If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best fitting video card: NVIDIA (which brand?) or ATI (Sapphire)?
Hi all, I have the following system:
2 x Pentium III 866 MHz 1 GB of RDRAM PC600 with ECC 1 x 18.2 GB SCSI hard drive spinning at 10,000 rpm 4X (AGP 2.0) slot 375W PSU I'd like to play Guild Wars, watching videos and doing photo editing. Right now, I have a 3DLabs Oxygen GVX1 video card (nearly $ 1000 dollars back in 1999 or 2000). It's an high quality card and offers an excellent video quality and color fidelity. Anyway, it's an old card and not compliant even with DirectX 8.0. On the other hand I've a GeForce MX 440 with 64 MB of RAM, Sparkle branded. It's noticeably better for games, but has a terrible output quality. For example: even the Windows XP colors looks a bit odd compared to the output I get with other computer (or the 3DLabs card) and font seems out of focus (I don't have antialiasing enabled). I don't know if it's by design or if the card is degradated. Due to the problems with card by Sparkle and the age of the one by 3DLabs, I've good reasons to buy a faster video card. Since the processing power of the two CPU isn't that impressive (and neither the amount of money in my pocket, for that matter) I'm watching to low budget card for the AGP market segment. GeForce 6200A (NV44A) has native support for AGP wich reduces cost (no need for AGP-PCIE signals converter) and the memory bus stripped down to 64 bit. The amount of memory is 128 MB or 256 MB, usually running at a clock speed of 400 MHz. I could get a card with this GPU for: - ? 42 by XFX (128 MB, 400 MHz) - ? 52 by XFX (256 MB, 400 MHz) - ? 57 by Sparkle (256 MB, 400 MHz... but since the card by Sparkle I have gives me that problem I simply don't trust the brand) - ? 64 by PNY (128 MB, the only card with memory running at 500 MHz, 2 x DVI instead of DVI + VGA) - ? 67 by PNY (256 MB, but running at only 400 MHz, 2 x DVI instead of DVI + VGA) Other brands are hard to find here in Italy (from sellers I trust). EVGA offers a 6200LE card, which has two pixel pipelines instead of four so I don't consider it. Since I don't trust Sparkle, I've to choose between XFX and PNY. Are they reliable? Which one is better? PNY supports AGP 2.0 as stated on their site, XFX doesn't say anything about it: is it obvious? Or should I worry the XFX card won't work on AGP 4x (2.0)? If it's worth, I could spend some extra money, I could get an ATI X1300 PRO AGP (256 MB) for - 89 ? by Sapphire It has 128 bit memory bus, faster memory, same number of shaders (but probably more efficient) and maybe better video support. The package also includes PowerDVD. Since the problem with the NVidia card, I'm attracted by the idea of trying an ATI one (I had an old ATI 3D Rage Pro which worked great buck in the '90). I can afford the money but... Well... The 40 / 20 ? different is noticeable and I want to know if it would be worth it. I wasn't unable to find this GPU on AGP boards by other brands... I think any of these cards (XFX, PNY, Sapphore) would work great for the Windows Vista Aero stuff, when it comes out. What do you suggest? Quality and brand reliability (please don't compare quality of this card with the 150 ? ones ) is what matter most. Moreover, do you think Guild Wars will take advantage of the two CPUs? If not maybe the processor would be the bottleneck... Thanks in advance, Andrea |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Best fitting video card: NVIDIA (which brand?) or ATI (Sapphire)?
Sorry, ? == euro. I guess I've the wrong codepage. Just another question.
What about power consumption? Is the 375 W PSU enough? Thanks to anyone who wants to help. "Andrea Sansottera" wrote in message ... Hi all, I have the following system: 2 x Pentium III 866 MHz 1 GB of RDRAM PC600 with ECC 1 x 18.2 GB SCSI hard drive spinning at 10,000 rpm 4X (AGP 2.0) slot 375W PSU I'd like to play Guild Wars, watching videos and doing photo editing. Right now, I have a 3DLabs Oxygen GVX1 video card (nearly $ 1000 dollars back in 1999 or 2000). It's an high quality card and offers an excellent video quality and color fidelity. Anyway, it's an old card and not compliant even with DirectX 8.0. On the other hand I've a GeForce MX 440 with 64 MB of RAM, Sparkle branded. It's noticeably better for games, but has a terrible output quality. For example: even the Windows XP colors looks a bit odd compared to the output I get with other computer (or the 3DLabs card) and font seems out of focus (I don't have antialiasing enabled). I don't know if it's by design or if the card is degradated. Due to the problems with card by Sparkle and the age of the one by 3DLabs, I've good reasons to buy a faster video card. Since the processing power of the two CPU isn't that impressive (and neither the amount of money in my pocket, for that matter) I'm watching to low budget card for the AGP market segment. GeForce 6200A (NV44A) has native support for AGP wich reduces cost (no need for AGP-PCIE signals converter) and the memory bus stripped down to 64 bit. The amount of memory is 128 MB or 256 MB, usually running at a clock speed of 400 MHz. I could get a card with this GPU for: - ? 42 by XFX (128 MB, 400 MHz) - ? 52 by XFX (256 MB, 400 MHz) - ? 57 by Sparkle (256 MB, 400 MHz... but since the card by Sparkle I have gives me that problem I simply don't trust the brand) - ? 64 by PNY (128 MB, the only card with memory running at 500 MHz, 2 x DVI instead of DVI + VGA) - ? 67 by PNY (256 MB, but running at only 400 MHz, 2 x DVI instead of DVI + VGA) Other brands are hard to find here in Italy (from sellers I trust). EVGA offers a 6200LE card, which has two pixel pipelines instead of four so I don't consider it. Since I don't trust Sparkle, I've to choose between XFX and PNY. Are they reliable? Which one is better? PNY supports AGP 2.0 as stated on their site, XFX doesn't say anything about it: is it obvious? Or should I worry the XFX card won't work on AGP 4x (2.0)? If it's worth, I could spend some extra money, I could get an ATI X1300 PRO AGP (256 MB) for - 89 ? by Sapphire It has 128 bit memory bus, faster memory, same number of shaders (but probably more efficient) and maybe better video support. The package also includes PowerDVD. Since the problem with the NVidia card, I'm attracted by the idea of trying an ATI one (I had an old ATI 3D Rage Pro which worked great buck in the '90). I can afford the money but... Well... The 40 / 20 ? different is noticeable and I want to know if it would be worth it. I wasn't unable to find this GPU on AGP boards by other brands... I think any of these cards (XFX, PNY, Sapphore) would work great for the Windows Vista Aero stuff, when it comes out. What do you suggest? Quality and brand reliability (please don't compare quality of this card with the 150 ? ones ) is what matter most. Moreover, do you think Guild Wars will take advantage of the two CPUs? If not maybe the processor would be the bottleneck... Thanks in advance, Andrea |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seagate Barracuda 160 GB IDE becomes corrupted. RMA? | Dan_Musicant | Storage (alternative) | 79 | February 28th 06 08:23 AM |
Best Card for Handling Video Playback & Driving Large Display | Harkhof | General | 31 | February 5th 06 12:14 AM |
What video card should I buy | [email protected] | Nvidia Videocards | 8 | July 23rd 05 06:55 PM |
New Video Card AGP | B&B Musmon | AMD Thunderbird Processors | 1 | August 29th 04 02:25 PM |
Question Evga 6800GT and Official drivers | Jean | Nvidia Videocards | 5 | July 8th 04 04:34 AM |