If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Played Need for Speed Underground 2 demo....
I'm sure many ATI owners will find this initial impression interesting as
NFSU was a hot seller on PCs(I upgraded to a 9800 just for NFS) Just downloaded and played for about 2 hours the just released Need for Speed Underground 2 demo...and my initial view is disappointing. On my 3Ghz PC with Radeon 9800(oc'd) card the first thing that got me was the graphics, which look several levels worse than the original!? For a start, with nearly all the settings on max visual quality the city/world looks terrible, nowhere near as detailed or impressive as the first game. The cars look worse than the orginal, apart from a nice NOS flames effect which is pretty cool. But my biggest disappointment of all are the babes in the crowd and especially the ones that start the race- they look like badly drawn playstation 1 characters! Nooooooooooooooooooo! What have they done to them? Shame on you EA. On the plus side, the only new impressive graphical effect is the rainstorm graphics which has to be the most realistic I've yet seen. Pretty cool when a thunderstorm starts up in the middle of a race i gotta say. This demo is too close to the release date of the actual game to expect any drastic improvements so I would expect this is pretty much what the final release will look like. Something fishy altogether about the graphics - like they could have been better but have been simplified to 'fit' in with the console versions. Gameplay seems O.K. and it does have that 'one more go' effect so nothing wrong that. I know graphics are secondary to gameplay but when a game as ground-breaking visually and gameplay wise as NFSU is released, you'd expect the producers to outdo the original by several levels. I was definitely expecting more from this game after the first game used all available hardware so well - something that was stated in the first game's documention. NFSU 1 is one of my fav games of all time, certainly my fav racer of all time so this sequel had something to live up to. So far it hasn't. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On the plus side, the only new impressive graphical effect is the rainstorm
graphics which has to be the most realistic I've yet seen. Pretty cool when a thunderstorm starts up in the middle of a race i gotta say. How does this compare to the rain in NFS High Stakes? I always thought that the night and rain combo looked cool, here's a link to a video: http://jeffareid.net/cgi-bin/nfs4dc.wmv |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:26:24 +0100, "hg" wrote:
I'm sure many ATI owners will find this initial impression interesting as NFSU was a hot seller on PCs(I upgraded to a 9800 just for NFS) Which drivers are you using? I use the 4.4's which until now were the best all rounders for my 9700 Pro, but in the NFSU2 demo, all I see are the car and roadside lights! -- Andrew, contact via interpleb.blogspot.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Which drivers are you using? I use the 4.4's which until now were the
best all rounders for my 9700 Pro, but in the NFSU2 demo, all I see are the car and roadside lights! -- Andrew, contact via interpleb.blogspot.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question. I'm using the 4.9 beta Doom3 drivers - if you read the help file it actually says 4.9 ATI drivers are strongly recommended for Radeon cards. Looks like you'll have to dump the 4.4s to play this demo. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:17:35 +0100, "hg" wrote:
I'm using the 4.9 beta Doom3 drivers - if you read the help file it actually says 4.9 ATI drivers are strongly recommended for Radeon cards. Looks like you'll have to dump the 4.4s to play this demo. Thanks, I will try them :-) -- Andrew, contact via interpleb.blogspot.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeff Reid" wrote in message news:U2Tfd.19639$SW3.1806@fed1read01... On the plus side, the only new impressive graphical effect is the rainstorm graphics which has to be the most realistic I've yet seen. Pretty cool when a thunderstorm starts up in the middle of a race i gotta say. How does this compare to the rain in NFS High Stakes? I always thought that the night and rain combo looked cool, here's a link to a video: http://jeffareid.net/cgi-bin/nfs4dc.wmv The effect is similar but better in Underground 2 - the rain is heavier and road seems to become more reflective when wet so it overall the effect looks better because there are more lights around and the illumination of the rain by the headlights is better also. Only thing missing from Underground 2 is the spray coming up from behind the vehicle. Maybe that's something they will add for the release. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:49:21 -0400, "Tony DiMarzio"
