If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Buying Kingston RAM chips...
Hi group,
The present situation here at work is that almost half the people work on newer, powerful machines, and the others have less powerful, older machines. To be more precise, this mostly concerns Compaq Deskpro's with Pentium II/III processors ranging from 300 to 700 Mhz. Since it seems not very likely that there will be a total upgrade soon, I was thinking of buying extra memory chips for these older machines, since they all still run on 64MB. I was planning to order chips from Kingston (http://www.kingston.com), since the majority of the machines already have Kingston chips, but I'm a bit concerned for compatibility. Some questions: - will these guys deliver me the right kind of chip for each machine? Anyone experiences with Kingston regarding this? I understand Compaq is quite sensitive for incompatibilities, so I guess I should watch out. - some machines have non-Kingston chips (usually 1x64MB). Will it work if I put an extra Kingston chip in those? Or should I go for one brand per machine? Thanks for any answers, Wald |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I'd recommend crucial.com, since they will guarantee
compatibility with your machines. "Wald" wrote in message 27.12... Hi group, The present situation here at work is that almost half the people work on newer, powerful machines, and the others have less powerful, older machines. To be more precise, this mostly concerns Compaq Deskpro's with Pentium II/III processors ranging from 300 to 700 Mhz. Since it seems not very likely that there will be a total upgrade soon, I was thinking of buying extra memory chips for these older machines, since they all still run on 64MB. I was planning to order chips from Kingston (http://www.kingston.com), since the majority of the machines already have Kingston chips, but I'm a bit concerned for compatibility. Some questions: - will these guys deliver me the right kind of chip for each machine? Anyone experiences with Kingston regarding this? I understand Compaq is quite sensitive for incompatibilities, so I guess I should watch out. - some machines have non-Kingston chips (usually 1x64MB). Will it work if I put an extra Kingston chip in those? Or should I go for one brand per machine? Thanks for any answers, Wald |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The BEST solution would be...
- Take half the PC's and pull the memory out of them and put it in the other half. - Install new memory in the empty PC's. ....if PC's have three slots, you could empty 2/3's of the PC's to bring the first third up to 192meg and fill the empty PC's with new stuff. "Wald" wrote in message 27.12... Hi group, The present situation here at work is that almost half the people work on newer, powerful machines, and the others have less powerful, older machines. To be more precise, this mostly concerns Compaq Deskpro's with Pentium II/III processors ranging from 300 to 700 Mhz. Since it seems not very likely that there will be a total upgrade soon, I was thinking of buying extra memory chips for these older machines, since they all still run on 64MB. I was planning to order chips from Kingston (http://www.kingston.com), since the majority of the machines already have Kingston chips, but I'm a bit concerned for compatibility. Some questions: - will these guys deliver me the right kind of chip for each machine? Anyone experiences with Kingston regarding this? I understand Compaq is quite sensitive for incompatibilities, so I guess I should watch out. - some machines have non-Kingston chips (usually 1x64MB). Will it work if I put an extra Kingston chip in those? Or should I go for one brand per machine? Thanks for any answers, Wald |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Wald wrote in message . 127.12...
