Infineon execs fined and jailed for price fixing

Tim Sullivan wrote:
: LOL - I sure you guys will try to continue to deny it just like good
: old Sherry, the ex-Infineon employee who is now an "independent"
: analyst.
snip

You still here you loser shill? Geez you're pathetic!

j.

LOL - I sure you guys will try to continue to deny it just like good
old Sherry, the ex-Infineon employee who is now an "independent"
analyst.

http://www.forbes.com/enterprisetech..._1202infx.html
Legal
Infineon Execs Plead Guilty
Arik Hesseldahl, 12.02.04, 6:30 PM ET

NEW YORK - With four of its executives pleading guilty to price-fixing
charges today, Infineon will have a hard time arguing that it didn't
fix prices in its ongoing litigation with Rambus.

The two companies have been fighting a protracted legal war over
royalties and patents for four years before a U.S. federal court in
Richmond, Va. Rambus (nasdaq: RMBS - news - people ) initially lost in
2003, but later won before an appeals court decision which ordered the
two companies back to the lower court to re-argue their cases under a
different set of legal assumptions generally thought to be more
favorable to Rambus. The retrial is expected to get underway next
year.

In today's legal moves, the Infineon (nyse: IFX - news - people )
executives agreed to serve up to six months in prison and pay $250,000
in fines. According to papers filed with the U.S. District Court in
San Francisco, the execs, Heinrich Florian, Gunter Hefner, Peter
Schaefer and T. Rudd Corwin admitted they were involved in a
conspiracy during 2001 and 2002 to fix the prices of computer memory
chips known as Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM). Corwin, is a U.S.
citizen, the other three are German nationals. Infineon spokesman
Christophe Liedtke said that two of the employees have left the
company, while the other two have been reassigned to other divisions.

The pleas are the latest moves in an investigation by the U.S.
Department of Justice that has swept several companies including
Infineon, Micron Technologies (nyse: MU - news - people ) and South
Korea's Hynix Semiconductor in its wake.

Liedtke said there's no connection between the DOJ case and the Rambus
litigation.

"They are totally disconnected," he said. "The case with the DOJ
focused on the selling of DRAM to specific customers. Rambus is trying
to tie them together."

Infineon is one of four targets of a $5 billion antitrust suit Rambus
filed in May, in which Rambus alleges "concerted and unlawful efforts
by a group of the largest semiconductor manufacturers in the world to
eliminate competition and stifle innovation." Micron, Hynix and German
electronics giant Siemens (nyse: SI - news - people ) are the other
three defendants in that suit.

Rambus' complaint focuses on a period in time when it was trying to
promote a flavor of DRAM chip it had designed, known as Direct Rambus
DRAM or just RDRAM for short, as the standard type of memory for
personal computers. For a time it had Intel (nasdaq: INTC - news -
people ) in its corner, until memory chip companies including Micron,
Infineon, the former chipmaking unit of Siemens, and others balked at
producing the RDRAM chips because they said they the chips were
difficult to make, but mostly because they didn't want to pay
royalties to Rambus.

RDRAM ultimately failed to gain traction in the PC market, while
another memory chip technology known as Double Data Rate DRAM (DDR)
became the favored standard. In response, Rambus claimed patents on
that flavor of memory and said that companies building DDR chips owed
it royalty payments.

Spokespeople for Rambus did not immediately return calls seeking
comment on the guilty pleas by the four Infineon employees.

Analyst Sherry Garber of Semico Research, Scottsdale, Ariz., called
the pleas "astonishing."

Garber says that if memory chipmakers did indeed conspire to fix
prices they did a pretty poor job of it. "It's hard for me to figure
out how much collusion there was since the companies involved were
losing money at the time."

The executives' criminal pleas are the second in a wide-reaching
investigation in the memory chip industry that the DOJ launched in
June 2002. The other criminal case related to the investigation came
in December 2003, when Alfred P. Censullo, a Micron sales manager
based in upstate New York agreed to plead guilty to obstructing a
grand jury investigation after admitting he altered handwritten notes
and withheld 14 pages of notes pertaining to phone calls among Micron
sales managers that concerned the price of DRAM chips from Micron's
competitors (see: "Micron Guilty Plea May Be Just the Start").

In September of this year, Infineon pled guilty to charges that it
conspired to fix prices and has presented some of the executives
responsible (see: "Infineon's Problem Plea"). In that plea, Infineon
agreed to pay a $160 million fine over the next five years.