A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » Overclocking AMD Processors
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

July 6th 2004 the MBM development comes to a stop.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 7th 04, 08:16 AM
johny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default July 6th 2004 the MBM development comes to a stop.

January 21st 1998 the Internet saw the 1st version of MBM v. 1.0
Juli 6th 2004, about 7.5 years later the MBM development comes to a stop.

Yes you read it right, after thinking about it for several weeks I have
decided to stop development on MBM. Over the years many (if not all) clones
appeared that tried to do what MBM did. Some succeeded others did not. Some
I feel where technically and user wise better then MBM but with an average
of 6000 hits a day and coverage on almost every PC magazine in the world it
still seems to be the most popular monitoring tool around. And it is better
to stop at your peak
So why cancel MBM ? There are several reasons for this:

The industrie itself, it is getting harder and harder to get any good info
from companies, Abit and the Uguru was a good example but you can alsmost
put any other name in the list, getting info from ATI, VIA, SiS, Asus is as
good as impossible, and so I depend more and more on MBM users to help me
with info and it is just plain frustrating to keep sending mails to
companies asking for info and getting no or a BS reply back.
Time, I spend about an hour a day answering mail and answering the forum,
the FAQ does not stop many users from still mailing me with the same old
questions. This is not just the users fault, the design of MBM could have
been better but when I started it everything was pretty simple and the core
of MBM is simply old, making changes to it requires a lot of work and
changes.

Keeping up with the sensor world, many GFX cards come out with sensor chip,
I tried the plugin method in the hope that users would pick that up, a few
did but overal it was not a big success, so to keep MBM up to date I would
need to do the GFX stuff myself, wich means I need GFX cards. The donation I
get for MBM does not make up for that I am afriad

Motivation, 7.5 years is a long time......
http://www.3degs.net/index.php?page=...ws&article=169

Now johny...
What i have learned from this article is that there is hardware monitoring s
oftware out there that can get GFX temps, I'd like to get me one of those.
Can you think of one that can get me my ATI Radeon 9800 PRO temps through
MSI K8T800?


  #2  
Old July 7th 04, 07:19 PM
Ed Light
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for a great program.

Do you have links to possible replacements by any chance? That would help us
MBM-dependents immensely.

--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at

Thanks, robots.

"johny" wrote in message
news:drNGc.36293$a24.1971@attbi_s03...
January 21st 1998 the Internet saw the 1st version of MBM v. 1.0
Juli 6th 2004, about 7.5 years later the MBM development comes to a stop.

Yes you read it right, after thinking about it for several weeks I have
decided to stop development on MBM. Over the years many (if not all)

clones
appeared that tried to do what MBM did. Some succeeded others did not.

Some
I feel where technically and user wise better then MBM but with an average
of 6000 hits a day and coverage on almost every PC magazine in the world

it
still seems to be the most popular monitoring tool around. And it is

better
to stop at your peak
So why cancel MBM ? There are several reasons for this:

The industrie itself, it is getting harder and harder to get any good info
from companies, Abit and the Uguru was a good example but you can alsmost
put any other name in the list, getting info from ATI, VIA, SiS, Asus is

as
good as impossible, and so I depend more and more on MBM users to help me
with info and it is just plain frustrating to keep sending mails to
companies asking for info and getting no or a BS reply back.
Time, I spend about an hour a day answering mail and answering the forum,
the FAQ does not stop many users from still mailing me with the same old
questions. This is not just the users fault, the design of MBM could have
been better but when I started it everything was pretty simple and the

core
of MBM is simply old, making changes to it requires a lot of work and
changes.

Keeping up with the sensor world, many GFX cards come out with sensor

chip,
I tried the plugin method in the hope that users would pick that up, a few
did but overal it was not a big success, so to keep MBM up to date I would
need to do the GFX stuff myself, wich means I need GFX cards. The donation

I
get for MBM does not make up for that I am afriad

Motivation, 7.5 years is a long time......
http://www.3degs.net/index.php?page=...ws&article=169

Now johny...
What i have learned from this article is that there is hardware monitoring

s
oftware out there that can get GFX temps, I'd like to get me one of those.
Can you think of one that can get me my ATI Radeon 9800 PRO temps through
MSI K8T800?




  #3  
Old July 8th 04, 03:39 AM
Hank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Light" wrote in message
news:q8XGc.21386$Qj6.1970@fed1read05...
Thanks for a great program.

Do you have links to possible replacements by any chance? That would help
us
MBM-dependents immensely.

--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at

Thanks, robots.

"johny" wrote in message
news:drNGc.36293$a24.1971@attbi_s03...
January 21st 1998 the Internet saw the 1st version of MBM v. 1.0
Juli 6th 2004, about 7.5 years later the MBM development comes to a stop.

Yes you read it right, after thinking about it for several weeks I have
decided to stop development on MBM. Over the years many (if not all)

clones
appeared that tried to do what MBM did. Some succeeded others did not.

