If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dual DVI at *exactly* 1680x1050
Can someone suggest a graphics card that will give me:
Dual DVI resolution that includes exactly 1680x1050 (each) AGP or PCI, don't care for office applications, not gaming or other realistic rendering Windows 2000 Pro SP4 support It seems to me that this should be very undemanding, but I've already found out the hard way that just because the vendor says resolutions "up to some way big number by some other big number", that doesn't automatically mean 1680x1050 is included. I have also found that none of the vendor websites seem to list the supported combinations of resolutions. So, folks, any suggestions? Thanks. Roy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dual DVI at *exactly* 1680x1050
"Roy Hann" wrote in message news Can someone suggest a graphics card that will give me: Dual DVI resolution that includes exactly 1680x1050 (each) AGP or PCI, don't care for office applications, not gaming or other realistic rendering Windows 2000 Pro SP4 support It seems to me that this should be very undemanding, but I've already found out the hard way that just because the vendor says resolutions "up to some way big number by some other big number", that doesn't automatically mean 1680x1050 is included. I have also found that none of the vendor websites seem to list the supported combinations of resolutions. Typically, non-standard resolutions can be generated by a large number of cards. But it's the specific monitor drivers that are the key component in determining this. The generic XP monitor drivers will not do this. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dual DVI at *exactly* 1680x1050
* Roy Hann:
Can someone suggest a graphics card that will give me: Dual DVI resolution that includes exactly 1680x1050 (each) AGP or PCI, don't care for office applications, not gaming or other realistic rendering Windows 2000 Pro SP4 support Every Geforce and Radeon card except some crappy Geforce FX5200/5500 are capable of this... It seems to me that this should be very undemanding, but I've already found out the hard way that just because the vendor says resolutions "up to some way big number by some other big number", that doesn't automatically mean 1680x1050 is included. It *does* exactly mean that. Every gfx card of the last 10 years or so is freely programmable regarding resolutions which means they can display everything up to the max resolution that is listed. The same is valid for every Radeon and Geforce card. There however were some el-cheapo Geforce FX5200 and FX5500 with buggy BIOS that don't support high resolutions over DVI. If you can't get 2x 1680x1050 from your Geforce with two DVI ports then there's something wrong with either your hardware or the software/driver.... I have also found that none of the vendor websites seem to list the supported combinations of resolutions. So, folks, any suggestions? Yes. Just post some details about where you have which problems, maybe we can help you to solve that. Benjamin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dual DVI at *exactly* 1680x1050
"Benjamin Gawert" wrote in message
... * Roy Hann: Can someone suggest a graphics card that will give me: Dual DVI resolution that includes exactly 1680x1050 (each) AGP or PCI, don't care for office applications, not gaming or other realistic rendering Windows 2000 Pro SP4 support Every Geforce and Radeon card except some crappy Geforce FX5200/5500 are capable of this... That sounds promising. It seems to me that this should be very undemanding, but I've already found out the hard way that just because the vendor says resolutions "up to some way big number by some other big number", that doesn't automatically mean 1680x1050 is included. It *does* exactly mean that. I believe my Matrox G550 is less than 10 years old, yet it won't offer me the required resolution. The driver offers me a fixed menu of resolutions that doesn't include what I want. Every gfx card of the last 10 years or so is freely programmable regarding resolutions which means they can display everything up to the max resolution that is listed. If you can suggest how I might persuade the G550 to give me what I want I'd be grateful. Failing that, I'd like to hear from someone who is running a dual head card at exactly 1680x1050 with two monitors (i.e. 3360x1050). Roy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dual DVI at *exactly* 1680x1050
"Roy Hann" wrote in message ... "Benjamin Gawert" wrote in message ... * Roy Hann: Can someone suggest a graphics card that will give me: Dual DVI resolution that includes exactly 1680x1050 (each) AGP or PCI, don't care for office applications, not gaming or other realistic rendering Windows 2000 Pro SP4 support Every Geforce and Radeon card except some crappy Geforce FX5200/5500 are capable of this... That sounds promising. It seems to me that this should be very undemanding, but I've already found out the hard way that just because the vendor says resolutions "up to some way big number by some other big number", that doesn't automatically mean 1680x1050 is included. It *does* exactly mean that. I believe my Matrox G550 is less than 10 years old, yet it won't offer me the required resolution. The driver offers me a fixed menu of resolutions that doesn't include what I want. Every gfx card of the last 10 years or so is freely programmable regarding resolutions which means they can display everything up to the max resolution that is listed. If you can suggest how I might persuade the G550 to give me what I want I'd be grateful. Failing that, I'd like to hear from someone who is running a dual head card at exactly 1680x1050 with two monitors (i.e. 3360x1050). Roy The Matrox G550 will only do 1280X1024 on the DVI conections in digital mode. See link http://www.matrox.com/graphics/en/di...s/g550pcie.php In Analog mode the secondary display is also restricted to 1600X1200 maximum. If you really need 1680X1050 on both DVI connections it looks like a new card is in your future. As said before "Every Geforce and Radeon card except some crappy Geforce FX5200/5500 are capable of this...". Just do not get a "Turbo Cache" version of anything. Kevin |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dual DVI at *exactly* 1680x1050
* Roy Hann:
I believe my Matrox G550 is less than 10 years old, yet it won't offer me the required resolution. Right. This is simply because the G550 has limited DVI ports that can't do more than 1280x1024. But the GPU still is freely programmable and does every resolution that is within it's limits. The driver offers me a fixed menu of resolutions that doesn't include what I want. Be careful: even ATI and Nvidia drivers won't show you 1680x1050 unless the driver recognizes a display that supports 1680x1050. The G550 should do this resolution just fine - but only via analog (VGA) because their limited DVI ports. Every gfx card of the last 10 years or so is freely programmable regarding resolutions which means they can display everything up to the max resolution that is listed. If you can suggest how I might persuade the G550 to give me what I want I'd be grateful. Over DVI? No way. Failing that, I'd like to hear from someone who is running a dual head card at exactly 1680x1050 with two monitors (i.e. 3360x1050). As I said get a Radeon or Geforce card with two DVI ports and you're set. Unlike with Matrox this is not a problem with ATI and Nvidia cards... Benjamin, who ran two Dell 2005FPWs with 1680x1050 for some time |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Dual DVI at *exactly* 1680x1050
"Benjamin Gawert" wrote in message
... [snip] As I said get a Radeon or Geforce card with two DVI ports and you're set. Unlike with Matrox this is not a problem with ATI and Nvidia cards... Benjamin, who ran two Dell 2005FPWs with 1680x1050 for some time Many thanks Benjamin. Roy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dual processors vs dual cores? | jbclem | Homebuilt PC's | 4 | November 4th 06 01:42 PM |
Newbie questions - Athlon 64 4800 Dual Core? | comcast | AMD x86-64 Processors | 9 | December 6th 05 08:27 PM |
"Pentium 4" brandname ready to be dropped | Yousuf Khan | General | 69 | November 5th 04 12:51 AM |
single channel versus dual channel memory setup | John Doe | Homebuilt PC's | 5 | October 15th 04 10:31 AM |
Dual Xeons 3.0 vs. dual Opterons 246 for high end 3d graphics? | Luke Piasecki | Intel | 10 | August 18th 04 02:25 AM |