I was planning to order chips from Kingston (www.kingston.com), since the majority of the machines already have Kingston chips, but I'm a bit concerned for compatibility. - will these guys deliver me the right kind of chip for each machine? Anyone experiences with Kingston regarding this? - some machines have non-Kingston chips (usually 1x64MB). Will it work if I put an extra Kingston chip in those? Or should I go for one brand per machine? I've had very few problems using different brand memory modules and modules with different brand chips on them, but I wouldn't buy Kingston modules except locally from a dealer that gives 100% refunds because I've had compatibility problems more recent Kingston ValueRAM, and Kingston hasn't been able to explain why, and they've provided contradictory information. About six months ago, I bought some Kingston ValueRAM from OfficeMax. It had two different labels on it, KVR-PC2100DDR/256 and 266X64C25/256, assembled in USA, and it worked fine when I tested it with both www.memtest86.com and www.goldmemory.cz. But a month later I bought another module, also from OfficeMax, labelled KVR-PC2100DDR/256 and PC2100DDR/256 and assembled in China, and it failed GoldMemory in a few minutes and MemTest86 in 3-5 hours, the same bit in every bad location. I tried another one of these modules, and it also failed, but in different locations and with different bits. I tried all sorts of BIOS settings with both modules, but the only thing that eliminated all the errors was slowing the memory bus speed from 266MHz down to 200 MHz. Kingston told me that the latter part was a) exactly the same as the former, or b)slightly different than the former and not made for my mobos (ECS K7S5A and P4S5A), and they offered to exchange it for the former. I didn't feel like paying to ship something that was free after rebate, so I just got a refund from OfficeMax. A week ago, I bought yet more Kingston ValueRAM from OfficeMax, again labelled KVR-PC2100DDR/256 and PC2100DDR/256 but assembled in USA, and it worked OK with the K7S5A, but with the P4S5A the default BIOS memory speed setting of "FAST" had to be changed to "NORMAL" or "SLOW" to prevent errors. Again, Kingston offered to replace the memory, but their tech support spoke only in generalities and couldn't explain the problem. With all three types of these memory modules, the circuit boards seemed to be 100% identical, but I don't know about the chips because they had no manufacturer markings, only "32M x 8 DDR 7-1", and I think they come from different manufacturers since the print looks slightly different for each. It's important to run any memory diagnostic for several hours because the second Kingston module from the second purchase tested fine for the first few hours. Also run more than one diagnostic because GoldMemory found errors very quickly with my earlier modules while MemTest86 took forever to find any, but for my last memory module, GoldMemory passed it, even with faster BIOS settings, while MemTest86 consistently found bad bits at even the default settings. The only other DDR memory I've bought recently has been K-Byte/RK-Byte and cheap Fry's Electronics no-name stuff, and except for an early K-Byte module containing Spectec chips (Micron's brand for second-rate and used chips), it's all worked perfectly. So I'd say that Kingston can't complain about my mobos being very particular about their memory. BTW, the K-byte modules with Elixir chips (Nanya's second-rate brand) seemed to be underrated the most and tested fine except when I set all the BIOS timings at their fastest settings (BIOS limited to clock to 266 MHz max.). With all the memory I've bought, the only modules that have never given me problems were those with chips labelled with the chip maker's primary brand (i.e., Micron, not Spectec for Micron). It's important to buy from a good dealer. OfficeMax was always very accommodating with my purchases, even when they gave all my money back. But if you buy from CompUSA, expect to pay a 15% restocking fee for opened merchandise, even if every module you get from them is defective, and also expect them to claim that nothing is wrong because it passes their cheap memory tester. I've found that CompUSA will try to charge the 15% even if you didn't open the box -- they are not a very honest company. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
kony wrote in message . ..
failed GoldMemory in a few minutes and MemTest86 in 3-5 hours, the same bit in every bad location. Sounds like a motherboard problem, not a memory problem. A memory problem should have the same location, different bits, not same bit, different locations. The problem occurred at only a few addresses and never when the oldest Kingston module (KVR-266X64C25/256) or the K-byte module with Nanya/Elixir chips were tested. Did you test only the new module in same slot old module was in or all of them? I always test in every slot, if possible (my Intel i810 chipset didn't allow that for single modules), and if the module passes in all of them I then test with other modules installed as well, trying each module in every slot. I tried all sorts of BIOS settings with both modules, but the only thing that eliminated all the errors was slowing the memory bus speed from 266MHz down to 200 MHz. A week ago, I bought yet more Kingston ValueRAM, again labelled KVR-PC2100DDR/256 and PC2100DDR/256 but assembled in USA, and it worked OK with the K7S5A, but with the P4S5A the default