If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Flash Presentation Problem on My GW 700x
My 2GHz 7-year old Gateway 700x desktop running Win XP Pro and a fairly
good Nvidia GeoForce 2 MX400 video card has no problem playing web videos. However, when I go to this link to play a Flash presentation... http://www.thecosmeticconspiracy.com/green ....the sound and video are very choppy. When I minimize this Firefox 2.0 webpage to the taskbar, the sound is very smooth. What is the likely problem here? Thanks! Scott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Flash Presentation Problem on My GW 700x
In ,
Scott typed on Mon, 04 May 2009 23:59:08 -0500: My 2GHz 7-year old Gateway 700x desktop running Win XP Pro and a fairly good Nvidia GeoForce 2 MX400 video card has no problem playing web videos. However, when I go to this link to play a Flash presentation... http://www.thecosmeticconspiracy.com/green ...the sound and video are very choppy. When I minimize this Firefox 2.0 webpage to the taskbar, the sound is very smooth. What is the likely problem here? Thanks! Scott Hi Scott! That site won't even let me in. As it wants me to upgrade my IE6 (it is really Maxthon) browser first. http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/468...0505063209.gif -- Bill Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Flash Presentation Problem on My GW 700x
Scott wrote:
My 2GHz 7-year old Gateway 700x desktop running Win XP Pro and a fairly good Nvidia GeoForce 2 MX400 video card has no problem playing web videos. However, when I go to this link to play a Flash presentation... http://www.thecosmeticconspiracy.com/green ...the sound and video are very choppy. When I minimize this Firefox 2.0 webpage to the taskbar, the sound is very smooth. What is the likely problem here? Thanks! Scott Scott, You yourself have hinted at the cause of the problem. The system does not have enough horsepower between graphics and CPU to push all the bits needed onto the screen. Audio playback requires very little processing power compared to all those bits being rapidly shoveled out onto the screen by Flash. Most likely an upgrade to a newer graphics card with more on-board memory would be cost-effective. You might also look at the amount of memory in the system itself. A CPU upgrade would not do all that much to increase the power of the system. I'll guess that the CPU is around 1.8 to 2.0 GHz. I'd have to check the specs on the motherboard, but it may be limited to Socket 478 CPUs with 400MHz front-side bus. If so, then the fastest would either be 2.4GHz Pentium 4 (scarce and expensive) or a 2.8Ghz Celeron (cheap, but smaller cache memory than a P4). These would not provide enough bang for the buck to be worth the time and effort to install... Ben Myers |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Flash Presentation Problem on My GW 700x
In ,
Ben Myers typed on Tue, 05 May 2009 11:02:06 -0400: Scott wrote: My 2GHz 7-year old Gateway 700x desktop running Win XP Pro and a fairly good Nvidia GeoForce 2 MX400 video card has no problem playing web videos. However, when I go to this link to play a Flash presentation... http://www.thecosmeticconspiracy.com/green ...the sound and video are very choppy. When I minimize this Firefox 2.0 webpage to the taskbar, the sound is very smooth. What is the likely problem here? Thanks! Scott Scott, You yourself have hinted at the cause of the problem. The system does not have enough horsepower between graphics and CPU to push all the bits needed onto the screen. Audio playback requires very little processing power compared to all those bits being rapidly shoveled out onto the screen by Flash. Most likely an upgrade to a newer graphics card with more on-board memory would be cost-effective. You might also look at the amount of memory in the system itself. A CPU upgrade would not do all that much to increase the power of the system. I'll guess that the CPU is around 1.8 to 2.0 GHz. I'd have to check the specs on the motherboard, but it may be limited to Socket 478 CPUs with 400MHz front-side bus. If so, then the fastest would either be 2.4GHz Pentium 4 (scarce and expensive) or a 2.8Ghz Celeron (cheap, but smaller cache memory than a P4). These would not provide enough bang for the buck to be worth the time and effort to install... Ben Myers Hi Scott, well I disagree with Ben. I use Celerons all of the time with very cheap video cards (integrated with shared memory) and a 600MHz Celeron or faster should play videos just fine. This netbook for example has a 900Mhz Celeron