Some
I feel where technically and user wise better then MBM but with an
average
of 6000 hits a day and coverage on almost every PC magazine in the world

it
still seems to be the most popular monitoring tool around. And it is

better
to stop at your peak
So why cancel MBM ? There are several reasons for this:

The industrie itself, it is getting harder and harder to get any good
info
from companies, Abit and the Uguru was a good example but you can alsmost
put any other name in the list, getting info from ATI, VIA, SiS, Asus is

as
good as impossible, and so I depend more and more on MBM users to help me
with info and it is just plain frustrating to keep sending mails to
companies asking for info and getting no or a BS reply back.
Time, I spend about an hour a day answering mail and answering the forum,
the FAQ does not stop many users from still mailing me with the same old
questions. This is not just the users fault, the design of MBM could have
been better but when I started it everything was pretty simple and the

core
of MBM is simply old, making changes to it requires a lot of work and
changes.

Keeping up with the sensor world, many GFX cards come out with sensor

chip,
I tried the plugin method in the hope that users would pick that up, a
few
did but overal it was not a big success, so to keep MBM up to date I
would
need to do the GFX stuff myself, wich means I need GFX cards. The
donation

I
get for MBM does not make up for that I am afriad

Motivation, 7.5 years is a long time......
http://www.3degs.net/index.php?page=...ws&article=169

Now johny...
What i have learned from this article is that there is hardware
monitoring

s
oftware out there that can get GFX temps, I'd like to get me one of
those.
Can you think of one that can get me my ATI Radeon 9800 PRO temps through
MSI K8T800?


Speed Fan http://www.almico.com/speedfan.php

Hank


  #4  
Old July 8th 04, 02:50 PM
robin0800
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ed Light" wrote in
news:q8XGc.21386$Qj6.1970@fed1read05:

Thanks for a great program.

Do you have links to possible replacements by any chance? That would
help us MBM-dependents immensely.


test
  #5  
Old July 8th 04, 02:51 PM
robin0800
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ed Light" wrote in
news:q8XGc.21386$Qj6.1970@fed1read05:

Thanks for a great program.

Do you have links to possible replacements by any chance? That would
help us MBM-dependents immensely.


Google for speed fan v1.3 is latest

Robin
  #6  
Old July 8th 04, 03:06 PM
Tyrone Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, I appreciate your efforts and time in developing and maintaining a
quality product such as yours.

I have always enjoyed using your products.

Good luck on your further adventures.

Ty

"johny" wrote in message
news:drNGc.36293$a24.1971@attbi_s03...
January 21st 1998 the Internet saw the 1st version of MBM v. 1.0
Juli 6th 2004, about 7.5 years later the MBM development comes to a stop.

Yes you read it right, after thinking about it for several weeks I have
decided to stop development on MBM. Over the years many (if not all)

clones
appeared that tried to do what MBM did. Some succeeded others did not.

Some
I feel where technically and user wise better then MBM but with an average
of 6000 hits a day and coverage on almost every PC magazine in the world

it
still seems to be the most popular monitoring tool around. And it is

better
to stop at your peak
So why cancel MBM ? There are several reasons for this:

The industrie itself, it is getting harder and harder to get any good info
from companies, Abit and the Uguru was a good example but you can alsmost
put any other name in the list, getting info from ATI, VIA, SiS, Asus is

as
good as impossible, and so I depend more and more on MBM users to help me
with info and it is just plain frustrating to keep sending mails to
companies asking for info and getting no or a BS reply back.
Time, I spend about an hour a day answering mail and answering the forum,
the FAQ does not stop many users from still mailing me with the same old
questions. This is not just the users fault, the design of MBM could have
been better but when I started it everything was pretty simple and the

core
of MBM is simply old, making changes to it requires a lot of work and
changes.

Keeping up with the sensor world, many GFX cards come out with sensor

chip,
I tried the plugin method in the hope that users would pick that up, a few
did but overal it was not a big success, so to keep MBM up to date I would
need to do the GFX stuff myself, wich means I need GFX cards. The donation

I
get for MBM does not make up for that I am afriad

Motivation, 7.5 years is a long time......
http://www.3degs.net/index.php?page=...ws&article=169

Now johny...
What i have learned from this article is that there is hardware monitoring

s
oftware out there that can get GFX temps, I'd like to get me one of those.
Can you think of one that can get me my ATI Radeon 9800 PRO temps through
MSI K8T800?




  #7  
Old July 9th 04, 11:55 PM
dublevay
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"johny" wrote in message
news:drNGc.36293$a24.1971@attbi_s03...
January 21st 1998 the Internet saw the 1st version of MBM v. 1.0
Juli 6th 2004, about 7.5 years later the MBM development comes to a stop.


I make that 6.5 years!

JW


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modem connection speed Neil Barnwell General 58 July 14th 04 07:18 PM
Happy Birthday America SST Overclocking 333 November 27th 03 07:54 PM
Happy Birthday America SST Overclocking AMD Processors 326 November 27th 03 07:54 PM
Stop 0x000000B8 Error John © Homebuilt PC's 1 September 23rd 03 12:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.