display card w/ XP Home installed. Display driver used that available
| from XP.
|
| 10. I tested below WinXP display settings, tests failed.
|
| Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq.,
| PnP monitor (messy output)
| Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 70Hz vert. freq.,
| PnP monitor (messy output)
| Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 72Hz vert. freq.,
| PnP monitor (messy output)
| Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 75Hz vert. freq.,
| PnP monitor (messy output)
|
| Note: this PC was connected to NEC MultiSync V520 while changing
| display setting.
|
| 11. I went to the shop again by 1-Nov-05 evening, the staff tested my
| 10" monitor at their PC, no problem at all at 800x600,
|
| 60Hz vert. freq.
|
| I checked from XP display properties, they used Matrox Millennium 550G
| display card with dual display output, one connected
|
| to original Philips 105S monitor, another to this 10" monitor.
|
| I asked them why will that happened. They had no idea. One guy
| suggested me re-installed display driver (may be it's not
|
| update). What a suggestion !!!
|
| Finally they gave me another Topcon 10" monitor (called it NEW 10" MON
| below).
|
| 12. I tested the NEW 10" MON at my Althon PC with below display
| setting:
|
| 800x600, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq., PnP monitor (messy output)
|
| 13. Suddenly, I remembered this PC also has ME installed. So I booted
| into ME & ran the tests again. Test failed with below
|
| settings:
|
| Tested WinME display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq.,
| SyncMaster 151B monitor (messy output)
|
| 14. At this point, I almost gave up. I tried it again in my PII PC w/
| WinFast 3D L2300 display card using below setting:
|
| Tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 16 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq.,
| PnP monitor (normal output)
|
| Bingo!
|
| 15. I changed the setting to 32 bit color, I could see normal output
| too!
|
| 16. I repeated the test again at Althon PC w/ XP booted. Firstly I used
| 800x600, 16 bit color, test successful. Then I
|
| changed the color to 32 bit with no problem.
|
| 17. While my PII PC w/ WinFast 3D L2300 display card still had 800x600,
| 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq., PnP monitor setting
|
| effective, I plugged the NEW 10" MON again to this PC. Bingo! Display
| output was normal, no need to change setting to 16 bit
|
| color first.
|
| 18. Test finished.
|
| Up to now, I still can't provide a explanation for this strange
| behaviour. I only know that lower the color depth first for
|
| this 10" monitor first is a safe setting.
|
| PS: I'm not sure if I had tested WinXP display setting: 800x600, 16 bit
| color, 60Hz vert. freq., PnP monitor (messy output) at step 7. But even
| if I did, I'd tested it after using 32 bit color setting.
|


  #15  
Old December 1st 05, 07:41 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.video,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Can't use higher resolution with Topcon 10" monitor


Phil Weldon 寫道:

Thanks very much for posting your further tests and the successful results.
That will be a big help for others with similar problems.

Could you restate what does work?


WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq., PnP
monitor
WinXP display setting: 800x600, 16 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq., PnP
monitor

These settings worked on both my Althon & PII PC (not included that
mentioned at step 1 because that PC got disk read problem before XP
even started after my failed tests at 29-Nov-05 night).

I haven't tested these settings in ME installation yet because it's
late night now here. At first I thought setting 16 bit color triggered
the result. Later I doubt this "finding" because after step 17. I did
rebooted the PII PC again with NEW 10" MON connected from start to end
of reboot without changing color depth at all and nothing abnormal
appeared in graphics output at all. So I couldn't explain the result of
step 12.


I get the impression that only the lower color depth works (16 bit rather
than 32 bit). Is this correct? I should have asked you to describe 'messy'


I thought so at first but found 32 bit also worked (described in steps
15-17) later.

better. Evidently the problem is with bandwidth rather than sync, and your
'messy' meant fuzzy and ghosty with strange contrast rather than crawling
streaks and a disorganized image. Is this a correct statement?


Sorry for my poor English (not my mother language). I meant I saw
duplicated & fuzzy ghost images of windows desktop screen overlapping
each other across the screen.


