If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How to Connect Two Fibre Channel Initiators
If you want to connect two fibre channel initiators together and have them
exchange information over fibre channel, does this require you to use a switch between them? I'm used to connecting initiators to targets, and I've never had to deal with connecting two initiators. I'm not clear on whether the fibre channel model has a way to accomodate two directly attached initiators so that they can synch lock to each other. My application is IBM FICON, but that is close enough to fibre channel that I'm asking the question in terms of fibre channel since many more people will be familiar with fibre channel. The application here is to have two IBM mainframes connect their channels to each other in order to copy data from one mainframe to the other using FICON. In this model, both mainframes are initiators, and to do a channel to channel copy I just want to understand the theory about whether you should be able to direct connect FICON on one side to FICON on the other side without introducing a switch between the two initiators. -- Will |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Will wrote:
If you want to connect two fibre channel initiators together and have them exchange information over fibre channel, does this require you to use a switch between them? I'm used to connecting initiators to targets, and I've never had to deal with connecting two initiators. I'm not clear on whether the fibre channel model has a way to accomodate two directly attached initiators so that they can synch lock to each other. My application is IBM FICON, but that is close enough to fibre channel that I'm asking the question in terms of fibre channel since many more people will be familiar with fibre channel. The application here is to have two IBM mainframes connect their channels to each other in order to copy data from one mainframe to the other using FICON. In this model, both mainframes are initiators, and to do a channel to channel copy I just want to understand the theory about whether you should be able to direct connect FICON on one side to FICON on the other side without introducing a switch between the two initiators. there is no such thing as fibre channel initiator. FC is used to transport other protocols (SCSI, IP ...), and FC "initiator" is usually SCSI initiator. If you use IP over FC, you don't have (iirc) any initiator. FC topology is not connected to protocols transported over FC (so you can have point-to-point, AL, or fabric connection if your FC implementation supports them all). iirc if you use FICON, you transfer something called "single byte command sets" over FC. I don't know, if you can connect two servers directly to transfer data using FICON, but if you can, it shouldn't be dependent on FC topology (assuming that your FICON cards can use any topology other than switch connect - you can check it up in manual - can you interface disks to server directly, or only through switch?) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will a Compaq Storage System U2 accept a fibre channel raid controller? | Kevin Howatt | Storage & Hardrives | 0 | February 4th 05 02:41 AM |
Active / Stanby connection to fibre channel robotic control | Wanni | Storage & Hardrives | 0 | November 19th 04 09:12 AM |
SAN (Storage Area Network) Security FAQ Revision 2004/10/30 - Part 1/1 | Will Spencer | Storage & Hardrives | 0 | October 30th 04 08:35 AM |
HDTV wonder & channel resolution | nobody | Ati Videocards | 3 | August 30th 04 04:17 AM |
Primary IDE channel won't recognize ANYTHING | zuk999 | Asus Motherboards | 6 | January 12th 04 10:51 PM |