under clocked to 633MHz and it plays videos just fine. I can clock it up if I need too, but I rarely need too. During a recent test to help someone on another newsgroup. I found the worst part of playing a video through a browser is that Adobe Flash Player is a huge CPU hog! For example, playing a 700kbps 640x400 video on this netbook eats up about 90% of the CPU with Adobe Flash Player. Although using any other player with the codec installed (like WMP or Media Player Classic) the CPU drops down to 20% with the same video. I also tried different browsers like IE6 and Firefox 3 and the results were the same with Adobe Flash Player plug in. So the browser doesn't change this at all. And everything points to Adobe Flash Player as being a gross CPU hog. Nonetheless, your computer still should play the video even with Adobe Flash Player without any hardware upgrades. If my Toshiba 2595XDVD with a 400MHz Celeron ('99 era) with 2.5MB of video RAM and with 192MB of RAM can, so can yours. Although I am sure I have an older Adobe Flash Player version installed on it. grin -- Bill Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Flash Presentation Problem on My GW 700x
BillW50 wrote:
In , Ben Myers typed on Tue, 05 May 2009 11:02:06 -0400: Scott wrote: My 2GHz 7-year old Gateway 700x desktop running Win XP Pro and a fairly good Nvidia GeoForce 2 MX400 video card has no problem playing web videos. However, when I go to this link to play a Flash presentation... http://www.thecosmeticconspiracy.com/green ...the sound and video are very choppy. When I minimize this Firefox 2.0 webpage to the taskbar, the sound is very smooth. What is the likely problem here? Thanks! Scott Scott, You yourself have hinted at the cause of the problem. The system does not have enough horsepower between graphics and CPU to push all the bits needed onto the screen. Audio playback requires very little processing power compared to all those bits being rapidly shoveled out onto the screen by Flash. Most likely an upgrade to a newer graphics card with more on-board memory would be cost-effective. You might also look at the amount of memory in the system itself. A CPU upgrade would not do all that much to increase the power of the system. I'll guess that the CPU is around 1.8 to 2.0 GHz. I'd have to check the specs on the motherboard, but it may be limited to Socket 478 CPUs with 400MHz front-side bus. If so, then the fastest would either be 2.4GHz Pentium 4 (scarce and expensive) or a 2.8Ghz Celeron (cheap, but smaller cache memory than a P4). These would not provide enough bang for the buck to be worth the time and effort to install... Ben Myers Hi Scott, well I disagree with Ben. I use Celerons all of the time with very cheap video cards (integrated with shared memory) and a 600MHz Celeron or faster should play videos just fine. This netbook for example has a 900Mhz Celeron under clocked to 633MHz and it plays videos just fine. I can clock it up if I need too, but I rarely need too. During a recent test to help someone on another newsgroup. I found the worst part of playing a video through a browser is that Adobe Flash Player is a huge CPU hog! For example, playing a 700kbps 640x400 video on this netbook eats up about 90% of the CPU with Adobe Flash Player. Although using any other player with the codec installed (like WMP or Media Player Classic) the CPU drops down to 20% with the same video. I also tried different browsers like IE6 and Firefox 3 and the results were the same with Adobe Flash Player plug in. So the browser doesn't change this at all. And everything points to Adobe Flash Player as being a gross CPU hog. Nonetheless, your computer still should play the video even with Adobe Flash Player without any hardware upgrades. If my Toshiba 2595XDVD with a 400MHz Celeron ('99 era) with 2.5MB of video RAM and with 192MB of RAM can, so can yours. Although I am sure I have an older Adobe Flash Player version installed on it. grin BillW50, Give it a rest. I NEVER made any value judgement about Celeron CPUs. Just the facts, m'am. The actual and accurate facts, even. "cheap, but smaller cache memory than a P4." How can a rational being possibly disagree with the facts? Fact is that a jump from the presumed 1.8GHz P4 CPU to a 2.8GHz Celeron (if one can be found inexpensively) will provide SOME improvement. The faster Celeron clock speed is slightly cancelled out by its smaller cache. How much improvement? I dunno. Some. Worth it? Maybe. Will the motherboard BIOS support a 2.8GHz Celeron? Maybe, but pretty likely. I suppose if the OP has time on his hands and a few bucks to spend, it is worth upgrading the 700x only with a pretty modest investment. But the result could be underwhelming. Or phenomenal. .... Ben Myers |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Flash Presentation Problem on My GW 700x
