If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dell The AC power adapter type cannot be determined and shield cablefor id chip??
I recently got a free dell d600 laptop. The laptop is fine but it has
the notorious "The AC power adapter type cannot be determined" problem. I borrow a new ac adapter and the problem is solved. I found out from a website that the dell ac adapter has some design flaws. http://www.laptop-junction.com/toast...r-id-chip-died I don't want to keep buying AC adpter because of a bad id chips. Is there any way to modify it other than using shield cable or moving the power supply id chip to laptop? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dell The AC power adapter type cannot be determined and shieldcable for id chip??
wrote:
I recently got a free dell d600 laptop. The laptop is fine but it has the notorious "The AC power adapter type cannot be determined" problem. I borrow a new ac adapter and the problem is solved. I found out from a website that the dell ac adapter has some design flaws. http://www.laptop-junction.com/toast...r-id-chip-died I don't want to keep buying AC adpter because of a bad id chips. Is there any way to modify it other than using shield cable or moving the power supply id chip to laptop? So what is the design flaw ? The one wire network is intended to support networks with a lot of wire in them. With slew rate control, it is possible to make decent looking waveforms, without upsetting the FCC. The devices also have a high ESD rating. The communication rate is 16Kbit/sec or so, sort of like the rates you might see on an RS-232 cable. In the laptop adapter case, the network is relatively small, compared to the device capabilities. http://pdfserv.maxim-ic.com/en/an/AN148.pdf The reliability report for the DS2501, shows some failures in high voltage testing. The "HBM" entries would stand for "human body model", which is a particular combination of RC network, charged to the indicated voltage. So it is meeting "8KV HBM". (An Intel USB port is 6KV rated, for comparison.) I don't know what the "IEC 61000-4-2 CONTACT" test above it is all about, so cannot comment on whether failures of that test can be ignored as the report seems to be doing. It is almost as if they expect the device to fail that particular test. http://www.maxim-ic.com/reliability/dallas/DS2501.pdf I couldn't get a datasheet for the DS2501 from Maxim, so had to get one from datasheetarchive. It is a DS2502, but bulk programmed. The bus voltage, according to this datasheet, is 2.8V to as high as 6.0V. So if the laptop-junction guy is seeing 16 volts delivered, that is the amount of voltage used for programming. What the effect would be on the device, I haven't a clue (because programming is probably another hard to find datasheet). If I was the laptop-junction guy, I'd be comparing voltage level on the 1-wire, to the range allowed by the datasheet. I'd feel happier if I could get this sheet from Maxim. http://www.datasheetarchive.com/sear...501&sType=part The 1-wire family may exist with different bus voltages. Or it could be, that the higher bus voltage is intended for larger networks or something. In any case, I'd want to be absolutely sure first, whether the application (Dell laptop), is treating that poor chip properly. If the laptop has a problem, and is abusing the ID chip, then it might kill them one after another. As for "moving it inside", that sounds like a good idea. Would the chip be drawing power from the battery at all times ? You'd almost need a schematic for the laptop, to get some idea of how they're probing the thing, and what power source is supposed to be used. Or what power source could be used in a retrofit. Any amount of external protection could be added to the 1-wire. Like external ESD snubbing networks, a zener to limit bus voltage, or whatever. It might not be just an unarmored bus. Lots of fiddly little details... As for the comment about "2 meter long UNSHIELDED wire", unshielded wire is fine, with attention to details. The bus is unterminated, but has slew rate limiting. So you would not expect active signal radiation. It would be possible for conducted emissions to travel down the wire, but you could remove those with a ferrite bead, or a filter cap etc. The filter cap could even be part of the slew rate control network. For the 1-wire to work, it needs a ground reference, and the ground wire traveling in the cable next to the "antenna", reduces the loop size. We don't know if the wires are twisted inside the cable or not. Again, lots of little details. So right now, I have only one question. "What is 16.5V doing traveling to a 2.8 to 6V chip?" HTH, Paul |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dell The AC power adapter type cannot be determined and shieldcable for id chip??
I found the schematics.
