Sempron warning

"Wes Newell" wrote
Just as a little test, I'm adding a second sigline manually to this
message after the original one. And then we'll see what happens. Or I
will, i guess if your reader doesn't support it, you won't.:-)

I see them!

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm
The manual sigline is below this.

--
And this is the manually added one.

"Wes Newell" wrote
So you see, it deletes only the last occurance of the the sigline
sequence. Guess there's no need to bother the authors. Are you happy now?
:-)

Sure, if you are. ;-)


--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at

Thanks, robots.

"Wes Newell" wrote
just entereed text.:-) Siglines are automatically inserted by the reader.

No wonder I was confused. I looked in my sigs and by chance, at one where I
apparently had entered the dash dash space myself.

When I use it I get a dash dash space.
But when I use one where I didn't enter a dash dash space I get one anyhow.

Apparently I copied that first sig in from a message and when I use it
Outlook Express is smart enough not to put another dash dash space.

So you're right.
--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at

Thanks, robots.

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:59:05 -0700, Ed Light wrote:


"Wes Newell" wrote
Just as a little test, I'm adding a second sigline manually to this
message after the original one. And then we'll see what happens. Or I
will, i guess if your reader doesn't support it, you won't.:-)

I see them!

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm
The manual sigline is below this.

--
And this is the manually added one.


Yes, I know you see them. You are supposed to see them in a message. it's
when you hit reply and the new message window comes up that it is
deleted.. Note that the bottom one was missing in the reply I did. That's
because the newsreader deleted it when I replied to it.

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm

"Wes Newell" wrote in message
newsan.2004.08.30.09.08.47.308876@TAKEOUTverizon .net...
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:59:05 -0700, Ed Light wrote:


"Wes Newell" wrote
Just as a little test, I'm adding a second sigline manually to this
message after the original one. And then we'll see what happens. Or I
will, i guess if your reader doesn't support it, you won't.:-)

I see them!

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm
The manual sigline is below this.

--
And this is the manually added one.


Yes, I know you see them. You are supposed to see them in a message. it's
when you hit reply and the new message window comes up that it is
deleted.. Note that the bottom one was missing in the reply I did. That's
because the newsreader deleted it when I replied to it.

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm

OK Wes. Stop wasting your energy over it!


--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at

Thanks, robots.

"Ed Light" So you're right.
--
Ed Light

Wow, now I can sleep better.
WTF do you two waste bandwidth using a sig anyways?
As if anyone besides yourselves really cares.

On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 03:02:59 +0000, Buffalo wrote:


"Ed Light" So you're right.
--
Ed Light

Wow, now I can sleep better.
WTF do you two waste bandwidth using a sig anyways?
As if anyone besides yourselves really cares.

Can't speak for Ed, but I use mine so I can just point people to it when
they need info. The people that need the info will understand.

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm

"Wes Newell" wrote in message
newsan.2004.08.31.05.36.59.679195@TAKEOUTverizon .net...
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 03:02:59 +0000, Buffalo wrote:


"Ed Light" So you're right.
--
Ed Light

Wow, now I can sleep better.
WTF do you two waste bandwidth using a sig anyways?
As if anyone besides yourselves really cares.

Can't speak for Ed, but I use mine so I can just point people to it when
they need info. The people that need the info will understand.

No sig, eh. If everyone did that all the power stations could cut back, I
guess. Plus less wear and tear on wires and fiber optics.


--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at

Thanks, robots.

"Wes Newell" On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 03:02:59 +0000, Buffalo wrote:


"Ed Light" So you're right.
--
Ed Light

Wow, now I can sleep better.
WTF do you two waste bandwidth using a sig anyways?
As if anyone besides yourselves really cares.

Can't speak for Ed, but I use mine so I can just point people to it
when
they need info. The people that need the info will understand.

I know the reason, I was just having a little fun.

"Buffalo" wrote


I know the reason, I was just having a little fun.

Oh! Heh!


--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at

Thanks, robots.