If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best Motherboard with On-Board Raid Advice
Can anyone tell me what the best P4 motherboard with on-board raid is.
I'd like to use it with my existing 40 Gig ATA Maxtors? I've been reading posts about the Abit KT-7, but those posts are pretty old. Thanks in advance |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Can anyone tell me what the best P4 motherboard with on-board raid is. I'd like to use it with my existing 40 Gig ATA Maxtors? I've been reading posts about the Abit KT-7, but those posts are pretty old. Thanks in advance The abit KT-7 is a atlon board |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:32:00 -0500, Tom wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the best P4 motherboard with on-board raid is. I'd like to use it with my existing 40 Gig ATA Maxtors? I've been reading posts about the Abit KT-7, but those posts are pretty old. IMHO don't get on-board raid, just get a seperate raid card for whatever motherboard you want or use software raid if your OS supports it. -- Ray |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Ray wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:32:00 -0500, Tom wrote: Can anyone tell me what the best P4 motherboard with on-board raid is. I'd like to use it with my existing 40 Gig ATA Maxtors? I've been reading posts about the Abit KT-7, but those posts are pretty old. IMHO don't get on-board raid, just get a seperate raid card for whatever motherboard you want On board RAID controllers do just fine for simple things like stripe sets and mirroring. For more sophisticated RAIDs, a good caching RAID card only costs as much as another large drive. or use software raid if your OS supports it. You definitely only want to do that *only* when hardware RAID is not available to you. A two-drive software mirror or stripe set typically triples the load put on your CPU compared to the load imposed by even a cheap Promise or HighPoint RAID controller. Most systems don't have the horsepower to both run a heavy app like video encoding and also drive a software RAID - so trying to do something like encoding video to a partition that is part of a software RAID often reduces performance below what you would get if you just used a single-drive system. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:12:02 -0600, Rob Stow wrote:
snip You definitely only want to do that *only* when hardware RAID is not available to you. A two-drive software mirror or stripe set typically triples the load put on your CPU compared to the load imposed by even a cheap Promise or HighPoint RAID controller. Most systems don't have the horsepower to both run a heavy app like video encoding and also drive a software RAID - so trying to do something like encoding video to a partition that is part of a software RAID often reduces performance below what you would get if you just used a single-drive system. Eh, this isn't correct, by any means. I hate to break this to you, but those cheap Promise and HighPoint RAID cards are not hardware RAID cards by any means, they are simply IDE controller cards with enough BIOS glue to fool a OS (Windows) to think you have one drive instead of two. That's why you need special OS driver's to use them, because _all_ the RAID logic is performed by the CPU, not the RAID card. Also, a modern UDMA drive has almost a zero effect on a modern CPU; with software RAID all the CPU has to do is the RAID logic, which isn't that bad. It certainly won't change the RAID performance. -- Love tells us many things that are not so. -- Krainian Proverb |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the info guys, but if someone still wanted to get a P4
board with on-board raid, what would the best choice be? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Asus P4C800-E Deluxe is the best raid enabled P4 motherboard currently
available. -- DaveW Tom wrote in message ... Can anyone tell me what the best P4 motherboard with on-board raid is. I'd like to use it with my existing 40 Gig ATA Maxtors? I've been reading posts about the Abit KT-7, but those posts are pretty old. Thanks in advance |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:05:53 -0500, Tom wrote:
Thanks for the info guys, but if someone still wanted to get a P4 board with on-board raid, what would the best choice be? Intel 875 chipset from your favorite manufacturer... Intel and Asus are usually favored but buy based on the features you need, these are expensive boards. Dave |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:12:02 -0600, Rob Stow wrote:
Ray wrote: IMHO don't get on-board raid, just get a seperate raid card for whatever motherboard you want On board RAID controllers do just fine for simple things like stripe sets and mirroring. Right, they do just as well as a seperate raid card with the same chipset at a SLIGHTLY lower cost but you're giving up a fair bit of flexability. If that's the approach you want to take why bother building a system at all, just buy a Dell and be done with it. or use software raid if your OS supports it. You definitely only want to do that *only* when hardware RAID is not available to you. A two-drive software mirror or stripe set typically triples the load put on your CPU compared to the load imposed by even a cheap Promise or HighPoint RAID controller. That's just plain bull. The cheap "raid" controllers whether they are built into the MB or as add-ons ARE software raid. If you're seeing 3x more cpu load with software raid (for RAID 0 or RAID 1) you're doing something wrong or there is some other factor at work. Most systems don't have the horsepower to both run a heavy app like video encoding and also drive a software RAID - so trying to do something like encoding video to a partition that is part of a software RAID often reduces performance below what you would get if you just used a single-drive system. Encoding video wouldn't even push the limits of a single low end drive 2 years ago in most cases. In most cases we're only talking about a couple MB (or less depending on what you're generating) of fresh data being generated per second, hell you could pipe that over ethernet if you wanted to. In a sense, software raid has the same advantage as a cheap pci raid card, in both cases if you have a system failure you can transplant your data to a different machine and have access to it almost immediately. Likewise it's possible to upgrade your motherboard without disrupting your RAID array. -- Ray |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On 23 Dec 2003 07:04:01 GMT, Ray wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:12:02 -0600, Rob Stow wrote: Ray wrote: IMHO don't get on-board raid, just get a seperate raid card for whatever motherboard you want On board RAID controllers do just fine for simple things like stripe sets and mirroring. Right, they do just as well as a seperate raid card with the same chipset at a SLIGHTLY lower cost but you're giving up a fair bit of flexability. If that's the approach you want to take why bother building a system at all, just buy a Dell and be done with it. or use software raid if your OS supports it. You definitely only want to do that *only* when hardware RAID is not available to you. A two-drive software mirror or stripe set typically triples the load put on your CPU compared to the load imposed by even a cheap Promise or HighPoint RAID controller. That's just plain bull. The cheap "raid" controllers whether they are built into the MB or as add-ons ARE software raid. If you're seeing 3x more cpu load with software raid (for RAID 0 or RAID 1) you're doing something wrong or there is some other factor at work. And yet those are the kinds of differences reported for even different "cheap" RAID controllers a couple of years back. Most systems don't have the horsepower to both run a heavy app like video encoding and also drive a software RAID - so trying to do something like encoding video to a partition that is part of a software RAID often reduces performance below what you would get if you just used a single-drive system. Encoding video wouldn't even push the limits of a single low end drive 2 years ago in most cases. In most cases we're only talking about a couple MB (or less depending on what you're generating) of fresh data being generated per second, hell you could pipe that over ethernet if you wanted to. 2MB/s effective over 10Base2/T? I think not.... not even close. In a sense, software raid has the same advantage as a cheap pci raid card, in both cases if you have a system failure you can transplant your data to a different machine and have access to it almost immediately. Likewise it's possible to upgrade your motherboard without disrupting your RAID array. Even the cheap RAID cards support things like hot swap/rebuild and there *are* times when you may want to change the RAID config *before* the OS and drivers get to do their thing on the drives. There may not be a lot of hardware assist but it doesn't take much to make a difference. Rgds, George Macdonald "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me?? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Converting RAID 0 array to RAID 0+1 - Advice sought. | Mod | General | 0 | December 1st 03 03:40 PM |
Incompatible RAID controller? | @drian | General | 1 | November 9th 03 07:38 PM |
help with motherboard choice | S.Boardman | General | 30 | October 20th 03 10:23 PM |
Advice needed on Choosing a Motherboard and CPU | ashertece | General | 2 | August 23rd 03 05:16 PM |
help. ga-7vrxp raid trouble, compatability and warning | todd elliott | General | 0 | July 17th 03 06:50 PM |