wrote: Has anyone tried the demo with cat 4.10? I am experiencing graphical problems with cat 4.8 when using both [light trails] and [light glow] at the same time. The readme.txt recommends cat 4.9, but if I'm gonna change I'd rather go to 4.10. I'm using the 4.9b's from Omega and it's looking fine. One important tweak I found to improve the IQ is to turn off the stupid ENHANCED CONTAST and even the FOG. Once I turned those off along with light trails and motion blur it started to look more like the 1st NFS:U. I still think the first one is about 20% better looking and I think we can blame the consoles for the drop in IQ. I really liked the replay feature!! I never understood why it was left out of the first one considering the point of the game is to trick out your ride and make it look cool. Over all, it looks like I'll be getting this game when it hits.. but again.. I'm sorry to see a little bit of "consolitis" effect the PC version. Pluvious -------------------------------- thread start: hq wrote: I'm sure many ATI owners will find this initial impression interesting as NFSU was a hot seller on PCs(I upgraded to a 9800 just for NFS) Just downloaded and played for about 2 hours the just released Need for Speed Underground 2 demo...and my initial view is disappointing. On my 3Ghz PC with Radeon 9800(oc'd) card the first thing that got me was the graphics, which look several levels worse than the original!? For a start, with nearly all the settings on max visual quality the city/world looks terrible, nowhere near as detailed or impressive as the first game. The cars look worse than the orginal, apart from a nice NOS flames effect which is pretty cool. But my biggest disappointment of all are the babes in the crowd and especially the ones that start the race- they look like badly drawn playstation 1 characters! Nooooooooooooooooooo! What have they done to them? Shame on you EA. On the plus side, the only new impressive graphical effect is the rainstorm graphics which has to be the most realistic I've yet seen. Pretty cool when a thunderstorm starts up in the middle of a race i gotta say. This demo is too close to the release date of the actual game to expect any drastic improvements so I would expect this is pretty much what the final release will look like. Something fishy altogether about the graphics - like they could have been better but have been simplified to 'fit' in with the console versions. Gameplay seems O.K. and it does have that 'one more go' effect so nothing wrong that. I know graphics are secondary to gameplay but when a game as ground-breaking visually and gameplay wise as NFSU is released, you'd expect the producers to outdo the original by several levels. I was definitely expecting more from this game after the first game used all available hardware so well - something that was stated in the first game's documention. NFSU 1 is one of my fav games of all time, certainly my fav racer of all time so this sequel had something to live up to. So far it hasn't. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
ea demo never represent the final product quality... :-\
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
well... I tried it out with the 4.10's and it appears to work fine. No more
graphical corruption with all the options turned on. Now, with respect to the quality of the demo: 1. I loved the first NFSU. 2. I'm not impressed by NFSU2 - from what I've seen so far. 3. The visual quality of the models is just horrible compared to the first NFSU 4. I'm not really fond of the motion blur. 5. I really don't know; I just had higher expectations I guess. Bah... Where's HL2! "Tony DiMarzio" wrote in message ... Has anyone tried the demo with cat 4.10? I am experiencing graphical problems with cat 4.8 when using both [light trails] and [light glow] at the same time. The readme.txt recommends cat 4.9, but if I'm gonna change I'd rather go to 4.10. -- Tony DiMarzio "hg" wrote in message ... I'm sure many ATI owners will find this initial impression interesting as NFSU was a hot seller on PCs(I upgraded to a 9800 just for NFS) Just downloaded and played for about 2 hours the just released Need for Speed Underground 2 demo...and my initial view is disappointing. On my 3Ghz PC with Radeon 9800(oc'd) card the first thing that got me was the graphics, which look several levels worse than the original!? For a start, with nearly all the settings on max visual quality the city/world looks terrible, nowhere near as detailed or impressive as the first game. The cars look worse than the orginal, apart from a nice NOS flames effect which is pretty cool. But my biggest disappointment of all are the babes in the crowd and especially the ones that start the race- they look like badly drawn playstation 1 characters! Nooooooooooooooooooo! What have they done to them? Shame on you EA. On the plus side, the only new impressive graphical effect is the rainstorm graphics which has to be the most realistic I've yet seen. Pretty cool when a thunderstorm starts up in the middle of a race i gotta say. This demo is too close to the release date of the actual game to expect any drastic improvements so I would expect this is pretty much what the final release will look like. Something fishy altogether about the graphics - like they could have been better but have been simplified to 'fit' in with the console versions. Gameplay seems O.K. and it does have that 'one more go' effect so nothing wrong that. I know graphics are secondary to gameplay but when a game as ground-breaking visually and gameplay wise as NFSU is released, you'd expect the producers to outdo the original by several levels. I was definitely expecting more from this game after the first game used all available hardware so well - something that was stated in the first game's documention. NFSU 1 is one of my fav games of all time, certainly my fav racer of all time so this sequel had something to live up to. So far it hasn't. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FarCry Demo and Prince of Persia Demo | Michael Fritz | Ati Videocards | 7 | October 21st 04 09:28 AM |
Played the Pacific Assault Demo, yeah so what ? | Orbital Defence | Ati Videocards | 19 | September 6th 04 08:18 PM |
Newer CoD demo just out. Cat 3.8's cause probs. 3.7's OK | jdc1 | Ati Videocards | 8 | October 13th 03 12:03 AM |
9600Pro & Dawn Demo problem... | Richard | Ati Videocards | 9 | September 30th 03 01:45 AM |