BIOS memory speed setting of "FAST" had to be changed to "NORMAL" or "SLOW" to prevent errors. This is very significant. EXTREMELY important. You should have never set the BIOS memory to "FAST" manually If it defaulted to "FAST", it shouldn't have. It did -- two BIOSes, defaults after CMOS battery was discharged, and I have at least one FIC or Soyo mobo that uses the same setting for its BIOS (PC100 or PC66, not PC2100). Budget memory is not supposed to be able to run the FAST timings, that's WHY it's budget memory. Then why did even cheaper K-byte and no-name Fry's memory work fine that way? Some of the Fry's memory I've gotten has been really questionable, but so far, all the DDR modules have tested OK. It is incredible to me that you were trying to get Kingston to deal with this. There is nothing wrong yet you're trying to get them to upgrade your memory. Changing the timings is essentially overclocking, something which no memory manufacturer guarantees. It's incredible that you ignored what you quoted of my own message: I tried all sorts of BIOS settings with both modules, but the only thing that eliminated all the errors was slowing the memory bus speed from 266MHz down to 200 MHz. IOW I tried the _slowest_ settings as well, but the memory still failed. I did try faster settings because I once had some PC133 CAS3 memory that wouldn't work in a VIA PC100 mobo except at CAS2, but this also didn't help with the DDR. I'd never expect a manufacturer to be responsible for performance beyond specs, but memory should work fine even at the BIOS' defaults, and I'd insist on that because BIOS parameters are sometimes reset automatically. I'm not an overclocker -- the fact that my fastest computer is just an XP1800+ with a TNT2M64 card should indicate that, and the only times I've even tried overclocking was while testing memory, and that's only for curiousity (IOW if memory fails only while overclocked, I don't consider it a real failure). My concern is only about reliability. you contacted Kingston did you specifically mention that you didn't want to run the memory at it's spec'd speed, that it was only producing errors when the timings were changed? What do you think they would say to that? I said that their memory failed even at the slowest settings unless the bus was slowed to 200 MHz. They couldn't explain anything but just gave the usual sales type excuses. Suppose the following: You have memory that runs perfectly at it's spec'd speed and timings, but the motherboard is instable with memory that doesn't have a large margin of stability beyond that spec, that motherboard actually needs to run memory at a lower spec to stay stable. Which motherboards might have these issues? Any could, but it's a whole lot more likely on low-end boards like you mentioned above. In particular many ECS boards have questionable G-Luxon capacitors, which are among those considered defective by many people... I've replaced a few dozen myself and the boards worked better afterwards. The only memory modules that showed errors with these mobos were K-byte with Spectec chips and later Kingstons. These are obviously not prime memory modules because their chips are not labelled with the chip manufacturer's standard part numbers but are either used or second grade. On my K7S5A Pro and P4S5A, the Luxons are only for bypass (green with silver printing), and I don't think they're the low-ESR types, the only ones affected by the Taiwan capacitor scandal. The low-ESR ones in at least one of my ECS mobos are "Ost" brand, purple with gold printing on them, but I don't know if they're involved in the scandal. I took ESR measurements and found nothing, but I can't be sure the measurements were valid because the capacitors may be in parallel. Millions of Kingston memory modules are sold, but only a few people have problems... if it was the memory then you'd be hearing of a LOT more reports of problems. What's the varible? Motherboard, number of modules, BIOS settings. Kingston is selling junk with unlabelled chips and can't even tell me who's making their chips. Does that seem like a quality operation to you? Most people don't test their memory thoroughly before putting it to use, and in the case of one of the Kingston modules the errors occurred only above the 220MB-240MB area, so it's possible that this would rarely be used by Windows (but I don't know how Windows allocates memory). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On 5 Dec 2003 13:16:51 -0800,
(do_not_spam_me) wrote: Then why did even cheaper K-byte and no-name Fry's memory work fine that way? Some of the Fry's memory I've gotten has been really questionable, but so far, all the DDR modules have tested OK. Some may work fine because that's the situation with budget memory, some of the chips are actually capable of higher, tigher timings than others. It is only guaranteed to work at default SPD timings in a motherboard conforming to spec as well. If the motherboard isn't within spec, it may require higher quality memory... this is also a known problem with ALL nForce2 boards. It is incredible to me that you were trying to get Kingston to deal with this. There is nothing wrong yet you're trying to get them to upgrade your memory. Changing the timings is essentially overclocking, something which no memory manufacturer guarantees. It's incredible that you ignored what you quoted of my own message: I tried all sorts of BIOS settings with both modules, but the only thing that