If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pressler D950 vs Conroe E6600
Just briefly, besides the 1066 vs 800 FSB and the 4MB vs 2MB L2 cache, why
would I go with the Conroe rather than the Pressler? Or are those two factors worth the extra $140? The D950 is 3.2GHz and the E6600 is 2.4. I'm not a multitasker per se, but I do occasional video/photo editing. I will not be OC-ing this to the hilt and I'm not planning on using a water cooled setup. Thoughts? Ron |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pressler D950 vs Conroe E6600
$150 extra dollor is well worth the performance you are going to get from
it.. In almost 90% benchmarks E6600 beaten or equaled AMD fx 62 or P4 EE, its not just 4mb cash its shared cache meaning if core 1 is finished processing threads from its current cache it will look in core 2 cache to process any threads before looking into system RAM thus reducing lot of processing time as seen in many benchmarks. You don't need water cooling with it either stock cooling is just fine for the task you are gonna do plus additional taks you can do such as video editing and doing something else at the same time. Just take a look at why core 2 duo is better on www.google.com My 2 cents spend extra $140 and you won't be disappointed. Also speed in Mhz doesn't always gives better performance as it used to be in previous P4 models. Cheers "Ron Krebs" wrote in message news:_s3Mg.4748$I71.4620@trnddc01... Just briefly, besides the 1066 vs 800 FSB and the 4MB vs 2MB L2 cache, why would I go with the Conroe rather than the Pressler? Or are those two factors worth the extra $140? The D950 is 3.2GHz and the E6600 is 2.4. I'm not a multitasker per se, but I do occasional video/photo editing. I will not be OC-ing this to the hilt and I'm not planning on using a water cooled setup. Thoughts? Ron |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pressler D950 vs Conroe E6600
"Ron Krebs" wrote in message news:_s3Mg.4748$I71.4620@trnddc01... Just briefly, besides the 1066 vs 800 FSB and the 4MB vs 2MB L2 cache, why would I go with the Conroe rather than the Pressler? Or are those two factors worth the extra $140? The D950 is 3.2GHz and the E6600 is 2.4. I'm not a multitasker per se, but I do occasional video/photo editing. I will not be OC-ing this to the hilt and I'm not planning on using a water cooled setup. Thoughts? Ron The E6600 is faster,cooler running,and more energy efficent.GHz really isn't a factor with dual cores they way it used to be with older models. The 6600 will equal or outperform AMD's top of the line FX62. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pressler D950 vs Conroe E6600
"Gojira" wrote in message newsu9Mg.6704$I71.3936@trnddc01... "Ron Krebs" wrote in message news:_s3Mg.4748$I71.4620@trnddc01... Just briefly, besides the 1066 vs 800 FSB and the 4MB vs 2MB L2 cache, why would I go with the Conroe rather than the Pressler? Or are those two factors worth the extra $140? The D950 is 3.2GHz and the E6600 is 2.4. I'm not a multitasker per se, but I do occasional video/photo editing. I will not be OC-ing this to the hilt and I'm not planning on using a water cooled setup. Thoughts? Ron The E6600 is faster,cooler running,and more energy efficent.GHz really isn't a factor with dual cores they way it used to be with older models. The 6600 will equal or outperform AMD's top of the line FX62. Ok, one more quick question which may be a bit OT. The system RAM. Is the speed of the RAM a function of the motherboard, CPU, or both? The board I'm getting has 1066MHz FSB and I know the E6600 can operate at that speed. But the board mfg says that it can handle PC6400 DDR2 RAM which would be 667 RAM. Now if the board only goes 1066 wouldn't that mean that you'd only get 533 RAM to fill the slots since 533X2 is 1066? I mean wouldn't you need a mobo that is capable of 1333MHz FSB to realize the full potential of DDR2 667? Thanks again. Ron |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pressler D950 vs Conroe E6600
The D950 runs MUCH hotter natively and has a far more inefficient internal
pathway than the Conroe's. GHz for GHz the Conroe's will outperform the Pressler's by a wide margin. -- DaveW ---------------- "Ron Krebs" wrote in message news:_s3Mg.4748$I71.4620@trnddc01... Just briefly, besides the 1066 vs 800 FSB and the 4MB vs 2MB L2 cache, why would I go with the Conroe rather than the Pressler? Or are those two factors worth the extra $140? The D950 is 3.2GHz and the E6600 is 2.4. I'm not a multitasker per se, but I do occasional video/photo editing. I will not be OC-ing this to the hilt and I'm not planning on using a water cooled setup. Thoughts? Ron |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Pressler D950 vs Conroe E6600
Ron Krebs wrote:
Just briefly, besides the 1066 vs 800 FSB and the 4MB vs 2MB L2 cache, why would I go with the Conroe rather than the Pressler? Or are those two factors worth the extra $140? The D950 is 3.2GHz and the E6600 is 2.4. I'm not a multitasker per se, but I do occasional video/photo editing. I will not be OC-ing this to the hilt and I'm not planning on using a water cooled setup. Thoughts? I just went 6600, lower power, faster (results, not clock speed), new tech vs. tech at end-of-life. Unless the cost is a deal breaker, I would go 6600. Best reason yet, Intel says the quad core will drop in to replace the 6600/6700. Modulo a BIOS upgrade I think it's likely. Big cache will really help photo work, less memory bus contention. Some boards let you o/c the memory independently of the CPU. I just got some DDR675 (PC5400) RAM, and I plan to try that after the system burns in. Just came UPS this afternoon, details Monday. My business reason for this system was building Linux kernels, but some video work is probably in the future. -- Bill Davidsen "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
X2 vs Conroe etc etc | bards1888 | AMD x86-64 Processors | 14 | July 12th 06 06:03 PM |
conroe challenge | themillman | Overclocking AMD Processors | 16 | June 27th 06 03:01 PM |
Help! Conroe or Kentsfield? | Chalky | Overclocking | 3 | June 16th 06 01:35 AM |
AnandTech Benchmark | [email protected] | AMD x86-64 Processors | 0 | June 7th 06 07:56 PM |
What Asus board for Conroe? | ridergroov | Asus Motherboards | 6 | June 2nd 06 06:01 PM |