If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Current crop of Nvidia cards
Has anyone read a roundup or comparison recently that compares the currently
available crops of cards from ATI and Nvidia? I'm currently running a PNY GF4 ti4200, and started researching, but I'm getting tired (and my eyes are getting blurry) of following links to dead-end comparisons that don't cover the gamut. Most of what I've seen indicates that I won't gain much more bang for my buck by replacing my 4200 without spending an ungodly amount of money. I used to buy expensive video cards, but in recent years I've become much slower about upgrading, since it seems like they keep coming out with *tiny* incremental improvements in performance. Surely someone in here has recently made a purchase, has researched this to death, and would love to share their findings. And as to what it will be used for: primary games - Neverwinter Nights, Morrowind (Bloodmoon! Lycanthropy rocks), Quake III, and a few random assorted others. One other feature that I would like to retain on a new purchase is 1024x768 capability on the TV-out. My current 4200 has this... TIA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
seems like the best bang for the buck is the 5600ultra or the ati9600pro.
I also running a 4200 and the only reason I will upgraded is when the video card becomes incompatible with the software or it goes bad. "Dismantler" wrote in message ... Has anyone read a roundup or comparison recently that compares the currently available crops of cards from ATI and Nvidia? I'm currently running a PNY GF4 ti4200, and started researching, but I'm getting tired (and my eyes are getting blurry) of following links to dead-end comparisons that don't cover the gamut. Most of what I've seen indicates that I won't gain much more bang for my buck by replacing my 4200 without spending an ungodly amount of money. I used to buy expensive video cards, but in recent years I've become much slower about upgrading, since it seems like they keep coming out with *tiny* incremental improvements in performance. Surely someone in here has recently made a purchase, has researched this to death, and would love to share their findings. And as to what it will be used for: primary games - Neverwinter Nights, Morrowind (Bloodmoon! Lycanthropy rocks), Quake III, and a few random assorted others. One other feature that I would like to retain on a new purchase is 1024x768 capability on the TV-out. My current 4200 has this... TIA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I think the current crop is a disappointment.
Your 4200 is pretty good. You really have to go by price range, not model numbers. To beat your 4200 or match it you will have to spend at least $160. $160 will get you close to what you have or just above it. When my 4200 went bad, (PNY Verto) in just under a year of ownership, I RMA's it. Took at least a month to get a replacement. I play a lot of games, so tried my built in graphics (motherboard). Useless for my games. I then got a 5200. It was a significant drop over the 4200. $100 and not worth it. I bit the bullet and got an FX5900. Now that is a major improvement! But over $250. But it will keep me going for two years at least. I would prefer ATI Radeon, but my motherboard don't like it, and PNY installs easily (I have win98se). If your games work well, keep the 4200. If you start playing games that show the limits of the 4200, step up. "Dismantler" wrote in message ... Has anyone read a roundup or comparison recently that compares the currently available crops of cards from ATI and Nvidia? I'm currently running a PNY GF4 ti4200, and started researching, but I'm getting tired (and my eyes are getting blurry) of following links to dead-end comparisons that don't cover the gamut. Most of what I've seen indicates that I won't gain much more bang for my buck by replacing my 4200 without spending an ungodly amount of money. I used to buy expensive video cards, but in recent years I've become much slower about upgrading, since it seems like they keep coming out with *tiny* incremental improvements in performance. Surely someone in here has recently made a purchase, has researched this to death, and would love to share their findings. And as to what it will be used for: primary games - Neverwinter Nights, Morrowind (Bloodmoon! Lycanthropy rocks), Quake III, and a few random assorted others. One other feature that I would like to retain on a new purchase is 1024x768 capability on the TV-out. My current 4200 has this... TIA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Dismantler" wrote in message ... Has anyone read a roundup or comparison recently that compares the currently available crops of cards from ATI and Nvidia? I'm currently running a PNY GF4 ti4200, and started researching, but I'm getting tired (and my eyes are getting blurry) of following links to dead-end comparisons that don't cover the gamut. Most of what I've seen indicates that I won't gain much more bang for my buck by replacing my 4200 without spending an ungodly amount of money. I used to buy expensive video cards, but in recent years I've become much slower about upgrading, since it seems like they keep coming out with *tiny* incremental improvements in performance. Surely someone in here has recently made a purchase, has researched this to death, and would love to share their findings. I have a 4200, and my conclusion is that it's a lot of bang for the buck, and it's not worth upgrading yet. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Agreed.
