If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
5200 vs 6600d
jonsnow3000 wrote: I bought the 6600d today for 200 dollars at compusa. The 5200 model was on sell for 140 and the hp 8250 was 80 dollars. I am very happy with my choice UNLESS YOU ARE GOING TO MOSTLY PRINT WITHOUT USING A COMPUTER THE IP5200 WOULD HAVE BEEN A BETTER CHOICE. after going to my local rite aid last month and almost buying another 38 dollar tri-color ink cartridge for my hp 712c. The prints are sharp and I can see detail like you wouldn't believe. The color is spot on. This will very, very work well for what I do. The red lights on the inks look like something out of Star Trek, a very cool effect. The inks are about 14 dollars each but hold twice the ml of the 8250 which cost 9.99 each and in various ml sizes. If hp had any sense they would have put at least 14 ml in each ink cartridge, I would have no problem buying the hp for that alone. I heard the 8250 costs a small fortune in ink costs and run out every 100 pages. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
8 x 10 prints and ink cost
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 22:11:20 +0200, "pecan"
wrote: I use HP ink and HP paper, but can't see if it's swellable polymer.... how would I know? Catherine I believe all of the HP photo papers are swellable polymer. I know that the Premium and Premium Plus ones definitely are. --- http://www.FenrirOnline.com Computer services, custom metal etching, arts, crafts, and much more. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
5200 vs 6600d
"measekite" wrote in message news jonsnow3000 wrote: I bought the 6600d today for 200 dollars at compusa. The 5200 model was on sell for 140 and the hp 8250 was 80 dollars. I am very happy with my choice UNLESS YOU ARE GOING TO MOSTLY PRINT WITHOUT USING A COMPUTER THE IP5200 WOULD HAVE BEEN A BETTER CHOICE. Some of us are willing to pay the extra $50 to get versatility. Your money, you make your choice, My money, I made mine, as did jonsnow. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
5200 vs 6600d
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message news:MtO0g.1510$0Z3.336@trndny07... I bought the 6600d today for 200 dollars at compusa. The 5200 model was on sell for 140 and the hp 8250 was 80 dollars. I am very happy with my choice Some of us are willing to pay the extra $50 to get versatility. Your money, you make your choice, My money, I made mine, as did jonsnow. The troll owns an ip4000 and is so in love with it that he/she doesn't acknowledge the benefit of six color printers for photo printing. Typical response on MK's part is to criticize someone's purchase after the fact based on his meager experience of owning this one inkjet printer. I have two i960 printers and really like the photo print quality. The positive on the six color Canon printer is more subtle shading due to the reduced dye-load inks. The downside is that it literally drinks the reduced dye-load inks. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
5200 vs 6600d
Edwin Pawlowski wrote: "measekite" wrote in message news jonsnow3000 wrote: I bought the 6600d today for 200 dollars at compusa. The 5200 model was on sell for 140 and the hp 8250 was 80 dollars. I am very happy with my choice UNLESS YOU ARE GOING TO MOSTLY PRINT WITHOUT USING A COMPUTER THE IP5200 WOULD HAVE BEEN A BETTER CHOICE. Some of us are willing to pay the extra $50 to get versatility. Your money, you make your choice, My money, I made mine, as did jonsnow. THERE REALLY IS NO VERSATILITY UNLESS YOU WANT TO PRINT WITHOUT USING A COMPUTER. IFNOT YOU DO NOT NEED THE TINY LCD. THE EXTRA MONEY WILL BUY YOU AN ADDITIONALO SET OF CARTS. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
5200 vs 6600d
Burt wrote: "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message news:MtO0g.1510$0Z3.336@trndny07... I bought the 6600d today for 200 dollars at compusa. The 5200 model was on sell for 140 and the hp 8250 was 80 dollars. I am very happy with my choice Some of us are willing to pay the extra $50 to get versatility. Your money, you make your choice, My money, I made mine, as did jonsnow. The troll owns an ip4000 and is so in love with it that he/she doesn't acknowledge the benefit of six color printers for photo printing. Typical response on MK's part is to criticize someone's purchase after the fact based on his meager experience of owning this one inkjet printer. I have two i960 printers and really like the photo print quality. The positive on the six color Canon printer is more subtle shading due to the reduced dye-load inks. The downside is that it literally drinks the reduced dye-load inks. Yes, the spiffy screen is beside the point. In the past there were D models offered for the photo printers, and screenless ones. Now there is no choice.. at least in North America. Japan is another story, you have your choice between the 6600D for ï¿¥27,900 ($236.00) or the ip7500 for ï¿¥23,800.(US$202.08) I.e. the screenless model with the extra black sells for less and offers an option for users who otherwise would pick the ip4200/5200 for a general purpose printer. But I would agree it's the user's choice. A printer is a tool... and every tool user has their own preference. I would not criticize this person's choice as their power application is printing photos. The pigment black offers no real benifit... except for oddballs like me who want stark lines matte on cartoony work. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|