If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Samsung QVO -- correction: it's not slow
Other than a quick couple file copies, not sure what happened after I formatted it. I put together a 250G copy operation and moved it onto the QVO and into the computer it's intended, and it was 15% faster than the above format and a few fast-check writes, from a mechanical (or at the time then a SSD drive), 30% faster writing from another SSD, and 60% faster for about the first 10 minutes, or about an 100G accumulative whereupon the QVO dropped by 30% thruput speeds, possibly to what "it is" at this point. Normal, to say, for a SSD in my little SATA world. Temperatures were unexpected. I'd just stomped on HP for being hot. The QVO, perhaps as many in the SSD field, at sustained copying ran 133F, dropped to 118F after, apparently to resides at 109F where it's now moved into the other computer for an audio server. The other Samsung, a 2T mechanical drive, suspecting it for brief source audio interruptions, (they can get very nasty on progressive deterioration), looking over its SMART table, the reallocation even/pending error count was high;- reallocated sectors, another field, would also have been off although not perhaps indicatively as damnably. A five-hour ChkDsk lowered both fields, and I'm back to listening for suspect controller or drive recovery pauses. Reallocation is one thing, pending errors can be worse ... eminently failing media. Other than that, the 1T QVO seems to be accessed more often (HDD activity LED) than with the same files, and how they were accessed, less often, on the 256G HP unit I'd put temporarily on the same cable. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Samsung QVO -- correction: it's not slow
On Mon, 03 Aug 2020 20:00:48 -0400, Flasherly
wrote: Other than that, the 1T QVO seems to be accessed more often (HDD activity LED) than with the same files, and how they were accessed, less often, on the 256G HP unit I'd put temporarily on the same cable. That stopped. Probably the caching library update settings I'd changed to be less stringent on the audio engine. Thus and therefore, it must be a SSD. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help with color correction | James King | Printers | 5 | June 20th 09 10:11 AM |
CORRECTION | Heywood Jablowme | Nvidia Videocards | 0 | January 23rd 06 12:44 AM |
correction of web address | Gray | Printers | 1 | December 19th 04 05:25 PM |
correction of web address | Gray | Printers | 0 | December 19th 04 08:28 AM |
[hd for pc always on]Samsung slow than other hd?..& 5.4k rpm that i can find new actually? | Danzig Glenn | Storage (alternative) | 5 | July 17th 03 09:01 PM |