What the heck does this mean?

CATALYST 4.11 includes a memory allocation bug fix for all AGP RADEON=99 =

products with 256 of MB of memory that significantly improves=20
performance for applications that make intensive us of graphics memory

Ron

"Rockin Ronnie" wrote in message
...
CATALYST 4.11 includes a memory allocation bug fix for all AGP RADEON™
products with 256 of MB of memory that significantly improves
performance for applications that make intensive us of graphics memory

Ron

it means with previous drivers ppl with 256mb cards had performance problems
thta's fixed with the new driver

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:53:13 GMT, "Sleepy"
wrote:



it means with previous drivers ppl with 256mb cards had performance problems
thta's fixed with the new driver

Actually, that issue was fixed in the last set of drivers so I don't
know why they list it as a new fix for this set too. Same with the
KOTOR issue too.

"Trout" wrote in message

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:53:13 GMT, "Sleepy"
wrote:



it means with previous drivers ppl with 256mb cards had performance
problems thta's fixed with the new driver

Actually, that issue was fixed in the last set of drivers so I don't
know why they list it as a new fix for this set too. Same with the
KOTOR issue too.

was it really fixed? - 3DMark05 still runs awfully slow on my 9600Pro 512MB
(with cat 4.11) resulting in a score of about 1500

"SteveK" wrote in message

"Trout" wrote in message

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:53:13 GMT, "Sleepy"
wrote:



it means with previous drivers ppl with 256mb cards had performance
problems thta's fixed with the new driver

Actually, that issue was fixed in the last set of drivers so I don't
know why they list it as a new fix for this set too. Same with the
KOTOR issue too.

was it really fixed? - 3DMark05 still runs awfully slow on my 9600Pro
512MB (with cat 4.11) resulting in a score of about 1500

SORRY, meant 256 not 512...

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 16:31:48 +1000, "SteveK"
wrote:


was it really fixed? - 3DMark05 still runs awfully slow on my 9600Pro 512MB
(with cat 4.11) resulting in a score of about 1500

They listed it as fixed in 4.10 drivers. I don't have a 256mb card
though so can't say for certain.

Trout wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 16:31:48 +1000, "SteveK"
wrote:



was it really fixed? - 3DMark05 still runs awfully slow on my 9600Pro 512MB
(with cat 4.11) resulting in a score of about 1500


They listed it as fixed in 4.10 drivers. I don't have a 256mb card
though so can't say for certain.
Perhaps this begs the question. Do those who have installed the new
drivers and who have 256 megs of ram on their boards, notice a difference?

Ron

"Rockin Ronnie" wrote in message

Trout wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 16:31:48 +1000, "SteveK"
wrote:



was it really fixed? - 3DMark05 still runs awfully slow on my 9600Pro
512MB (with cat 4.11) resulting in a score of about 1500


They listed it as fixed in 4.10 drivers. I don't have a 256mb card
though so can't say for certain.
Perhaps this begs the question. Do those who have installed the new
drivers and who have 256 megs of ram on their boards, notice a difference?

Ron

Which software is fully utilising a 256MB card? - benchmarks? So far all
benchmarks (tested 3DMark01, 03, 05) results are exactly the same on my Rad
9600Pro.

Rockin Ronnie wrote:

CATALYST 4.11 includes a memory allocation bug fix for all AGP RADEON™
products with 256 of MB of memory that significantly improves
performance for applications that make intensive us of graphics memory

Ron

It means you have the comprehension skills of a gnat.

Gordon Scott wrote:
Rockin Ronnie wrote:
=20
CATALYST 4.11 includes a memory allocation bug fix for all AGP RADEON=99=

products with 256 of MB of memory that significantly improves
performance for applications that make intensive us of graphics memory

Ron
=20
=20
It means you have the comprehension skills of a gnat.
If you had anything intelligent to say, you would. In my view you don't!

Ron