If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Killzone PS3 bull****
If the real PlayStation3 had to reproduce the E3 2005 Killzone CG in
realtime, with the same graphical fidelity, it would run at 5 frames per second or less. the only way PlayStation3 is going to "do Killzone in realtime" at 60 fps in a real game is by significantly reducing the complexity and fidelity of the graphics. *geometry *lighting *textures *anti-aliasing *and other things will *all* be cut back very significantly and very noticably. mark my words. a system that *IS* capable of reproducing Killzone CG in realtime gameplay would need: -Tens of Gigapixels per second fillrate -a few billion polygons per second geometry performance -16x or greater FSAA anti-aliasing capability -several GigaBytes of RAM -several hundred GB per second of memory bandwidth all of which the PS3 does not have. neither Cell nor RSX (nor both combined) has the kind of power that Sony and Nvidia want you to believe they have. E3 2005 Killzone CG on PlayStation4 in realtime? Sure, in 7 years or so. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Killzone PS3 bull****
"Radeon" wrote in message oups.com... Who gives a **** about Killzone on the PS3? I am enjoying the hell out of Call Of Duty 2 on my shiny new XBox 360. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Killzone PS3 bull****
Who gives a **** about xbox 360 your just an impatient son of a whoar , who
settles for second best because their to ****in impatient to wait for the ps3 , listen , if you think that just because the xbox was better than the ps2 by a bit the xbox 360 wont be better than the ps3 . those of you who are in this newsgroup do diss playsation 3 or 2 get the **** out of here .I dont give a rats ass about xbox 360 . so dont just join this newsgroup to **** people that like playstation .Oh yeah bud , you dont know **** about the ps3 and obviously are a supporter of xbox 360 so **** YOU , If you have seen the clip it looks good so I dont know what the **** you are talking about . so far all the videos I have seen for the ps3 were good and none were good for the xbox 360 because all the games out right now except call of duty 2 suck ass and look like xbox 1 games . Face it xbox 360 is full of bugs and microsoft only made xbox 360 come out earlier becaue their scared that ps3 wil be better and they have to make their fair share of the money before noone buys xbox 360 **** anymore . By the way none of you say what you did to Blig Merk that we should move on with our lives because we have we dont care about XFLOP THREE-****TY . |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Killzone PS3 bull****
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 21:51:36 -0500, "J & T"
wrote: Who gives a **** about xbox 360 your just an impatient son of a whoar , who settles for second best because their to ****in impatient to wait for the ps3 , listen , if you think that just because the xbox was better than the ps2 by a bit the xbox 360 wont be better than the ps3 . those of you who are in this newsgroup do diss playsation 3 or 2 get the **** out of here .I dont give a rats ass about xbox 360 . so dont just join this newsgroup to **** people that like playstation .Oh yeah bud , you dont know **** about the ps3 and obviously are a supporter of xbox 360 so **** YOU , If you have seen the clip it looks good so I dont know what the **** you are talking about . so far all the videos I have seen for the ps3 were good and none were good for the xbox 360 because all the games out right now except call of duty 2 suck ass and look like xbox 1 games . Face it xbox 360 is full of bugs and microsoft only made xbox 360 come out earlier becaue their scared that ps3 wil be better and they have to make their fair share of the money before noone buys xbox 360 **** anymore . By the way none of you say what you did to Blig Merk that we should move on with our lives because we have we dont care about XFLOP THREE-****TY . Left school before puberty, I see............... John Lewis |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Killzone PS3 bull****
Radeon wrote:
If the real PlayStation3 had to reproduce the E3 2005 Killzone CG in realtime, with the same graphical fidelity, it would run at 5 frames per second or less. the only way PlayStation3 is going to "do Killzone in realtime" at 60 fps in a real game is by significantly reducing the complexity and fidelity of the graphics. *geometry *lighting *textures *anti-aliasing *and other things will all be cut back very significantly and very noticably. mark my words. a system that IS capable of reproducing Killzone CG in realtime gameplay would need: -Tens of Gigapixels per second fillrate -a few billion polygons per second geometry performance -16x or greater FSAA anti-aliasing capability -several GigaBytes of RAM -several hundred GB per second of memory bandwidth all of which the PS3 does not have. neither Cell nor RSX (nor both combined) has the kind of power that Sony and Nvidia want you to believe they have. E3 2005 Killzone CG on PlayStation4 in realtime? Sure, in 7 years or so. Boy are you in for a surprise. You do know that movie was thrown together at the last minute with dev unit specs. Completely unoptomized code too. I say the game looks like that or better at runs at 60FPS. Just check out Virtua Fighter 5 which is running on an arcade board with weaker specs that the Xbox360. -- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Killzone PS3 bull****
