If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dell Dimension 3000 + Pentium 2.8 and 256RAM
Hi, have just got one of these and thought it would be much quicker
than it is. Just running Windows it doesn't seem much better than my 1.2Ghz Athlon with 512Mb. Any ideas? No new software's been installed and it'll only be used for basic Internet browsing but it just seems way too slow. Thanks, Ed. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed_Zep" wrote in message oups.com... Hi, have just got one of these and thought it would be much quicker than it is. Just running Windows it doesn't seem much better than my 1.2Ghz Athlon with 512Mb. Any ideas? No new software's been installed and it'll only be used for basic Internet browsing but it just seems way too slow. Thanks, Ed. The Dimension 3000 uses Shared memory, so not all of the 256MB is available for the OS and applications. You desparately need more memory. Tom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Upgrade to 512MB for an apples vs. apples comparison. Windows XP cannot run
adequately in 256MB, regardless of Microsoft's hype. I sell a lot of memory upgrades locally... Ben Myers On 9 Aug 2005 16:03:07 -0700, "Ed_Zep" wrote: Hi, have just got one of these and thought it would be much quicker than it is. Just running Windows it doesn't seem much better than my 1.2Ghz Athlon with 512Mb. Any ideas? No new software's been installed and it'll only be used for basic Internet browsing but it just seems way too slow. Thanks, Ed. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ben_myers_spam_me_not @ charter.net (Ben Myers) wrote in message ... Upgrade to 512MB for an apples vs. apples comparison. Windows XP cannot run adequately in 256MB, regardless of Microsoft's hype. I sell a lot of memory upgrades locally... Ben Myers What Tom and Ben said. Plus, run 'msconfig' and turn off all the bravo sierra, then go to My Computer / properties / advanced /performance and select custom. Enable/check only the effects you want in the XP eye candy. You'll be amazed at the difference in the system response. AND, -lastly- if the machine has NIS on it (Norton Internet Security), remove that POS from Add/Remove and then download AVG 7 free edition. There are (4) entries in add/remove, so don't miss any. That is all. I'm looking at the *exact* system configuration you've got at this very moment (except with 512mb of RAM), and it was still pig slow until I made the adjustments above. Stew |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
LOL!
I would imagine that an Athlon 1.4 with 1Gb of memory would slaughter the above machine in the 'real world'... To be truthful, Dell sell these base systems to idiots... the 2.8GHz gets the punters in but in reality, the memory does the real work. T. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... LOL! I would imagine that an Athlon 1.4 with 1Gb of memory would slaughter the above machine in the 'real world'... To be truthful, Dell sell these base systems to idiots... the 2.8GHz gets the punters in but in reality, the memory does the real work. T. I wouldn't disagree with that. I've seen some older OEM Athlons that were exceedingly quick/crisp with what I thought were less than ideal RAM. If I built today (ie-for gamiing), I'd almost surely build an AMD64 system around an N-Force chipset, or I'd fall back to a 478-pin Intel 875.... Stew |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Memory is clearly the best investment anyone can make on any system
running XP. PC manufacturers should be pushing for more memory rather than pure CPU in new machine purchases. I found 256Mb bad back in 2001 when XP was released. Even as little as 768Mb (ie. a cheap 512Mb upgrade) makes for a much smoother XP experience. My personal machine is not fast... I run an Athlon XP-M at 2,400Mhz but I think the 1.5Gb of DDR lets XP really fly. T. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Right! XPee sucks up all the memory it can get, and uses it very ineffectively.
Install a few bit and pieces of hardware that add their own programs to run at startup (e.g. your typical inkjet printer bidirectional management software, Norton Internet Security, etc.), and more useful memory vanishes. A system memory upgrade is the most cost-effective way to speed up any computer running XPee. And just you wait for Vista. I cannot even imagine what a huge memory hog it will be... Ben Myers On 10 Aug 2005 09:11:10 -0700, wrote: Memory is clearly the best investment anyone can make on any system running XP. PC manufacturers should be pushing for more memory rather than pure CPU in new machine purchases. I found 256Mb bad back in 2001 when XP was released. Even as little as 768Mb (ie. a cheap 512Mb upgrade) makes for a much smoother XP experience. My personal machine is not fast... I run an Athlon XP-M at 2,400Mhz but I think the 1.5Gb of DDR lets XP really fly. T. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|