If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DDR memory running at wrong speed?
Hey dumbass... where does it say "BINARIES" in this groups name?
Why were you so lazy that you couldn't just type what the screen said? You've knocked over 100 messages off of this group not to mention the time wasted for those on dialup trying to read you message. "James D" wrote in message om... I recently added 2x 512 sticks of memory to my system. Previously I had 2x 256 sticks. BOTH kinds are DDR266. I put the bigger size in channels A and B in banks 0 and 0. I put the old ones in channels A adn B slots 1 and 1. The 512's (according to the BIOS) are running at DDR266 while the older 256's are running at DDR333. Since the processor is only a P4 2A that will only run at 400MHz, how can these modules be running higher than supposed to? The MOBO is an Intel D865PERL. Did I put the memory in right? Someone suggesting flashing the BIOS. I prefer to do that only as a last resort as I like my system to keep running. Thanks for the help. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Unless you really care about your fellow computer users (which you don't
judging by your lame response) then pardon me. Why don't you get a ****ing high speed connection asshole! I'm just trying to get some help and you gotta be so ****ing rude. Instead of being a dickhead, why not offer some "helpful" suggestions for those who are not the almighty posters like your lame ass. Assholes like you need to be shot!!! I hope you die crossing the ****ing street or worse. "Noozer" wrote in message news:rlWEd.52095$8l.10675@pd7tw1no... Hey dumbass... where does it say "BINARIES" in this groups name? Why were you so lazy that you couldn't just type what the screen said? You've knocked over 100 messages off of this group not to mention the time wasted for those on dialup trying to read you message. "James D" wrote in message om... I recently added 2x 512 sticks of memory to my system. Previously I had 2x 256 sticks. BOTH kinds are DDR266. I put the bigger size in channels A and B in banks 0 and 0. I put the old ones in channels A adn B slots 1 and 1. The 512's (according to the BIOS) are running at DDR266 while the older 256's are running at DDR333. Since the processor is only a P4 2A that will only run at 400MHz, how can these modules be running higher than supposed to? The MOBO is an Intel D865PERL. Did I put the memory in right? Someone suggesting flashing the BIOS. I prefer to do that only as a last resort as I like my system to keep running. Thanks for the help. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
You've knocked over 100 messages off of this group
Curiosity has just got the better of me. What general message storage rules does your usenet/internet provider follow? With the two usenet/internet providers I have had over the last 9 years, (AOL for a few years, and AT&T for the rest of the time) I have never seen what you just stated. And for a side note.... his post didn't push any messages of the server on my end. Both providers I have had, go by a age rule. Anything over 20 days old gets dropped. And I have never seen a post dropped before that 20 day setting, Even when someone went nuts and posted Gigabytes of data to a non binary group. It would be interesting to know if any large usenet providers go by a size based formula to decide when to push off old post. I know some small local providers would, but Shaw.ca doesn't exactly classify as a small provider to me. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
N9WOS wrote:
You've knocked over 100 messages off of this group Curiosity has just got the better of me. What general message storage rules does your usenet/internet provider follow? With the two usenet/internet providers I have had over the last 9 years, (AOL for a few years, and AT&T for the rest of the time) I have never seen what you just stated. And for a side note.... his post didn't push any messages of the server on my end. Both providers I have had, go by a age rule. Anything over 20 days old gets dropped. And I have never seen a post dropped before that 20 day setting, Even when someone went nuts and posted Gigabytes of data to a non binary group. It would be interesting to know if any large usenet providers go by a size based formula to decide when to push off old post. I know some small local providers would, but Shaw.ca doesn't exactly classify as a small provider to me. Sorry, but Noozer has a valid point. This is a non-binaries group. Many ISPs (including mine - if I was using their server) strip binary posts from where they don't belong, which will reduce the OP's chances of receiving assistance. In the space his message took, 153 1k messages could have been posted. It is incredibly selfish to post a binary where a plain text description would have sufficed - doing so shows no consideration for anyone else. He is rude, arrogant and selfish, and I hope no one /does/ assist him. -- Facon - the artificial bacon bits you get in Pizza Hut for sprinkling on salads. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
James D wrote:
Unless you really care about your fellow computer users (which you don't judging by your lame response) then pardon me. He does care, which is why he responded like he did. You're the one who's selfish, rude, arrogant and uncaring. You care nothing for those still on dial-up (I live in the UK, and some places will never have broadband, and some folk can't afford it) Why don't you get a ****ing high speed connection asshole! See above. Broadband hasn't spread to every corner of the planet yet, you moronic ****wit. I have friends who live on the Orkneys and they'll never have it - ever. I'm just trying to get some help Yes, you need help all right (and admitting it is the first step to recovery) - unfortunately it isn't the sort of help anyone here can give you. and you gotta be so ****ing rude. He wasn't rude - *you* were. Posting a binary in a plain text group is rude, selfish and lazy. If you'd taken the time to type the details no one would have said anything. But you didn't, so you deserve everything you get. Instead of being a dickhead For the perfect definition of 'dickhead', please feel free to avail yourself of the nearest mirror. why not offer some "helpful" suggestions Why? You don't deserve any help. for those who are not the almighty posters like your lame ass. Nothing to do with being an "almighty poster" [/sic/]. Assholes like you need to be shot!!! I hope you die crossing the ****ing street or worse. Yes, I agree, arseholes do need shooting - but, as Noozer isn't an arsehole, it won't happen. For the perfect definition of 'arsehole' please avail yourself of the nearest mirror. -- Facon - the artificial bacon bits you get in Pizza Hut for sprinkling on salads. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
James D wrote:
.... snip ... Name: icon_cry.gif icon_cry.gif Type: GIF Image (image/gif) Encoding: x-uuencode Name: image100[1].jpg image100[1].jpg Type: JPEG Image (image/jpeg) Encoding: x-uuencode Please don't attach binary images in a non binary newsgroup. Those have raised the article size to about 2500 lines, and will just be stripped by the better newsgroups anyhow. What you can do is mount the images somewhere, and post their URL here. -- Chuck F ) ) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. http://cbfalconer.home.att.net USE worldnet address! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In message
"N9WOS" wrote: It would be interesting to know if any large usenet providers go by a size based formula to decide when to push off old post. Virtually all modern news servers expire based on the size of the spool rather then date. In the old days it made sense to expire by date since the feed was small enough that you could run something else on the NNTP server other then just NNTP. Today, due to the overwhelming size of the newsfeed (over 1.2TB/day), full feed news servers must be dedicated completely to news. Expiring by date means that you're expiring articles before the disk is full, resulting in the disk being underutilized. Expiring based on disk availability is much more common since it gives the maximum possible retention on a given set of hardware. -- A fool and his money are soon popular. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
James D wrote:
Unless you really care about your fellow computer users (which you don't judging by your lame response) then pardon me. Why don't you get a ****ing high speed connection asshole! I'm just trying to get some help and you gotta be so ****ing rude. Instead of being a dickhead, why not offer some "helpful" suggestions for those who are not the almighty posters like your lame ass. Assholes like you need to be shot!!! I hope you die crossing the ****ing street or worse. Not only are you an ignorant top-poster, you are also crude, boorish, a trouble maker, and probably stupid. Go away and learn some of the rules of polite society. You are unlikely to get any help around here. If someone does offer any, it is likely to be a sadistic and destructive trap anyhow after the way you have behaved. -- Chuck F ) ) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. http://cbfalconer.home.att.net USE worldnet address! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Well I appreciate your helpful suggestion cbfalconer on how to "post"
messages to newsgroups. I guess there are still a few courteous people left on the internet. I am using a newsreader program which "does not" come with instructions on "how" to post to newsgroups. As for those offended by my colorful language, I only save that for the most deserving who have to prove their betterness of the newer users. Everyone starts somewhere and I guess somehow, when one gets to the higher user status, they've forgotten they even had a starting place lower down. Please don't attach binary images in a non binary newsgroup. Those have raised the article size to about 2500 lines, and will just be stripped by the better newsgroups anyhow. What you can do is mount the images somewhere, and post their URL here. -- Chuck F ) ) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. http://cbfalconer.home.att.net USE worldnet address! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"James D" wrote in message om... Unless you really care about your fellow computer users (which you don't judging by your lame response) then pardon me. Why would I care about someone I don't know? I try to be helpful when I can... You're problem is that you don't know how to use a computer and from your previous post, you're too lazy to learn. If you want help AND to be rude at the same time, pay someone to fix your computer. rest of the lameass cursing/namecalling snipped |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can MEMTEST86+ check memory running at faster bus speed? | Shep© | General | 60 | October 20th 04 03:33 AM |
Metabench? -- Can MEMTEST86+ check memory running at faster bus speed? | Mixxy | General | 0 | October 15th 04 11:11 AM |
HELP! Having trouble with memory and bus speed | Andy in NJ | General | 12 | August 28th 04 06:05 PM |
Disk to disk copying with overclocked memory | JT | General | 30 | March 21st 04 02:22 AM |
FSB speed / Memory speed | - | General | 12 | November 12th 03 09:13 AM |