Boy are you in for a surprise. You do know that movie was thrown together at the last minute with dev unit specs. Completely unoptomized code too. I say the game looks like that or better at runs at 60FPS. Just check out Virtua Fighter 5 which is running on an arcade board with weaker specs that the Xbox360. -- Man you are one of the most gullible people i've ever seen... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Killzone PS3 bull****
"John Lewis" wrote in message ... On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 21:51:36 -0500, "J & T" wrote: Who gives a **** about xbox 360 your just an impatient son of a whoar , who settles for second best because their to ****in impatient to wait for the ps3 , listen , if you think that just because the xbox was better than the ps2 by a bit the xbox 360 wont be better than the ps3 . those of you who are in this newsgroup do diss playsation 3 or 2 get the **** out of here .I dont give a rats ass about xbox 360 . so dont just join this newsgroup to **** people that like playstation .Oh yeah bud , you dont know **** about the ps3 and obviously are a supporter of xbox 360 so **** YOU , If you have seen the clip it looks good so I dont know what the **** you are talking about . so far all the videos I have seen for the ps3 were good and none were good for the xbox 360 because all the games out right now except call of duty 2 suck ass and look like xbox 1 games . Face it xbox 360 is full of bugs and microsoft only made xbox 360 come out earlier becaue their scared that ps3 wil be better and they have to make their fair share of the money before noone buys xbox 360 **** anymore . By the way none of you say what you did to Blig Merk that we should move on with our lives because we have we dont care about XFLOP THREE-****TY . Left school before puberty, I see............... LMAO! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Killzone PS3 bull****
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Killzone PS3 bull****
In article , Unknown says...
Radeon wrote: If the real PlayStation3 had to reproduce the E3 2005 Killzone CG in realtime, with the same graphical fidelity, it would run at 5 frames per second or less. the only way PlayStation3 is going to "do Killzone in realtime" at 60 fps in a real game is by significantly reducing the complexity and fidelity of the graphics. *geometry *lighting *textures *anti-aliasing *and other things will all be cut back very significantly and very noticably. mark my words. a system that IS capable of reproducing Killzone CG in realtime gameplay would need: -Tens of Gigapixels per second fillrate -a few billion polygons per second geometry performance -16x or greater FSAA anti-aliasing capability -several GigaBytes of RAM -several hundred GB per second of memory bandwidth all of which the PS3 does not have. neither Cell nor RSX (nor both combined) has the kind of power that Sony and Nvidia want you to believe they have. E3 2005 Killzone CG on PlayStation4 in realtime? Sure, in 7 years or so. Boy are you in for a surprise. I'm sure the game will look great but I don't recall any Playstation game ever living up to the Sony hype movies for the PS1 or the PS2. I'm sure the PS3 will be no different. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Killzone PS3 bull****
In article , Unknown says...
Radeon wrote: If the real PlayStation3 had to reproduce the E3 2005 Killzone CG in realtime, with the same graphical fidelity, it would run at 5 frames per second or less. the only way PlayStation3 is going to "do Killzone in realtime" at 60 fps in a real game is by significantly reducing the complexity and fidelity of the graphics. *geometry *lighting *textures *anti-aliasing *and other things will all be cut back very significantly and very noticably. mark my words. a system that IS capable of reproducing Killzone CG in realtime gameplay would need: -Tens of Gigapixels per second fillrate -a few billion polygons per second geometry performance -16x or greater FSAA anti-aliasing capability -several GigaBytes of RAM -several hundred GB per second of memory bandwidth all of which the PS3 does not have. neither Cell nor RSX (nor both combined) has the kind of power that Sony and Nvidia want you to believe they have. E3 2005 Killzone CG on PlayStation4 in realtime? Sure, in 7 years or so. Boy are you in for a surprise. Yeah we are in for a surprise. I've yet to see a game live up to one of Sony's hype movies. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No bullshit! no credit card verification! FREE registration and earn money NOW! | [email protected] | Storage (alternative) | 0 | March 19th 05 06:29 AM |
120 gb is the Largest hard drive I can put in my 4550? | David H. Lipman | Dell Computers | 65 | December 11th 03 01:51 PM |
hard drive backups with RAID 0 | Joep | Storage (alternative) | 23 | July 28th 03 09:23 PM |
Slightly odd HD problem | Li'l ol' me | Storage (alternative) | 24 | July 10th 03 08:10 PM |