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/2240/psidl77.jpg http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/4444/iotopsidl.jpg The DS2501 data pin is connected to power jack center pin and then - L77-I/O PS_ID and D108 pin3. The AC adapter jack center pin has no voltage when not connected to laptop. When connected, center pin has 3.23V. According to a laptop repair website, some D600 motherboard has burnt L77 and D108. In this case, I/O must be replaced. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dell The AC power adapter type cannot be determined and shieldcable for id chip??
wrote:
I found the schematics. http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/2240/psidl77.jpg http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/4444/iotopsidl.jpg The DS2501 data pin is connected to power jack center pin and then - L77-I/O PS_ID and D108 pin3. The AC adapter jack center pin has no voltage when not connected to laptop. When connected, center pin has 3.23V. According to a laptop repair website, some D600 motherboard has burnt L77 and D108. In this case, I/O must be replaced. L77 BLM11B102S is a ferrite inductor (possibly murata.com). It appears as a resistance at high frequencies, and is used to attenuate high frequency noise. It consists of a "piece of wire wound one or more times, through a piece of ferrite". When used in a data circuit, they can distort the data signal, but in this case, 16KHz will likely be quite transparent to its effects. It is intended to prevent RFI from escaping the laptop, by traveling down the adapter cable. (So electrical noise from the laptop, won't spoil broadcast TV reception.) D108 is a dual diode configured in "signal clamp" mode. Dual diodes are available in various configurations, and this head to tail style of dual diode, allows the two ends to be connected to "rails". In this case, one rail is +3VALW and the other is ground. If the signal on PS_ID goes more positive, by 0.7V, then +3VALW, then a large current can flow through pin 1 of the dual diode, burning it. If PS_ID were to go more than -0.7V (below ground voltage), the lower diode would conduct. My guess is, the upper half of the dual diode, is what is getting burned. The intention of D108, is to protect LPC47N254 from damage. Sometimes a signal will have a little overshoot or undershoot, and rather than have a protection diode inside LPC47N254 go into conduction, they use a beefier three legged D108 type device outside, to take the strain. The overshoot and undershoot time period and current magnitude, are normally handled by devices like D108, without it even getting warm. So if all D108 is doing, is handling logic signals, normally there would not be a problem. But D108 is not designed, to stop say, a power rail from the adapter (16.5V leaking from the main power lead). If the 16.5V main DC from the adapter makes contact with D108, without a current limiting resistor in place, then D108 will be a "smoking hole in the ground". The level of current may even be high enough, to melt the tiny wire (depending on how it is formed) inside L77. L77 will have a low resistance to DC flow, but perhaps not when a power supply is placed right across it :-( I would guess that pin 2 is somehow coming in contact with pin 1 on the power connector. I would examine the connector style, to see if it has a mechanism to prevent rotation and incidental contact. Or, look to see if the pins stick out far enough, to allow the wrong contacts to touch. As well, notice the interface actually consists of four signals. Safety_Ground (connector metal shell?), DCIN-, DCIN+, PSID. The laptop eventually connects DCIN- to ground. That means DCIN- is zero volts with respect to metal on the chassis. And DCIN+ would be +16.5V or whatever, when the adapter is providing power to the laptop. If I was picking the connector, I would make sure that PSID had the shortest pin in the connector, such that PSID made contact the last, when the connectors mate. I would try to ensure that ground was properly established, before PSID could get in trouble. It is possible there are other fault modes - for example, you could still damage LPC47N254, but without leaving burn marks on L77 or D108. If the engineer in charge of this project hadn't included PSID in the design, the design would be closer to being bulletproof. Adding a data signal puts the design in a whole different space (more engineers should be called in for consultation). We had some issues like this at work. A lot of our products were designed for hot insertion (safely adding an electronics module to a running machine), and at least one module had the pins making contact in the wrong order. This caused a quite negative voltage to appear on a logic signal, blowing the chip all to hell. So when there are power signals and data signals on a connector, you need to involve a mechanical engineer, to do an analysis as to how many different ways a customer can jam the product in the hole the wrong way, and so on. A good design, guides the connector mating, such that only the correct pins can mate, and mate in an order that will not allow abnormal voltages to appear on any logic signals. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dell XPS laptops give shock because of lack of ground in power adapter | Jay B | Dell Computers | 1 | January 18th 08 04:54 PM |
what adapter type? use for what? | Nick[_4_] | General | 4 | September 7th 07 01:37 AM |
Dell Inspiron 2200 Battery / Power Adapter | CowboysFan | Dell Computers | 1 | July 6th 06 03:48 PM |
Memory chip type question. | Brian The Snail | General | 0 | January 6th 05 10:14 PM |
Dell M781mm monitor power adapter info needed | James Nykiel & Linda Voci | Dell Computers | 0 | November 5th 03 04:42 PM |