If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning photo prints and negatives
Hi All,
I am very new to scanning but hope to understand very quickly how to handle a situation i have. This might therefore be trifle to the experts out there. I have many 4x6 and 5x7 inch photo prints developed from an equal number of negatives, from a film camera. I want to ask the following questions: I need to scan these and display them on a monitor in 800x600 resolution at the highest quality. I don't want to bother much about printing them out on a printer. ( not yet Q1) Is there a scanner out there that can take in multiple prints ( from a tray say,) and create files out of them ? I want to display the files on a website. I cannot spend so much time scanning individual photos. Q2) If I were to scan individual photos (because thats all I can do with my current scanner), what is the workflow involved going from a 5"x7" photo print to 800x600 display on monitor ? I currently have an HP scanjet 3500c Q3) If I go via scanning the negatives route, then I am absolutely new to this. Which scanner is the most economical yet provides high quality? And is there a combo scanner that i can use to scan negatives and positive prints? Are these devices popular among consumers. Meaning should one always go to a pro photo lab for this kind of scanning ? Q4) What about taking digital photographs of prints? Is this approach a suitable alternative ? It sounds cumbersome considering one has to always have the right light falling on the photo print to capture it into the digicam effectively? Does one use macro mode for this ? or Thanks a ton. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning photo prints and negatives
wrote in message
oups.com... Hi All, I am very new to scanning but hope to understand very quickly how to handle a situation i have. This might therefore be trifle to the experts out there. I have many 4x6 and 5x7 inch photo prints developed from an equal number of negatives, from a film camera. I want to ask the following questions: I need to scan these and display them on a monitor in 800x600 resolution at the highest quality. I don't want to bother much about printing them out on a printer. ( not yet Q1) Is there a scanner out there that can take in multiple prints ( from a tray say,) and create files out of them ? I want to display the files on a website. I cannot spend so much time scanning individual photos. Q2) If I were to scan individual photos (because thats all I can do with my current scanner), what is the workflow involved going from a 5"x7" photo print to 800x600 display on monitor ? I currently have an HP scanjet 3500c Q3) If I go via scanning the negatives route, then I am absolutely new to this. Which scanner is the most economical yet provides high quality? And is there a combo scanner that i can use to scan negatives and positive prints? Are these devices popular among consumers. Meaning should one always go to a pro photo lab for this kind of scanning ? Q4) What about taking digital photographs of prints? Is this approach a suitable alternative ? It sounds cumbersome considering one has to always have the right light falling on the photo print to capture it into the digicam effectively? Does one use macro mode for this ? or Thanks a ton. Hi. There are scanners which can scan Prints and Film. They usually have "Photo" tagged onto their model name / number. All of them would easily cope with producing 800 x 600 Jpeg files from prints or film, for on-screen display. Quality is not an issue unless you compress these small files down and then make a few "Saves". A number can scan several prints, on the platen, at a time, and automatically produce individual files. Quality becomes more of an issue if, or when, you decide to make Prints. Provided you are not planning on making anything bigger than a 10 x 8 from a 6 x 4 Print, a Flat Bed scanner should still cope, but you will need to decide for yourself whether the quality is good enough. The problem is not so much the scanner, more that the detail will be lacking in the original print. You will be able to pull a lot more detail out of a negative or slide, but be aware that the resolution figures quoted for Flat Bed Scanners, can be rather optimistic. Dedicated Film scanner resolution figures are much more accurate, but these are not cheap machines. Roy G |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning photo prints and negatives
"Roy G" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... I did not mention Workflow. Scan print at 200 Ppi- Save as jpeg - import into a Photo Editing Program ( if not already there) - Adjust density and Colour using "Levels" or "Curves" - Crop as required - Resize (with resampling or interpolation On) to 800 x 600 - Save, using as little Compression as needed, to get the image to an Email-able size, 80 to 100 K Depending on your Program, some of these steps can be combined. PS Elements can Crop to a specific Size at a specific Resolution, irrespective of what size the Crop Rectangle seems to be on the image (if you preset it to 4 inches x 3 inches at 200Ppi, you will get an 800 x 600 pxl image, from any part of the original) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Scanning photo prints and negatives
Roy G wrote: "Roy G" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... I did not mention Workflow. Scan print at 200 Ppi- Save as jpeg - import into a Photo Editing Program ( if not already there) - Adjust density and Colour using "Levels" or "Curves" - Crop as required - Resize (with resampling or interpolation On) to 800 x 600 - Save, using as little Compression as needed, to get the image to an Email-able size, 80 to 100 K Depending on your Program, some of these steps can be combined. PS Elements can Crop to a specific Size at a specific Resolution, irrespective of what size the Crop Rectangle seems to be on the image (if you preset it to 4 inches x 3 inches at 200Ppi, you will get an 800 x 600 pxl image, from any part of the original) Thanks for your reply, I'll try out this workflow. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best DPI for photos? | Geronimo | Scanners | 3 | November 2nd 05 02:15 AM |
Epson Perfection 1650 | Bob Fallona | Scanners | 6 | August 17th 05 06:12 AM |
Flash! New Epson RX500 = 6-color photo printer + 2400dpi scanner+ 35mm adapter + stand-alone printing in one! | David Chien | Printers | 4 | December 18th 04 04:06 AM |
Flash! New Epson RX500 = 6-color photo printer + 2400dpi scanner+ 35mm adapter + stand-alone printing in one! | David Chien | Printers | 0 | October 23rd 03 02:55 AM |
Cost of printing? | Bob Hosid | Printers | 16 | September 8th 03 05:44 PM |