In ,
Scott typed on Mon, 04 May 2009 23:59:08 -0500: My 2GHz 7-year old Gateway 700x desktop running Win XP Pro and a fairly good Nvidia GeoForce 2 MX400 video card has no problem playing web videos. However, when I go to this link to play a Flash presentation... http://www.thecosmeticconspiracy.com/green ...the sound and video are very choppy. When I minimize this Firefox 2.0 webpage to the taskbar, the sound is very smooth. What is the likely problem here? Thanks! Scott Hi Scott! Well I tried Firefox 3 Portable on my netbook and the website pops up ok. But the video won't download. I tried it on my Gateway MX6124 1.5GHz ('06 era) and it plays fine. Using Firefox it was pushing 50% of the CPU time. The file can be found in your temp folder. You probably need the free Unlocker to make a copy of it if you want to play it outside of the browser (plays fine on the Gateway and this netbook). Here is the info about the video. Maybe it will help. General Complete name : D:\Videos\The Cosmetic Conspiracy.flv Format : Flash Video File size : 79.0 MiB Duration : 17mn 43s Overall bit rate : 623 Kbps Video Format : VP6 Duration : 17mn 43s Bit rate : 500 Kbps Width : 720 pixels Height : 405 pixels Display aspect ratio : 16/9 Frame rate : 23.976 fps Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.072 Audio Format : MPEG Audio Format version : Version 1 Format profile : Layer 3 Duration : 17mn 43s Bit rate mode : Constant Bit rate : 80.0 Kbps Channel(s) : 2 channels Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz Resolution : 16 bits -- Bill Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Flash Presentation Problem on My GW 700x
In ,
Ben Myers typed on Tue, 05 May 2009 15:08:51 -0400: BillW50 wrote: In , Ben Myers typed on Tue, 05 May 2009 11:02:06 -0400: Scott wrote: My 2GHz 7-year old Gateway 700x desktop running Win XP Pro and a fairly good Nvidia GeoForce 2 MX400 video card has no problem playing web videos. However, when I go to this link to play a Flash presentation... http://www.thecosmeticconspiracy.com/green ...the sound and video are very choppy. When I minimize this Firefox 2.0 webpage to the taskbar, the sound is very smooth. What is the likely problem here? Thanks! Scott Scott, You yourself have hinted at the cause of the problem. The system does not have enough horsepower between graphics and CPU to push all the bits needed onto the screen. Audio playback requires very little processing power compared to all those bits being rapidly shoveled out onto the screen by Flash. Most likely an upgrade to a newer graphics card with more on-board memory would be cost-effective. You might also look at the amount of memory in the system itself. A CPU upgrade would not do all that much to increase the power of the system. I'll guess that the CPU is around 1.8 to 2.0 GHz. I'd have to check the specs on the motherboard, but it may be limited to Socket 478 CPUs with 400MHz front-side bus. If so, then the fastest would either be 2.4GHz Pentium 4 (scarce and expensive) or a 2.8Ghz Celeron (cheap, but smaller cache memory than a P4). These would not provide enough bang for the buck to be worth the time and effort to install... Ben Myers Hi Scott, well I disagree with Ben. I use Celerons all of the time with very cheap video cards (integrated with shared memory) and a 600MHz Celeron or faster should play videos just fine. This netbook for example has a 900Mhz Celeron under clocked to 633MHz and it plays videos just fine. I can clock it up if I need too, but I rarely need too. During a recent test to help someone on another newsgroup. I found the worst part of playing a video through a browser is that Adobe Flash Player is a huge CPU hog! For example, playing a 700kbps 640x400 video on this netbook eats up about 90% of the CPU with Adobe Flash Player. Although using any other player with the codec installed (like WMP or Media Player Classic) the CPU drops down to 20% with the same video. I also tried different browsers like IE6 and Firefox 3 and the results were the same with Adobe Flash Player plug in. So the browser doesn't change this at all. And everything points to Adobe Flash Player as being a gross CPU hog. Nonetheless, your computer still should play the video even with Adobe Flash Player without any hardware