Phil Weldon


  #16  
Old December 2nd 05, 01:16 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.video,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Can't use higher resolution with Topcon 10" monitor

'emil_lam' wrote, in part:
| Could you restate what does work?
|
| WinXP display setting: 800x600, 32 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq., PnP
| monitor
| WinXP display setting: 800x600, 16 bit color, 60Hz vert. freq., PnP
| monitor
|
| These settings worked on both my Althon & PII PC (not included that
| mentioned at step 1 because that PC got disk read problem before XP
| even started after my failed tests at 29-Nov-05 night).
_____

As 'Chuck' posted in this thread, the key factor may be a setting to
'interlace' rather than 'non-interlace.' That would fit | your description
of the image, and it could be that 'interlace' has now been selected.

Glad it is working for you. How good is the text image?

Phil Weldon

"emil_lam" wrote in message
oups.com...
..
..
..


  #17  
Old December 2nd 05, 10:17 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.video,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Can't use higher resolution with Topcon 10" monitor


Chuck 寫道:

The key just might be the 800x600 interlace vs non interlace setting on the
video card. The last time I got into this sort of thing, the video card
settings (Whatever the ATI video card was at the time) did not include a
setting for interlace/non interlace until it was set to TV compatable
resolutions.

I don't know because I've no idea of how to change interlace setting
for my video cards, or if they are available for user configuration. Do
you mean some video cards will change to interlace mode automatically
for some TV compatible resolution like 800x600 ? Can't get your meaning.

  #18  
Old December 2nd 05, 10:20 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.video,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Can't use higher resolution with Topcon 10" monitor

But I've no idea of how to change the interlace setting unless the
video cards do it automatically for me.

Anyway, after changing the resolution, more icons & window content
could be displayed on screen compared with 640x480. Image was clear &
I'm happy with that.

  #19  
Old December 2nd 05, 11:43 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.video,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Can't use higher resolution with Topcon 10" monitor

I'm glad the problem is gone.
The interlace vs. non interlace issue was one that was most prevalent at the
800x600 resolution and analog monitors of old design or limited screen size.
A 10" monitor falls into one and possibly both. Another possible issue had
to do with the video card output signals and timing. I'm not sure how to
explain this, but some displays can "talk" digitally to the video card and
it's drivers. This can cause the video card to setup/tweak timing to match
the display. If an incompatable timing was setup, this might explain some
of your problems and results. If the display uses an older setup scheme,
such as an .inf file, the tweaking is generally done within it.


"emil_lam" wrote in message
oups.com...
But I've no idea of how to change the interlace setting unless the
video cards do it automatically for me.

Anyway, after changing the resolution, more icons & window content
could be displayed on screen compared with 640x480. Image was clear &
I'm happy with that.



  #20  
Old December 5th 05, 01:26 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.video,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Can't use higher resolution with Topcon 10" monitor


"emil_lam" wrote in message
oups.com...
But I've no idea of how to change the interlace setting unless the
video cards do it automatically for me.

Anyway, after changing the resolution, more icons & window content
could be displayed on screen compared with 640x480. Image was clear &
I'm happy with that.


Probably the monitor worked at 800 by 600 56 Hz refresh - that was a
common refresh rate when Win95/98 was around. Also sounds like the
monitor does not have "plug-n-play" (EDID) capability, so you have to
set it manually. Try setting refresh to 56 Hz. 'Course it will have some
flicker, but that's the price of using the old cheapie....

NGA


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PB Monitor resolution prob John Packard Bell Computers 1 January 6th 05 10:32 PM
Best monitor resolution? Richard Dower Homebuilt PC's 9 December 3rd 04 05:16 AM
Flat Panel Monitor Resolution question Piranah General Hardware 0 August 21st 04 11:55 PM
strange monitor phenomenon Vanguard General 0 July 26th 03 05:21 PM
please help ! Samsung digital monitor went dark at 600x800 resolution Great Weather Asus Motherboards 3 July 11th 03 03:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.