If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dual Channel memory problem
Hello, I have a 3 ghtz P4 machine with 512meg of dual channel memory running
windows 98 and windows xp. No problems whatsoever. I recently upgraded my memory to 1 gig of the SAME memory (another two 256 dual channel chips). I am know seeing all kinds of problems (blue screens, out of memory msgs, etc) in windows 98 while windows xp works perfectly. Is there any possibility the additional memory could be causing problems in win98? I got the exact same type/model number of memory (OCZ memory) and it's running in dual channel mode correctly according to the bios. Any ideas would be appreciated. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 20:17:27 GMT, "eiurgoleiop" wrote:
Hello, I have a 3 ghtz P4 machine with 512meg of dual channel memory running windows 98 and windows xp. No problems whatsoever. I recently upgraded my memory to 1 gig of the SAME memory (another two 256 dual channel chips). I am know seeing all kinds of problems (blue screens, out of memory msgs, etc) in windows 98 while windows xp works perfectly. Is there any possibility the additional memory could be causing problems in win98? I got the exact same type/model number of memory (OCZ memory) and it's running in dual channel mode correctly according to the bios. Any ideas would be appreciated. The good news is it's not a hardware problem, it's an OS bug. You got bit by the rogue Win98 vcache (file caching) driver, which rears its nasty head anytime you have more than 512MB of memory on a Win98 machine. You can work around this problem - essentially limiting the amount of memory that the vcache driver can use - by adding a line or two to your windirsystem.ini file, as follows: [vcache] MaxFileCache=262144 The [vcache] line is optional, it's just a label. The value of MaxFileCache must be smaller than 512MB and is expressed in KBytes. The example value shown above allows the vcache driver to use up to 256MB of memory for file caching. Make this change to system.ini, reboot Win98, and you shoot be good to go. The only thing you lose is the maximum file cache capacity... /daytripper |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The issue with over 512M of ram is that with Win9x you have
to limit vcache, in system.ini, to no more that 512M. Over in the M$ groups, the consensus seems to be 70% of your available ram for less than 768M. It's specified in kilobytes. NT based systems don't have the problem. Put this in your system.ini ----- [vcache] MaxFileCache=524000 "eiurgoleiop" wrote in message .. . Hello, I have a 3 ghtz P4 machine with 512meg of dual channel memory running windows 98 and windows xp. No problems whatsoever. I recently upgraded my memory to 1 gig of the SAME memory (another two 256 dual channel chips). I am know seeing all kinds of problems (blue screens, out of memory msgs, etc) in windows 98 while windows xp works perfectly. Is there any possibility the additional memory could be causing problems in win98? I got the exact same type/model number of memory (OCZ memory) and it's running in dual channel mode correctly according to the bios. Any ideas would be appreciated. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Win 98, be design, can only recognize up to 512 MB of RAM. If you install
more, the system will not be stable. -- DaveW "eiurgoleiop" wrote in message .. . Hello, I have a 3 ghtz P4 machine with 512meg of dual channel memory running windows 98 and windows xp. No problems whatsoever. I recently upgraded my memory to 1 gig of the SAME memory (another two 256 dual channel chips). I am know seeing all kinds of problems (blue screens, out of memory msgs, etc) in windows 98 while windows xp works perfectly. Is there any possibility the additional memory could be causing problems in win98? I got the exact same type/model number of memory (OCZ memory) and it's running in dual channel mode correctly according to the bios. Any ideas would be appreciated. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 23:25:13 GMT, "DaveW" wrote:
"eiurgoleiop" wrote in message . .. Hello, I have a 3 ghtz P4 machine with 512meg of dual channel memory running windows 98 and windows xp. No problems whatsoever. I recently upgraded my memory to 1 gig of the SAME memory (another two 256 dual channel chips). I am know seeing all kinds of problems (blue screens, out of memory msgs, etc) in windows 98 while windows xp works perfectly. Is there any possibility the additional memory could be causing problems in win98? I got the exact same type/model number of memory (OCZ memory) and it's running in dual channel mode correctly according to the bios. Any ideas would be appreciated. Win 98, be design, can only recognize up to 512 MB of RAM. If you install more, the system will not be stable. That statement, along with the top-posting, is incorrect. hth ;-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
eiurgoleiop said in :
Hello, I have a 3 ghtz P4 machine with 512meg of dual channel memory running windows 98 and windows xp. No problems whatsoever. I recently upgraded my memory to 1 gig of the SAME memory (another two 256 dual channel chips). I am know seeing all kinds of problems (blue screens, out of memory msgs, etc) in windows 98 while windows xp works perfectly. Is there any possibility the additional memory could be causing problems in win98? I got the exact same type/model number of memory (OCZ memory) and it's running in dual channel mode correctly according to the bios. Any ideas would be appreciated. If you want to read a Microsoft KB article regarding what all the others = are citing, see: "Out of Memory" Error Messages with Large Amounts of RAM Installed http://support.microsoft.com/?id=3D253912 As noted in the last paragraph, setting a large aperture for your AGP = video card can exacerbate the problem. So reduce the BIOS setting for = AGP aperture down to 64MB unless you have benchmarked your *critical* = applications to see that they do indeed run faster with a larger AGP = aperture. Obviously something like word processing won't benefit since = YOU are by far the slowest component and the software is repeatedly = waiting an digital eon between your keystrokes. Besides, using a high = AGP aperture size rarely affords any benefit in performance (since you = want apps that use the much faster video RAM on the video card than use = the much slower system RAM, so get a video card with lots of onboard = VRAM). See http://www.tweak3d.net/articles/aperture-size/ and = http://www.ocfaq.com/article.php/ove...ing/vidcard/43 regarding the = setting of AGP aperture. The more onboard VRAM you have on your video = card, the less likely that you need to steal any slower system RAM. = Also, many games are coded to NOT use more memory than what you have on = your video card (or assume that you only have 64MB of VRAM) so = increasing the AGP aperture size won't help them run faster. Start with = a 64MB AGP aperture, and only if you notice stuttering, like within your = game, then increase it. Other than possible for games (which don't code = to restrict themselves to remain within VRAM) and maybe CAD software, = I'm not sure for what else you would need a large APG aperture. --=20 __________________________________________________ __________ *** Post replies to newsgroup. Share with others. *** Email domain =3D ".com" AND append "=3DNEWS=3D" to Subject. __________________________________________________ __________ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dualchannel DDR | DevilsPGD | General | 6 | May 30th 04 11:50 PM |
How identical for dual channel support | Oliver | General | 1 | March 2nd 04 12:50 AM |
Difference between Dual channel and Non-Dual channel? | Chris Stolworthy | General | 5 | January 6th 04 09:41 AM |
Memory Problem found using a POST code reader | Li'l ol' me | General | 1 | October 18th 03 03:49 PM |
What utilities can tell me if hyper-threading or dual channel DDR memory is working? | gotmail? | General | 0 | August 10th 03 07:10 PM |