upgrades. If my Toshiba 2595XDVD with a 400MHz Celeron ('99 era) with 2.5MB of video RAM and with 192MB of RAM can, so can yours. Although I am sure I have an older Adobe Flash Player version installed on it. grin BillW50, Give it a rest. I NEVER made any value judgement about Celeron CPUs. Just the facts, m'am. The actual and accurate facts, even. "cheap, but smaller cache memory than a P4." How can a rational being possibly disagree with the facts? Fact is that a jump from the presumed 1.8GHz P4 CPU to a 2.8GHz Celeron (if one can be found inexpensively) will provide SOME improvement. The faster Celeron clock speed is slightly cancelled out by its smaller cache. How much improvement? I dunno. Some. Worth it? Maybe. Will the motherboard BIOS support a 2.8GHz Celeron? Maybe, but pretty likely. I suppose if the OP has time on his hands and a few bucks to spend, it is worth upgrading the 700x only with a pretty modest investment. But the result could be underwhelming. Or phenomenal. ... Ben Myers Well I must say you are indeed a character Ben. grin But I stand by my statement that it isn't Scott's hardware, but something else. I just tried my Celeron 1.5GHz under Firefox 3 and it played fine at 50% CPU use. -- Bill Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Flash Presentation Problem on My GW 700x
BillW50 wrote:
In , Ben Myers typed on Tue, 05 May 2009 15:08:51 -0400: BillW50 wrote: In , Ben Myers typed on Tue, 05 May 2009 11:02:06 -0400: Scott wrote: My 2GHz 7-year old Gateway 700x desktop running Win XP Pro and a fairly good Nvidia GeoForce 2 MX400 video card has no problem playing web videos. However, when I go to this link to play a Flash presentation... http://www.thecosmeticconspiracy.com/green ...the sound and video are very choppy. When I minimize this Firefox 2.0 webpage to the taskbar, the sound is very smooth. What is the likely problem here? Thanks! Scott Scott, You yourself have hinted at the cause of the problem. The system does not have enough horsepower between graphics and CPU to push all the bits needed onto the screen. Audio playback requires very little processing power compared to all those bits being rapidly shoveled out onto the screen by Flash. Most likely an upgrade to a newer graphics card with more on-board memory would be cost-effective. You might also look at the amount of memory in the system itself. A CPU upgrade would not do all that much to increase the power of the system. I'll guess that the CPU is around 1.8 to 2.0 GHz. I'd have to check the specs on the motherboard, but it may be limited to Socket 478 CPUs with 400MHz front-side bus. If so, then the fastest would either be 2.4GHz Pentium 4 (scarce and expensive) or a 2.8Ghz Celeron (cheap, but smaller cache memory than a P4). These would not provide enough bang for the buck to be worth the time and effort to install... Ben Myers Hi Scott, well I disagree with Ben. I use Celerons all of the time with very cheap video cards (integrated with shared memory) and a 600MHz Celeron or faster should play videos just fine. This netbook for example has a 900Mhz Celeron under clocked to 633MHz and it plays videos just fine. I can clock it up if I need too, but I rarely need too. During a recent test to help someone on another newsgroup. I found the worst part of playing a video through a browser is that Adobe Flash Player is a huge CPU hog! For example, playing a 700kbps 640x400 video on this netbook eats up about 90% of the CPU with Adobe Flash Player. Although using any other player with the codec installed (like WMP or Media Player Classic) the CPU drops down to 20% with the same video. I also tried different browsers like IE6 and Firefox 3 and the results were the same with Adobe Flash Player plug in. So the browser doesn't change this at all. And everything points to Adobe Flash Player as being a gross CPU hog. Nonetheless, your computer still should play the video even with Adobe Flash Player without any hardware upgrades. If my Toshiba 2595XDVD with a 400MHz Celeron ('99 era) with 2.5MB of video RAM and with 192MB of RAM can, so can yours. Although I am sure I have an older Adobe Flash Player version installed on it. grin BillW50, Give it a rest. I NEVER made any value judgement about Celeron CPUs. Just the facts, m'am. The actual and accurate facts, even. "cheap, but smaller cache memory than a P4." How can a rational being possibly disagree with the facts? Fact is that a jump from the presumed 1.8GHz P4 CPU to a 2.8GHz Celeron (if one can be found inexpensively) will provide SOME improvement. The faster