If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Doom3 Benchmarks out!
http://www2.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NjQy
Looks like the 6800GT is the sweet spot, if you can get it cheap (my pny version was $345 shipped from provantage). rms |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"rms" wrote in message
... http://www2.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NjQy Looks like the 6800GT is the sweet spot, if you can get it cheap (my pny version was $345 shipped from provantage). rms I thought it was a good article and it makes me happy I have a 9800 Pro video card. However, I can't wait to see how Doom 3 plays on systems that are a little more "real world". For example, I hope they bench it on processors 1.5GHz and up with GeForce4 MX and GeForce3 cards and up. I'd like to see an all-round comparison with as many combinations of CPU and video cards as possible. Thanks for posting that link! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:31:21 GMT, "rms"
wrote: http://www2.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NjQy Looks like the 6800GT is the sweet spot, if you can get it cheap (my pny version was $345 shipped from provantage). Yes, 6800GT seems to be a great card to buy. The only difference between this card and 6800Ultra is the clock speed. Reminds me of Ti4200 in some regards. Since I have every intention of keeping my 9800 (overclocked past Pro speeds) at least till the end of next year, I find the Fx5950 and 9800XT scores very encouraging. At 1024x768 with very high settings (4xAA, 16xAF) they are close to 30 fps and 45+ (with no AA and 8xAF). I think, my graphic card should be able to hit average of 30 fps at 1024x768 2xAA and 8xAF. That's all I need for Doom3 and the games that will be based on its engine, for now. As far as pricing of new graphic cards go, the next few months will be very interesting. -- Noman, happy with his 9800 (Pro) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
As far as pricing of new graphic cards go, the next few months will be
very interesting. -- Noman, happy with his 9800 (Pro) The last couple months saw some good price drops when the 6800 and x800 became available. Now you can get a 9800 PRO for under $200. I'm still clinging to my 5200 ultra until I am forced to part with it |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"David Besack" wrote in message ... As far as pricing of new graphic cards go, the next few months will be very interesting. -- Noman, happy with his 9800 (Pro) The last couple months saw some good price drops when the 6800 and x800 became available. Now you can get a 9800 PRO for under $200. I'm still clinging to my 5200 ultra until I am forced to part with it I follow this rule (Humga's 1st Law of Graphics Card Upgrade): Buy the new card when the performance (frame rate usually being a good measure) drops to roughly half of that of the new card. Then you must get at least **some** cash back for the 'old' card. This will ensure that you'll be able to play with your the old and new games with decent performance without costing you too much Please note that the 'new' card isn't necessarily the fastest card in the market...think about it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Humga" wrote in message ... I follow this rule (Humga's 1st Law of Graphics Card Upgrade): Pretty cool having a law named after you. ;-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"rms" wrote in message
... http://www2.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NjQy Looks like the 6800GT is the sweet spot, if you can get it cheap (my pny version was $345 shipped from provantage). They didn't bench anything older than 5950... what a bunch of clowns. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
They didn't bench anything older than 5950... what a bunch of clowns. It says in the article that a broader range of CPU and GFX cards will be checked for a future feature -- Toby |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:57:10 +1000, "Darkfalz"
wrote: "rms" wrote in message .. . http://www2.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NjQy Looks like the 6800GT is the sweet spot, if you can get it cheap (my pny version was $345 shipped from provantage). They didn't bench anything older than 5950... what a bunch of clowns. I'm wondering if the low benchmark scores on those cards are because of the heavy DX9 shader use. Since a card such as the GF4 Ti doesn't support DX9, I'm guessing the game will either switch to a DX8 code for effects, or just omit the shaders all together. If so, would that mean that a GF4 Ti might get framerates that are about the same as the DX9 cards, but just not look as good? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 04:46:24 -0500, Larry Roberts
wrote: I'm wondering if the low benchmark scores on those cards are because of the heavy DX9 shader use. iD games are OpenGL, not D3D. -- Andrew. To email unscramble & remove spamtrap. Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking a question. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Doom3 Benchmarks out! | rms | Ati Videocards | 69 | August 8th 04 02:03 AM |
P4P800 Deluxe and 5.1 Sound (Preparing for Doom3) | Eric | Asus Motherboards | 0 | July 15th 04 04:48 PM |
Question about Ti4200 benchmarks. | archagon | Nvidia Videocards | 10 | January 19th 04 05:23 AM |
confusion about doom3 vs HL2 benchmarks | Sumedh | Ati Videocards | 15 | September 16th 03 03:44 AM |
confusion about doom3 vs HL2 benchmarks | Sumedh | Nvidia Videocards | 15 | September 16th 03 03:44 AM |