A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Video Cards » Nvidia Videocards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OT?: Best Disk Defrag Software



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 21st 04, 08:45 PM
bigmike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT?: Best Disk Defrag Software

Hi,

I have Diskeeper and Norton Systemworks 2003 on my PC. I am using XP Pro.
If I defrag with Diskeeper (which will tell me drive is done) and then use
Norton Speedisk, Norton will run for a long while before it says the drive
is defragmented. If I run Norton first and then use Diskeeper, Diskeeper
will only run a short while and then say the drive is done. Which one do
you guys think does a more thorough job because mine are both trial versions
and I have to pay for one sooner or later. Does Norton do a better job or
just take a lot longer than Diskeeper to do the same thing?

Mike


  #2  
Old January 21st 04, 09:11 PM
Bob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I like Perfect Disk 6.0...seems to be more thorough and it's what a lot of
the MS MVP's have been recommending . You can get a 30 day trial at:
http://www.raxco.com/
They claim that it does in one pass what Diskeeper takes to do over a period
of time. I've had excellent results with it and purchased a copy.
HTH,
Bob
"bigmike" wrote in message
. net...
Hi,

I have Diskeeper and Norton Systemworks 2003 on my PC. I am using XP Pro.
If I defrag with Diskeeper (which will tell me drive is done) and then use
Norton Speedisk, Norton will run for a long while before it says the

drive
is defragmented. If I run Norton first and then use Diskeeper, Diskeeper
will only run a short while and then say the drive is done. Which one do
you guys think does a more thorough job because mine are both trial

versions
and I have to pay for one sooner or later. Does Norton do a better job or
just take a lot longer than Diskeeper to do the same thing?

Mike




  #3  
Old January 21st 04, 09:15 PM
Patch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"bigmike" wrote in message
. net...
Hi,

I have Diskeeper and Norton Systemworks 2003 on my PC. I am using XP Pro.
If I defrag with Diskeeper (which will tell me drive is done) and then use
Norton Speedisk, Norton will run for a long while before it says the

drive
is defragmented. If I run Norton first and then use Diskeeper, Diskeeper
will only run a short while and then say the drive is done. Which one do
you guys think does a more thorough job because mine are both trial

versions
and I have to pay for one sooner or later. Does Norton do a better job or
just take a lot longer than Diskeeper to do the same thing?

Mike


Diskeeper is a keeper!


  #4  
Old January 21st 04, 11:58 PM
BelaLvgosi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Patch" wrote in message
news[email protected]

"bigmike" wrote in message
. net...
Hi,

I have Diskeeper and Norton Systemworks 2003 on my PC. I am using XP

Pro.
If I defrag with Diskeeper (which will tell me drive is done) and then

use
Norton Speedisk, Norton will run for a long while before it says the

drive
is defragmented. If I run Norton first and then use Diskeeper,

Diskeeper
will only run a short while and then say the drive is done. Which one

do
you guys think does a more thorough job because mine are both trial

versions
and I have to pay for one sooner or later. Does Norton do a better job

or
just take a lot longer than Diskeeper to do the same thing?

Mike


Diskeeper is a keeper!



PerfectDisk, as it optimizes swap file position (putting it in the middle of
the disk) unlike Diskeeper that only defrags it and throws it in the first
available space it sees.


  #5  
Old January 22nd 04, 02:51 PM
Darkfalz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

PerfectDisk, as it optimizes swap file position (putting it in the middle
of
the disk) unlike Diskeeper that only defrags it and throws it in the first
available space it sees.


Optimal is putting it at the START of the disc, where the disc is fastest.


  #6  
Old January 23rd 04, 10:43 PM
~misfit~
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Patch wrote:
"bigmike" wrote in message
. net...
Hi,

I have Diskeeper and Norton Systemworks 2003 on my PC. I am using
XP Pro. If I defrag with Diskeeper (which will tell me drive is
done) and then use Norton Speedisk, Norton will run for a long
while before it says the drive is defragmented. If I run Norton
first and then use Diskeeper, Diskeeper will only run a short while
and then say the drive is done. Which one do you guys think does a
more thorough job because mine are both trial versions and I have to
pay for one sooner or later. Does Norton do a better job or just
take a lot longer than Diskeeper to do the same thing?

Mike


Diskeeper is a keeper!


Gotta agree there. I've tried both Diskeeper and Speedisk extensively and
noticed no discernable difference in performance after using either. In fact
Speedisk actually destroyed a couple of my older HDDs (8-10GB), I used it
frequently and it thrashes the **** out of the disk, causing waaaay more
wear'n'tear than the disk would see during normal use. After a while I ended
up with bad sectors all over the place, something which didn't happen with
identical HDDs I didn't use Speedisk with.

JME.

I no longer install Norton Systemworks '03 on my machines.
--
~misfit~


  #7  
Old January 22nd 04, 11:39 PM
Asestar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I used SystemMechanic 4. It was on trial, but i think It did a very good
job. It has 2 modes, 1 fast, and 1 optimal. Optimal one puts data on start
of disk, if i remember.


"bigmike" wrote in message
. net...
Hi,

I have Diskeeper and Norton Systemworks 2003 on my PC. I am using XP Pro.
If I defrag with Diskeeper (which will tell me drive is done) and then use
Norton Speedisk, Norton will run for a long while before it says the

drive
is defragmented. If I run Norton first and then use Diskeeper, Diskeeper
will only run a short while and then say the drive is done. Which one do
you guys think does a more thorough job because mine are both trial

versions
and I have to pay for one sooner or later. Does Norton do a better job or
just take a lot longer than Diskeeper to do the same thing?

Mike




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Invalid system disk seabat Homebuilt PC's 23 November 21st 04 03:03 AM
Can I use a 160 GB hard disk on a Gigabyte Titan 8IEXP with Win98SE? Peltio Gigabyte Motherboards 8 October 4th 04 05:02 PM
My system seems to "recover" with great frequency Louise Homebuilt PC's 3 May 17th 04 06:02 AM
Some P4C800-E Deluxe Q's and upgrade advice requested please Paul Asus Motherboards 6 April 13th 04 08:46 PM
Info Peripherals Scanner Model FB735 & Software CD HBYardSale Scanners 0 August 18th 03 03:29 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.