Celeron clock speed is slightly cancelled out by its smaller cache. How much improvement? I dunno. Some. Worth it? Maybe. Will the motherboard BIOS support a 2.8GHz Celeron? Maybe, but pretty likely. I suppose if the OP has time on his hands and a few bucks to spend, it is worth upgrading the 700x only with a pretty modest investment. But the result could be underwhelming. Or phenomenal. ... Ben Myers Well I must say you are indeed a character Ben. grin But I stand by my statement that it isn't Scott's hardware, but something else. I just tried my Celeron 1.5GHz under Firefox 3 and it played fine at 50% CPU use. "something else", which is? I react to your statements because they are so damned vague. Same as your original statement that you disagreed with me. Did you bother to say why? No. For a self-proclaimed member of Mensa or whatever, you leave behind statements that exhibit a lack of critical thinking... Ben |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Flash Presentation Problem on My GW 700x
In ,
Ben Myers typed on Tue, 05 May 2009 22:44:37 -0400: BillW50 wrote: In , Ben Myers typed on Tue, 05 May 2009 15:08:51 -0400: BillW50 wrote: In , Ben Myers typed on Tue, 05 May 2009 11:02:06 -0400: Scott wrote: My 2GHz 7-year old Gateway 700x desktop running Win XP Pro and a fairly good Nvidia GeoForce 2 MX400 video card has no problem playing web videos. However, when I go to this link to play a Flash presentation... http://www.thecosmeticconspiracy.com/green ...the sound and video are very choppy. When I minimize this Firefox 2.0 webpage to the taskbar, the sound is very smooth. What is the likely problem here? Thanks! Scott Scott, You yourself have hinted at the cause of the problem. The system does not have enough horsepower between graphics and CPU to push all the bits needed onto the screen. Audio playback requires very little processing power compared to all those bits being rapidly shoveled out onto the screen by Flash. Most likely an upgrade to a newer graphics card with more on-board memory would be cost-effective. You might also look at the amount of memory in the system itself. A CPU upgrade would not do all that much to increase the power of the system. I'll guess that the CPU is around 1.8 to 2.0 GHz. I'd have to check the specs on the motherboard, but it may be limited to Socket 478 CPUs with 400MHz front-side bus. If so, then the fastest would either be 2.4GHz Pentium 4 (scarce and expensive) or a 2.8Ghz Celeron (cheap, but smaller cache memory than a P4). These would not provide enough bang for the buck to be worth the time and effort to install... Ben Myers Hi Scott, well I disagree with Ben. I use Celerons all of the time with very cheap video cards (integrated with shared memory) and a 600MHz Celeron or faster should play videos just fine. This netbook for example has a 900Mhz Celeron under clocked to 633MHz and it plays videos just fine. I can clock it up if I need too, but I rarely need too. During a recent test to help someone on another newsgroup. I found the worst part of playing a video through a browser is that Adobe Flash Player is a huge CPU hog! For example, playing a 700kbps 640x400 video on this netbook eats up about 90% of the CPU with Adobe Flash Player. Although using any other player with the codec installed (like WMP or Media Player Classic) the CPU drops down to 20% with the same video. I also tried different browsers like IE6 and Firefox 3 and the results were the same with Adobe Flash Player plug in. So the browser doesn't change this at all. And everything points to Adobe Flash Player as being a gross CPU hog. Nonetheless, your computer still should play the video even with Adobe Flash Player without any hardware upgrades. If my Toshiba 2595XDVD with a 400MHz Celeron ('99 era) with 2.5MB of video RAM and with 192MB of RAM can, so can yours. Although I am sure I have an older Adobe Flash Player version installed on it. grin BillW50, Give it a rest. I NEVER made any value judgement about Celeron CPUs. Just the facts, m'am. The actual and accurate facts, even. "cheap, but smaller cache memory than a P4." How can a rational being possibly disagree with the facts? Fact is that a jump from the presumed 1.8GHz P4 CPU to a 2.8GHz Celeron (if one can be found inexpensively) will provide SOME improvement. The faster Celeron clock speed is slightly cancelled out by its smaller cache. How much improvement? I dunno. Some. Worth it? Maybe. Will the motherboard BIOS support a 2.8GHz Celeron? Maybe, but pretty likely. I suppose if the OP has time on his hands and a few