eliminated all the errors was slowing the memory bus speed from 266MHz down to 200 MHz. Sorry, I didn't draw a conclusion because "all sorts of" didn't tell us anything specific. It could be that you just happened upon a bad module... it happens, obviously it's not cost-effective for a manufacturer to do as much testing on very cheap memory. On the other hand, if the situation is reproducible with several modules it would suggest a problem with the motherboard, since many many other people use these modules without issue. IOW I tried the _slowest_ settings as well, but the memory still failed. I did try faster settings because I once had some PC133 CAS3 memory that wouldn't work in a VIA PC100 mobo except at CAS2, but this also didn't help with the DDR. Fair enough, it does sound like you did all the testing possible on that board, but it doesn't rule out the board itself. I'd never expect a manufacturer to be responsible for performance beyond specs, but memory should work fine even at the BIOS' defaults, and I'd insist on that because BIOS parameters are sometimes reset automatically. I'm not an overclocker -- the fact that my fastest computer is just an XP1800+ with a TNT2M64 card should indicate that, and the only times I've even tried overclocking was while testing memory, and that's only for curiousity (IOW if memory fails only while overclocked, I don't consider it a real failure). My concern is only about reliability. Of the low-end modules, the ones I see with the least headroom for MHz or timing increase are those with the cheaper PCB including film resistors, not surface-mount parts, like this (thought it's of a PNY PC2100 module): http://69.36.189.159/usr_1034/pny-resistors.jpg All the other Kingston PC2100 modules I've tried will do at least 166MHz @ 2.5,3,3,6 except for one that can only do ~ 145 or so, providing only 1 or two modules are used. That is in multiple motherboards of Via, Sis, and nForce chipsets. you contacted Kingston did you specifically mention that you didn't want to run the memory at it's spec'd speed, that it was only producing errors when the timings were changed? What do you think they would say to that? I said that their memory failed even at the slowest settings unless the bus was slowed to 200 MHz. They couldn't explain anything but just gave the usual sales type excuses. Unfortunately it's unlikely that you were speaking to anyone with enough technical background to help unless they forwarded the call a couple times, most likely you know a lot more about the issues than whoever you were talking to. The only memory modules that showed errors with these mobos were K-byte with Spectec chips and later Kingstons. These are obviously not prime memory modules because their chips are not labelled with the chip manufacturer's standard part numbers but are either used or second grade. What were the numbers on the chips? I may have some, or a different lot... all of those I have/had will do up to ~147Mhz, usually quite a bit higher. I'm not surprised that they're not "prime" though, given the low price. On the other hand I still think the motherboard is playing a crucial role in the instability. On my K7S5A Pro and P4S5A, the Luxons are only for bypass (green with silver printing), and I don't think they're the low-ESR types, the only ones affected by the Taiwan capacitor scandal. The low-ESR ones in at least one of my ECS mobos are "Ost" brand, purple with gold printing on them, but I don't know if they're involved in the scandal. I took ESR measurements and found nothing, but I can't be sure the measurements were valid because the capacitors may be in parallel. The green-with-silver Luxons are "supposed" to be Low-ESR, they're what's used in circuits clearly needing low-ESR caps, like for the switching regulation of the CPU. I'm sure that at least one K7S5A I've had, did have those green/silver Luxons there as well as around the memory. I've seen Ost caps fail too, but not in large enough numbers to draw a conclusion about 'em. Well, actually I do recall having to replace about 9 of the green/silver Luxons around the regulators on a K7S5A because they vented... dead board... works fine now at 150MHz FSB with ??? (I forget, some nearly FAR memory). Millions of Kingston memory modules are sold, but only a few people have problems... if it was the memory then you'd be hearing of a LOT more reports of problems. What's the varible? Motherboard, number of modules, BIOS settings. Kingston is selling junk with unlabelled chips and can't even tell me who's making their chips. Does that seem like a quality operation to you? The chips that say "Kingston" on them? I USED to know who made those... time takes it's toll on my memory... might be Toshiba chips, which have two circular mold marks near the center like this: http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/DDR-KIBAN...IBA75-OMO1.jpg Most people don't test their memory thoroughly before putting it to use, and in the case of one of the Kingston modules the errors occurred only above the 220MB-240MB area, so it's possible that this would rarely be used by Windows (but I don't know how Windows allocates memory). Don't know, maybe it's just a regoinal thing... the Kingston PC2100 modules in your region might be different than those here, which are (on average) able to do a little over 170MHz... maybe higher but I've only been using them on older boards with chipsets that aren't very stable over 180MHz anyway, so i can't draw any conclusions above 170MHz. Dave |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
