If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 07:18:39 GMT
"oodler" wrote: "J.Clarke" wrote in message ... All that seems to say is that AGP 2X boards won't physically fit into AGP 4x-only motherboards. That should not be an issue with the products you mention. I'm not really clear on what you mean by "bevel"--to me a bevel is simply a relieved edge. Forget about the 'bevel' issue- it's really not important. I've gotten advice on this issue ranging from things like "[your] motherboard only supports 3.3V I/O, and it seems that the card you bought only supports 1.5V I/O, which explains why the slot pattern prevents you inserting it," to assholes who just want to poke fun at me for making a purchasing mistake and have no intention of truly helping me with my problem. I'm looking for something in between- advice simple and direct, but not baby-talk. All I'm looking for is the proper type of Nvidia GF2 MX-400 AGP to fit in the AGP slot of my Dell XPS-T600. Really, that's all. Really. Am I missing something here in thinking it's not fundamentally more complicated than that? The trouble is that nobody can help you until we really understand what the problem is. I've worked with a number of machines with SE440BX and BX2 boards and they've taken just about any video board I tried to stick in them--they have a standard 3.3v AGP2 slot--but I've not seen a BX3 and it's quite possible that Dell had Intel do something peculiar to it. There should be nothing unusual about an GF2MX400 that prevents it from fitting that slot if it is the same as on the BX and BX2 boards, but it's possible that the GF2MX400 that you got had some unusual design feature that prevents it from fitting the slot. So either you've got a weird motherboard or you got a weird video board, and until we know which it is and the details of the weirdness we can't advise you in any meaningful way. If I had your video board and your motherboard sitting in front of me I could tell at a glance what the problem is, but I don't have them sitting in front of me and I'm not clairvoyant so I don't have an answer for you. You have to draw that picture for me first. However, I'll try to explain the issues to you. There are two basic types of AGP slot, "AGP" and "AGP Pro". An AGP Pro slot is longer than an AGP slot, with an extension at each end. You can use a standard AGP board in an AGP pro slot, but you can't use an AGP Pro board in a regular AGP slot. In order to make sure that they are properly aligned when they are put in AGP Pro slots, AGP boards made after a certain date have an extra tab, called the "registration tab", that aligns the board properly in an AGP Pro slot and does not go into the connector on a regular AGP slot. It is unlikely in the extreme that an SE440BX3 board has an AGP pro slot. It is conceivable, but also highly unlikely, that a GF2MX440 has an AGP Pro connector. More likely it has a regular AGP connector with a registration tab. There are pictures of this at http://www.supermicro.com/TECHSUPPORT/FAQs/AGP_Pro.htm. Now, in addition to this, AGP boards are made to work with 3.3 volts or 1.5 volts or dual-standard to work with either. There is a key in the AGP connector that prevents a board of the wrong voltage from being fitted into the slot. With a 3.3 volt machine the connector is toward the back where the card mounting brackets are, while with a 1.5 volt machine it is at the opposite end. A 3.3 volt board will have a cutout that fits over the 3.3 volt key but not the 1.5 volt key. A 1.5 volt board will be the other way, while one that works with either will have both cutouts. So, if you can tell us if either of those was the case, or if the board did not fit for some other reason, then maybe someone can advise you. -- -- --John Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"oodler" wrote in message
... You're not helping me by telling me this is my fault. I didn't come to be ridiculed for making a mistake; I came here to learn how to rectify it. Well I can't speak for him, but I think your anger at the place you ordered it from is misplaced; I think it was rather decent of them to recredit your account, some places wouldn't. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The LX chipset was AGP 2X as well. There was never an Intel chipset released
that supported only 1X to my knowledge. (Or any chipset, actually, though there were some like the AMD 760 "Irongate" where anything over 1X didn't work properly due to design flaws..) -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ "Dave" wrote in message news:%nAXa.65564$uu5.6677@sccrnsc04... "oodler" wrote in message ... "Robert Hancock" wrote in message . ca... snip Isn't the Intel SE440BX-3 AA722396-108 motherboard AGP 1x? No, it's most certainly 2x. It's AGP 1.0 revision, but it's definitely 2x. The LX chipset was 1x, the BX was a different story. Even the ATI Rage Pro siamesed to some BX mobos in lieu of an AGP slot (like in the Dell XPS V series) still ran at 2x (FWTW). Here is the list of AGP specs he http://www.motherboards.org/articles...ons/920_2.html . This means it's keyed for 1x/2x 3.3v cards only (which is why your older card fit in there). Now if the edge connector on the MX card had ONE keyway (the "bevel" thingummy) on the OTHER SIDE of the connector from where it was on the 3dfx card that came out of there, then it would not have fit, and I'm afraid to say you got the wrong card. I have NEVER EVER seen ANY MX2 card that could not work in a 3.3v slot, but that doesn't mean one or two don't exist. If the card you got has TWO keyways, as is in the picture on TCWO's site, this means it's universal and it will fit. Just out of curiosity your board has Yamaha XG onboard sound, right? So if it's the mobo I'm thinking of then it does indeed have an AGP slot, and just about ANY MX2 will fit, and a whole bunch of faster cards too... Sorry I made fun of you, but it was just TOO EASY! I guess it's too easy to forget my own past n00bishness too...but calling me an asshole is like pouring gasoline on the fire...so you want "Asshole", do ya? I would think that would be the point of this whole ordeal given that the supposedly "backwards compatible" 2x or 4x or whateverthef*ck speed MX-400 card that TCWO has on its website (I'm too tired to look right now) doesn't physically fit in my slot. Give it to me, I'll make it fit! (sound of rubber surgical glove snapping and lid of Crisco jar opening...) I'll even connect the ground strap to my wris****ch... Then get one from Newegg. My earlier suggestion still stands, minus the snide part, unless you plan on upgrading the CPU as well anytime in the near future (or at least before the supply of Tualatin Celeron 1.4s goes byebye...) If, on the other hand, you're talking about that L-shaped part that sticks out past the end of the AGP slot, it's supposed to be that way unless the motherboard has a retention-clip part to grab that part of the card. I'm not. I was talking about the way the cards are comparatively bevelled on the bottom; one (the preinstalled 3dfx) fits because it's properly grooved, and the other (the new Nvidia, 4x I think) didn't because it's apparently not meant to fit in my AGP slot. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pc problems after g card upgrade + sp2 | ben reed | Homebuilt PC's | 9 | November 30th 04 01:04 AM |
Is Dell P1110 21" monitor the same as Liyama S102GT 21" monitor? | private person | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | February 25th 04 04:56 PM |
Bad news for ATI: Nvidia to 'own' ATI at CeBit - no pixel shader 3.0 support in R420 (long) | NV55 | Ati Videocards | 12 | February 24th 04 06:29 AM |
Response by Nvidia concerning HL2 *warning, lengthy post, strong opinion content, some bad langwidge* NC-17 rating administered... | Dave | Ati Videocards | 28 | September 14th 03 05:51 PM |
Kyle Bennett (HardOCP) blasts NVIDIA | Radeon350 | Ati Videocards | 12 | August 13th 03 09:19 PM |