The true upgrade path is over $250. That's a lot of dough. "jeffc" wrote in message ... "Dismantler" wrote in message ... Has anyone read a roundup or comparison recently that compares the currently available crops of cards from ATI and Nvidia? I'm currently running a PNY GF4 ti4200, and started researching, but I'm getting tired (and my eyes are getting blurry) of following links to dead-end comparisons that don't cover the gamut. Most of what I've seen indicates that I won't gain much more bang for my buck by replacing my 4200 without spending an ungodly amount of money. I used to buy expensive video cards, but in recent years I've become much slower about upgrading, since it seems like they keep coming out with *tiny* incremental improvements in performance. Surely someone in here has recently made a purchase, has researched this to death, and would love to share their findings. I have a 4200, and my conclusion is that it's a lot of bang for the buck, and it's not worth upgrading yet. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Damn skippy!! Current entry FX cards are too close to MX cards. The "older"
generation 4200, 4600, still kick game butt. "jeffc" wrote in message ... "Dismantler" wrote in message ... Has anyone read a roundup or comparison recently that compares the currently available crops of cards from ATI and Nvidia? I'm currently running a PNY GF4 ti4200, and started researching, but I'm getting tired (and my eyes are getting blurry) of following links to dead-end comparisons that don't cover the gamut. Most of what I've seen indicates that I won't gain much more bang for my buck by replacing my 4200 without spending an ungodly amount of money. I used to buy expensive video cards, but in recent years I've become much slower about upgrading, since it seems like they keep coming out with *tiny* incremental improvements in performance. Surely someone in here has recently made a purchase, has researched this to death, and would love to share their findings. I have a 4200, and my conclusion is that it's a lot of bang for the buck, and it's not worth upgrading yet. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Dismantler" wrote in message
... Has anyone read a roundup or comparison recently that compares the currently available crops of cards from ATI and Nvidia? snip for brevity's sake Thanks to all for their opinions. I figured that I had not done enough research. I haven't been following new video card developments and models since buying the 4200, I thought surely they would have come up with something providing more bang for the buck by now. Looks like I'll go for upgrading my processor, memory and motherboard on this next upgrade instead! (Now straying dangerously off topic, so if you fancy yourself as the usenet police, you can stop reading here. Following comments are intended solely for the tolerant... Currently running 2400+ on Gigabyte GA-7VRXP with Corsair 512MB PC2700 CAS2 and a PNY GF4 4200ti) Haven't exactly settled on which mobo, memory combo yet to get, researching boards based on the nForce II 400 and VIA KT600 chipsets. If anyone is aware of specific and universally occurring issues with running GF4 4200's on either of these chipsets, or on a specific vendor's motherboard utilizing one of them, feel free to chime in. I'm also a bit concerned about which DDR memory is going to work specifically with these faster FSB speeds, the last time I upgraded motherboards, I ended up having to special order Corsair DDR memory, the dodgy Kingston DDR modules originally purchased gave me endless headaches and unstable operation. Any relevant suggestions from someone who has recently upgraded to a mainboard using either of these two chipsets would be welcome as well... If you would prefer not to comment about motherboards, memory, etc in the nvidia newsgroup (and I can relate if that is your predilection), you can grab my email address from the URL below and respond that way. I don't relish any more hordes of spambots heading my way G Thanks in advance. http://home.indy.rr.com/dismantler/dv/film.htm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Dismantler" wrote in message ... Thanks to all for their opinions. I figured that I had not done enough research. I haven't been following new video card developments and models since buying the 4200, I thought surely they would have come up with something providing more bang for the buck by now. You'd think so, but on the other hand pat yourself on the back. As "enthusiasts", we are always looking for the best deals - the best performance for the money - the best way to spend our money so it's not obsolete within 6 weeks - to avoid the "dumb cow consumer" syndrome where you look at a rack of new products at the local computer store and get paralyzed with ignorance and dazzled by advertising claims and slick packaging. You've done all that - congratulations :-) Unfortunately, that means it's going to take another equally good product at another good price to come along, and that doesn't happen every week. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 15:52:25 GMT, "Dismantler"
wrote: "Dismantler" wrote in message ... Has anyone read a roundup or comparison recently that compares the currently available crops of cards from ATI and Nvidia? snip for brevity's sake Thanks to all for their opinions. I figured that I had not done enough research. I haven't been following new video card developments and models since buying the 4200, I thought surely they would have come up with something providing more bang for the buck by now. Yep... stick with your Ti4200 UNTIL your games feel slow... HALO benifits from having a faster card... but that mostly because of its crappy programming. UT2003 looks better because I can turn on the AF/AA on my ATI 9800Pro that I couldn't on my Ti4200.... Wait and save for a $300 card in 2004. If you had a GF-4MX card, I and others would tell you to upgrade to a $200+ video card. Looks like I'll go for upgrading my processor, memory and motherboard on this next upgrade instead! better choice. (Now straying dangerously off topic, so if you fancy yourself as the usenet police, you can stop reading here. Following comments are intended solely for the tolerant... Currently running 2400+ on Gigabyte GA-7VRXP with Corsair 512MB PC2700 CAS2 and a PNY GF4 4200ti) Your mobo should handle a 2600+, but since you have a 2400 already... I *SEE* no reason for an upgrade at this time. I'm running a 2500OC to 2900 speed. Haven't exactly settled on which mobo, memory combo yet to get, researching boards based on the nForce II 400 and VIA KT600 chipsets. If anyone is aware NForce2 boards are sweet, it can add about 10~15% to your system performance... but is it worth it? Save for an AMD64 bit system next year - the 64bit CPUs are hitting $300 now. KT600 is slightly faster than the KT400. Your system is running good, you're performance is still UPPER END... not the fastest, but still quite good. Shesh, I've tossed on HALO on a friends AMD-1000Mhz/Ti4200 setup (hes already updated the mobo to NForce2 and about to buy a 2500CPU) and it plays it pretty good. -- Remember when real men used Real computers!? When 512K of video RAM was a lot! Death to Palladium & WPA!! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pc problems after g card upgrade + sp2 | ben reed | Homebuilt PC's | 9 | November 30th 04 02:04 AM |
my new mobo o/c's great | rockerrock | Overclocking AMD Processors | 9 | June 30th 04 08:17 PM |
Bad news for ATI: Nvidia to 'own' ATI at CeBit - no pixel shader 3.0 support in R420 (long) | NV55 | Ati Videocards | 12 | February 24th 04 07:29 AM |
Nvidia cards suck! | Peter Mollror | Ati Videocards | 17 | October 1st 03 12:22 AM |
Nvidia cards suck! | Peter Mollror | Matrox Videocards | 17 | October 1st 03 12:22 AM |