If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
XP 2400+ Thouroughbred Vs. XP 2400 Palomino
I'll top post this just for you.
That's utterly rediculous. Now try and figure out which one of your 4 paragraphs I'm responding to.:-) On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:44:33 +0000, Buffalo wrote: "Stacey" : Dumb****.. http://www.dickalba.demon.co.uk/usen.../faq_topp.html http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/gey_stv0.htm http://www.google.com/search?q=usene...te+top-posting -- Stacey Well, you're a real piece of work. Here's a quote from your top link: " But if you place all your comments at the top, the reader has to scroll down the page and hunt to see what it is you are replying to. I, and most other newsgroup regulars, tend to ignore people who make it too much hard work to figure out what it is they have to say. If you deliberately make it difficult for people to understand you, you shouldn't really be too surprised or disappointed when they don't respond." I use OE and when I follow a longer post, It makes it more difficult, takes more time and more work to keep scrolling down through all the 'garbage' that the 'bottom posting' replier was too lazy to remove . Now if the replier had 'top posted' I don't have to scroll down at all. That's why I disagree with the above quoted statement. Just because someone else says it (maybe they use a different NG reader) doesn't make it easier for me or necessarily right. So, if you're using OE, then top posting in threads is usually much easier and faster to follow. MTCW. PS: I bottom posted just for you. :-) -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core 2100+ CPU @2400MHz http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
XP 2400+ Thouroughbred Vs. XP 2400 Palomino
Wes Newell wrote:
Me too I'll top post this just for you. As a matter of fact That's utterly rediculous. why not just Now try and figure out which one of your 4 paragraphs I'm responding to.:-) spead it all On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:44:33 +0000, Buffalo wrote: over the page. "Stacey" : Dumb****.. http://www.dickalba.demon.co.uk/usen.../faq_topp.html http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/gey_stv0.htm http://www.google.com/search?q=usene...te+top-posting -- Stacey Well, you're a real piece of work. Here's a quote from your top link: " But if you place all your comments at the top, the reader has to scroll down the page and hunt to see what it is you are replying to. I, and most other newsgroup regulars, tend to ignore people who make it too much hard work to figure out what it is they have to say. If you deliberately make it difficult for people to understand you, you shouldn't really be too surprised or disappointed when they don't respond." I use OE and when I follow a longer post, It makes it more difficult, takes more time and more work to keep scrolling down through all the 'garbage' that the 'bottom posting' replier was too lazy to remove . Bingo only a DUMB **** doesn't know how to delete the crap. Now if the replier had 'top posted' I don't have to scroll down at all. That's why I disagree with the above quoted statement. Just because someone else says it (maybe they use a different NG reader) doesn't make it easier for me or necessarily right. So, if you're using OE, then top posting in threads is usually much easier and faster to follow. MTCW. PS: I bottom posted just for you. :-) Thanx... This is SO much easier to read isn't it? -- Stacey |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dell PowerEdge 2400 drivers | LightLady110 | General | 4 | March 21st 05 05:33 PM |
How to Install a PCI Video Card in a Dell Dimension 2400 | Tim | Dell Computers | 2 | February 9th 04 03:10 AM |
Palomino 1600+ default mult >=13 ? | Arnold Z. | Overclocking AMD Processors | 1 | August 15th 03 09:18 PM |
XP 2400+ Thouroughbred Vs. XP 2400 Palomino | Wes Newell | Overclocking AMD Processors | 3 | June 30th 03 07:53 AM |
XP 2400+ Thouroughbred Vs. XP 2400 Palomino | Wes Newell | AMD Thunderbird Processors | 0 | June 29th 03 12:29 PM |