bucks to spend, it is worth upgrading the 700x only with a pretty modest investment. But the result could be underwhelming. Or phenomenal. ... Ben Myers Well I must say you are indeed a character Ben. grin But I stand by my statement that it isn't Scott's hardware, but something else. I just tried my Celeron 1.5GHz under Firefox 3 and it played fine at 50% CPU use. "something else", which is? I react to your statements because they are so damned vague. Same as your original statement that you disagreed with me. Did you bother to say why? No. For a self-proclaimed member of Mensa or whatever, you leave behind statements that exhibit a lack of critical thinking... Ben Self-proclaimed member of Mensa? Vague? Critical thinking? Nonsense! There is nothing wrong with Scott's 2.8-GHz Pentium 4 processor. It clearly has enough horsepower to play this video. This something else? I already alluded too it. Adobe Flash Player 10 for one eats up 2½ times more processing power than other players for one. Since it can't be Scott's hardware lacking power enough to play the video. And I already proved it by playing the file on this netbook, which has far less CPU power and video capabilities than Scott's computer. It played using 50% of the CPU power (Celeron 900MHz running at 633MHz). So if it isn't the hardware being underpowered, what can it be? Well think Ben! Either the CPU is too busy doing something else from some background task (software problem). Or Scott's Internet bandwidth can't keep up. Which seems very unlikely from everything else I have heard so far. I can't think of anything else it could be. You on the other hand, keep insisting that Scott's hardware isn't fast enough to handle this video. That is pure nonsense. As my old Toshiba 2595XDVD ('99) Celeron 400MHz should be able to just barely be able to play this video. And it only has 2.5MB of video RAM. This is the trip point IMHO of not having or having enough power to play it. -- Bill Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Flash Presentation Problem on My GW 700x
BillW50 wrote: In , Scott typed on Mon, 04 May 2009 23:59:08 -0500: My 2GHz 7-year old Gateway 700x desktop running Win XP Pro and a fairly good Nvidia GeoForce 2 MX400 video card has no problem playing web videos. However, when I go to this link to play a Flash presentation... http://www.thecosmeticconspiracy.com/green ...the sound and video are very choppy. When I minimize this Firefox 2.0 webpage to the taskbar, the sound is very smooth. What is the likely problem here? Thanks! Scott Hi Scott! Well I tried Firefox 3 Portable on my netbook and the website pops up ok. But the video won't download. I tried it on my Gateway MX6124 1.5GHz ('06 era) and it plays fine. Using Firefox it was pushing 50% of the CPU time. The file can be found in your temp folder. You probably need the free Unlocker to make a copy of it if you want to play it outside of the browser (plays fine on the Gateway and this netbook). Here is the info about the video. Maybe it will help. General Complete name : D:\Videos\The Cosmetic Conspiracy.flv Format : Flash Video File size : 79.0 MiB Duration : 17mn 43s Overall bit rate : 623 Kbps Video Format : VP6 Duration : 17mn 43s Bit rate : 500 Kbps Width : 720 pixels Height : 405 pixels Display aspect ratio : 16/9 Frame rate : 23.976 fps Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.072 Audio Format : MPEG Audio Format version : Version 1 Format profile : Layer 3 Duration : 17mn 43s Bit rate mode : Constant Bit rate : 80.0 Kbps Channel(s) : 2 channels Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz Resolution : 16 bits -- Bill Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 For whatever reason, the flash presentation plays okay no...using Firefox 2.0 When it's playing, it's using 50-50% of the CPU time. There must have been something running in the background for awhile, but it's no longer a problem. Thanks for your help! Scott |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
upgraded Unreal Engine 3 presentation @ GDC | AirRaid[_2_] | Ati Videocards | 20 | February 26th 08 10:52 AM |
Intel presentation reveals the future of the CPU-GPU war | AirRaid | AMD x86-64 Processors | 1 | April 11th 07 07:59 PM |
Intel presentation reveals the future of the CPU-GPU war | AirRaid | Nvidia Videocards | 1 | April 11th 07 07:59 PM |
Intel presentation reveals the future of the CPU-GPU war | AirRaid | Ati Videocards | 1 | April 11th 07 07:59 PM |
Best Display for Laptop for Presentation | Chris[_3_] | Dell Computers | 2 | April 6th 07 12:53 AM |