How much of a speed increase?

Phil Weldon wrote:


You still haven't read my first post, evidently (what do you think "may or
may not ever be called on" means?). How about this, why not explain
something that you do know about? Then judging the value of your comments
might be more fair to you. Also, your 'replies' might be easier to judge if
they were actually on point.

Phil Weldon


I accept your backpedalling and ever-weaker insults as tacit admittance
of your aggressive ignorance on this well understood (by others) subject.

Unless you have come up with the maximum FPS the human eye can see? The
whole computer industry is still waiting for your insights.

'Mr.E Solved!' wrote:
| I accept your backpedalling and ever-weaker insults as tacit admittance
| of your aggressive ignorance on this well understood (by others) subject.
|
| Unless you have come up with the maximum FPS the human eye can see? The
| whole computer industry is still waiting for your insights.
_____

Not only is there a limit to the human eye, but also a limit to monitor
ability to display. And that's about the last I'll try at an explanation
for you. As for insults, I've posted not a one concerning you; judgments
perhaps, but not insults.

Phil Weldon

"Mr.E Solved!" wrote in message
...
| Phil Weldon wrote:
|
|
| You still haven't read my first post, evidently (what do you think "may
or
| may not ever be called on" means?). How about this, why not explain
| something that you do know about? Then judging the value of your
comments
| might be more fair to you. Also, your 'replies' might be easier to
judge if
| they were actually on point.
|
| Phil Weldon
|
|
| I accept your backpedalling and ever-weaker insults as tacit admittance
| of your aggressive ignorance on this well understood (by others) subject.
|
| Unless you have come up with the maximum FPS the human eye can see? The
| whole computer industry is still waiting for your insights.

Phil Weldon wrote:

'Mr.E Solved!' wrote:
| I accept your backpedalling and ever-weaker insults as tacit admittance
| of your aggressive ignorance on this well understood (by others) subject.
|
| Unless you have come up with the maximum FPS the human eye can see? The
| whole computer industry is still waiting for your insights.
_____

Not only is there a limit to the human eye, but also a limit to monitor
ability to display. And that's about the last I'll try at an explanation
for you. As for insults, I've posted not a one concerning you; judgments
perhaps, but not insults.

Phil Weldon

So what's the limit and how do you know what that limit it is? Link please.

If that limit is higher than what any monitor can produce, you will need
an aspirin for that cognitive dissonance headache. Never mind that you
completely, absolutely, totally, 100%, ignored my explanation of a
static image and FPS vs. a moving interactive image. Plus how they all
relate to each other.

Don't worry, I know you read my replies and are too weak to say, "Gee, I
never knew that about FPS, boy I am glad someone took the time to
correct my understanding of this. Golly, how uninformed I must seem to
people who know this topic better than me."

Both you and I know that one of us knows what they are talking about and
tried to educate the other about an important subject...while the other
will finish reading this post and go back to his Dell.