If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Arthur Entlich wrote: The difference is yours IS an opinion, and mine is factual data. That is what all of the evangelists always say. The difference is you toss around your opinion as if it was fact, and I state facts. That is what all of the evangelists always say. The difference is you libel companies, and you do so continually, regardless of how may times you have been brought to task about it. I make criticisms based upon knowledgeable constructs, and if I am shown to be incorrect, I retract or withdraw incorrect information. That is what all of the evangelists always say. You provide misleading information, either due to ignorance, or maliciousness, I provide helpful and accurate information with the intent to advance the welfare of the person who asks for information. That is what all of the evangelists always say. I am still waiting for something beyond your outbursts to explain your excuse for your libelous comments on this newsgroup That is what all of the evangelists always say. . Your outbursts certainly seem to be "timed" to whenever anyone asks you to defend you statements. That's a tactic I expect from a 4 year old, not a Stanford grad. Which one are you really? Art AMEN measekite wrote: Arthur Entlich wrote: Actually Jon, the quote you provide below is from me (as the attribution states). I am indicating that Measkite is indeed providing false statements about the advantages of OEM inks over many 3rd party inks, and as such, he is a "shill" for OEM inks. He has also libeled a number of 3rd party ink vendors, and up until now has been unwilling to state for the record what his claim of unprofessionalism on the part of at least one of them is based upon. Art Bull****! Your opinion is no more correct than mine. I really do not give a **** about your tinkering crap. You want to do it; thats fine. Different strokes for different folks. Jon O'Brien wrote: In article aAZke.1479309$8l.752187@pd7tw1no, (Arthur Entlich) wrote: Well, considering that you are a shill for OEM inks, since you lobby for them and lie to do so, and that you have put yourself at risk of some lawsuits by libeling a number of 3rd party ink vendors... As you have probably just done by accusing Arthur of lying. At the very least, you've defamed (or 'traduced', since it seems to be the word of the moment) his character. You've really gone over the top this time. If you have proof that Arthur has lied here, I suggest that you either produce it or shut up. Jon. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
I can well imagine humidiity etc will, obviously I aint got it near a
radiator and we don't grow icicles. Batch problem, well Art said that all I can say is I got one printer from one place (in the original Epson box), but the replacement cam in a plain ol' brown box, minus carts with Epson security stickers, someone suggested may have been a referb. unit, sure did look brand new. Having that said, the reason I got a C62 is I know someone who had a C60, thats still going strong and with third party inks, we can all accept the occassional head clean. As you say; in my case they clogged with both inks which points the finger at something else. Briefly-; during the cleaniing cycle the ink purges into the inkwell, if the level is high enough it's gonna 'ink' the heads, with 'mixed' ink which MAY become thicker, this gets on to the heads, and as you know the heads brush against rubber cleaning blades wiping and pushing ink off and at the same time pushing it into the nozzles...just theory I have. But I aint gonna buy an Epson to find out. I'll check the manuals to see whats different between the heads and docking units between the C and CX series. Davy |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Burt wrote:
When logic and facts fail him he responds with infantile, obscene, innane comments. They wouldn't let this guy into Stanford to clean their toilets. Yeah he's a real moron. He definitely has psychotic responses whenever he's cornered. Kinda like a rat. Frank |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Frank wrote: Burt wrote: When logic and facts fail him he responds with infantile, obscene, innane comments. They wouldn't let this guy into Stanford to clean their toilets. Yeah he's a real moron. He definitely has psychotic responses whenever he's cornered. Kinda like a rat. Ball Park Frank |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
You keep on referring to ink building up in the cleaning station, but
the design doesn't allow that to happen the way you imply. The same purge pump that creates the vacuum to apply to the heads to remove the ink from the head nozzles is also the one that provides the vacuum to suck the ink out of the cleaning station. The process occurs together. If the purge pump isn't working or the connection fails (the tube dislodges) then it doesn't create any vacuum and no ink comes out of the head, so even though there ink could be then potentially stuck to drian by gravity assistance only, there is no ink because the cleaning cycle requires the vacuum which the is applied through that same tube. Art Davy wrote: I can well imagine humidiity etc will, obviously I aint got it near a radiator and we don't grow icicles. Batch problem, well Art said that all I can say is I got one printer from one place (in the original Epson box), but the replacement cam in a plain ol' brown box, minus carts with Epson security stickers, someone suggested may have been a referb. unit, sure did look brand new. Having that said, the reason I got a C62 is I know someone who had a C60, thats still going strong and with third party inks, we can all accept the occassional head clean. As you say; in my case they clogged with both inks which points the finger at something else. Briefly-; during the cleaniing cycle the ink purges into the inkwell, if the level is high enough it's gonna 'ink' the heads, with 'mixed' ink which MAY become thicker, this gets on to the heads, and as you know the heads brush against rubber cleaning blades wiping and pushing ink off and at the same time pushing it into the nozzles...just theory I have. But I aint gonna buy an Epson to find out. I'll check the manuals to see whats different between the heads and docking units between the C and CX series. Davy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please make it STOP! HP7110 all-in-one | Petey the Wonder Dog | Printers | 1 | April 5th 05 06:59 PM |
Fan wont stop in Stand by mode! | rom1l | General | 8 | March 22nd 05 08:04 PM |
Getting blue screen stop errors when attempting to backup >10Gb partitions | Ian Roberts | Storage (alternative) | 1 | March 22nd 05 02:37 AM |
Stop 0x000000B8 Error with GA-8KNXP | John © | Gigabyte Motherboards | 2 | September 26th 03 09:39 PM |