kony wrote
Budget memory is not supposed to be able to run the FAST timings, that's WHY it's budget memory. Then why did even cheaper K-byte and no-name Fry's memory work fine that way? Some of the Fry's memory I've gotten has been really questionable, but so far, all the DDR modules have tested OK. Some may work fine because that's the situation with budget memory, some of the chips are actually capable of higher, tigher timings than others. It is only guaranteed to work at default SPD timings in a motherboard conforming to spec as well. If the motherboard isn't within spec, it may require higher quality memory... this is also a known problem with ALL nForce2 boards. My boards are SiS 735 and 645, and I tried not only SPD timings but slower ones, too. I think that some of the Kingston ValueRAM didn't work because Kingston, in an effort to cut costs, lowered the margin of safety of their memory. It could be that you just happened upon a bad module... it happens, obviously it's not cost-effective for a manufacturer to do as much testing on very cheap memory. I can understand one bad module (none seemed to have been returned by other customers), but two in a row, separated by several months, one soldered in China, the other in the US? I also had two bad K-byte/Spectec modules in a row. it does sound like you did all the testing possible on that board, but it doesn't rule out the board itself. True, but I also tested the first and second modules with two K7S5A boards (not K7S5A Pro) that didnt' belong to me, and they acted the same -- the oldest was fine, the newer one failed at the same address and with the same bits. These boards use the same SiS 735 chipset but had different BIOSes, and there have been hardware tweaks made with the K7S5A. Of the low-end modules, the ones I see with the least headroom for MHz for timing increase are those with the cheaper PCB including film resistors, not surface-mount parts, like this (thought it's of a PNY PC2100 module): http://69.36.189.159/usr_1034/pny-resistors.jpg All the other Kingston PC2100 modules I've tried will do at least 166MHz @ 2.5,3,3,6 except for one that can only do ~ 145 or so, providing only 1 or two modules are used. That is in multiple motherboards of Via, Sis, and nForce chipsets. I have a "free" Fry's PC133 with film resistors, but all three versions of the Kingston DDR modules had identical circuit boards with surface mount resistors. Unfortunately it's unlikely that you were speaking to anyone with enough technical background to help unless they forwarded the call a couple times, most likely you know a lot more about the issues than whoever you were talking to. They forwarded my call only once, to "second level tech support," but a few months ago I was forwarded a couple of times, but nobody ever gave me specifics. The only memory modules that showed errors with these mobos were K-byte with Spectec chips and later Kingstons. These are obviously not prime memory modules because their chips are not labelled with the chip manufacturer's standard part numbers but are either used or second grade. What were the numbers on the chips? I may have some, or a different lot... all of those I have/had will do up to ~147Mhz, usually quite a bit higher. I'm not surprised that they're not "prime" though, given the low price. On the other hand I still think the motherboard is playing a crucial role in the instability. All the Kingston DDR chips had only "32M x 8 - 7 - l" printed on them, usually very faintly (invisible except at an angle), but they were bright on the oldest module (the one that worked fine). The Spectec and Elixir chips had numbers that at least looked like something put on by chip manufacturers, the Elixers' being N2DS12H80AT-75B 201Y0XSY. The green-with-silver Luxons are "supposed" to be Low-ESR, they're what's used in circuits clearly needing low-ESR caps, like for the switching regulation of the CPU. I'm sure that at least one K7S5A I've had, did have those green/silver Luxons there as well as around the memory. I've seen Ost caps fail too, but not in large enough numbers to draw a conclusion about 'em. Well, actually I do recall having to replace about 9 of the green/silver Luxons around the regulators on a K7S5A because they vented... dead board... works fine now at 150MHz FSB with ??? (I forget, some nearly FAR memory). On my K7S5A Pro and P4S5A, the 3-phase voltage regulator has several purple/gold Ost brand capacitors around it, with only a couple of green/silver Luxons. The other voltage regulators, which seem to be the linear type because I didn't see any coils near them, have mostly black/white and green/silver Luxons. I may just get replacements the next time I order a bunch of capacitors from Mouser or Digi-Key since it's easier and cheaper to replace caps than transistors and diodes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BIOS CHIPS : New Replacement Bios Chips or re-flash | [email protected] | General | 0 | October 12th 03 09:46 PM |
New Replacement Bios Chips or re-flashing | [email protected] | General | 0 | August 29th 03 04:06 PM |
Opnion about buying vs building desktop system | Joseph | General | 3 | August 29th 03 02:45 AM |
New Replacement Bios Chips or re-flashing | [email protected] | General | 0 | August 23rd 03 05:21 PM |
Bios CHIPS NEW and re-flashed | [email protected] | General | 0 | August 22nd 03 10:47 PM |