Amazon Kindle for PC causes BSOD in Windows 8.1

G. Morgan brought next idea :
Eagle wrote:

G. Morgan explained :
Dustin wrote:

Jax, with the intelligence you can't display on a daily basis, I
wouldn't be smiling that much!


It's that retarded smile, ignorance is bliss. doop-de-doo

You'd do yourself a favor by not using that word "retarded". :/

I volunteer for a school for special kids.

Glad to read this.
My first born is [MR].

I call the kids "special people" (not directly to them) and they teach me
things about life in general. They don't have mean streaks, it's almost
like they are pure, like they never learned how to hate or be mean. They
just want hugs and someone to talk to. We are not allowed to give them
real hugs anymore, legal said it was a liability. :-(

Dustin explained :
Jax wrote in news:XnsA3FBE6DE2FFACJAX@
127.0.0.1:

And your useless picture doesn't tell me anything useful about
Hitachi disks. lol

I couldn't help but notice you tried spinning what he told you to
something else in another newsgroup. [g]

alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt

At least it appears to be on topic for that group.

"Dustin" wrote in message
. 233.145...

Take your own advice, stupid. Think before you hit reply and write
nonsense, lies, and, slime.




--
Why? You and morgan do it all the time.

On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 05:14:28 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:


Back to my challenge. Do you accept? Can you create a thread that does
not make anyone feel alienated and will be interesting to chat about?
Even BD can and does do that from time to time. You have not done it
once in years.

Never gonna happen, mate.



--
None are so hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they
are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by
masters who rule them with lies.
-Johann von Goethe

On 12/9/2014 8:44 AM, Aardvark wrote:
On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 05:14:28 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:


Back to my challenge. Do you accept? Can you create a thread that does
not make anyone feel alienated and will be interesting to chat about?
Even BD can and does do that from time to time. You have not done it
once in years.

Never gonna happen, mate.



Then again, one can never truly know who's written posts that appear
under the troll's "name".

On 12/9/2014 1:26 PM, Jax wrote:
SeaNymph wrote in
:

On 12/9/2014 8:44 AM, Aardvark wrote:
On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 05:14:28 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:


Back to my challenge. Do you accept? Can you create a thread
that does not make anyone feel alienated and will be interesting
to chat about? Even BD can and does do that from time to time.
You have not done it once in years.

Never gonna happen, mate.



Then again, one can never truly know who's written posts that
appear under the troll's "name".

Linda at least I don't pretend they're all my own work.... which I
imagine you do. Just saying!


Any post that appears under my nym was written by me unless I say
otherwise. And you do pretend they're your own work because you never
mention who actually wrote them until you get called out. Think about
that you lying troll.

LOL

On 12/9/2014 1:27 PM, Dustin wrote:
Jax wrote in
:

SeaNymph wrote in
:

On 12/9/2014 8:44 AM, Aardvark wrote:
On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 05:14:28 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:


Back to my challenge. Do you accept? Can you create a thread
that does not make anyone feel alienated and will be interesting
to chat about? Even BD can and does do that from time to time.
You have not done it once in years.

Never gonna happen, mate.



Then again, one can never truly know who's written posts that
appear under the troll's "name".

Linda at least I don't pretend they're all my own work.... which I
imagine you do. Just saying!

Another lie. You do claim them as your own work, unless/until one of
us finds out where the information really came from and brings to
everyones attention. THEN, you admit it's not yours and try to
deflect; as you're doing now.

That is exactly correct.

On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:12:57 PM UTC+8, RayLopez99 wrote:
On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:09:36 PM UTC+8, RayLopez99 wrote:
This thread was useful...note the two programs have been updated this

I think I might end up doing a clean reinstall of Windows 8.

However, going through this thread and reading between the lines: http://www.eightforums.com/performan...upt-files.html

I think I know maybe what happened. These problems showed up in Windows sometime after when I cloned a smaller WD HD (512 GB) onto a larger Seagate HD (1 TB). In theory it's not a problem, but in practice I think it confused Windows, which might have anti-piracy keys embedded in it that compound this problem. My OS is a genuine copy of Windows 8.1 running on a fairly new quad core PC.

The reason is that sfc /scannow finds numerous 'errors', not really errors, but it causes perpetual potential false positives when doing chkdsk and disk repair. Below are some of these 'errors' (in practice there's about 30 pages of this, I just picked some representative examples). You can 'fix' these errors by running chkdsk, and then do a HD image backup (I use Clonezilla), but, a few days or hours later, the errors reappear.

RL

sfc /scannow gives (sample output):

2014-11-26 18:46:08, Info CBS Session: 30411110_795857431 initialized by client WindowsUpdateAgent.
2014-11-26 18:46:08, Info CBS Failed to internally open package. [HRESULT = 0x800f0805 - CBS_E_INVALID_PACKAGE]


NEW POST ------------ 12/14/2014 -------------


I did a clean reinstall,the problem went away, until today, when Windows 8.1 would not boot and I had to do another reinstall (without formating). h E lp !! !!! meee... pA ul an d Fl asher ly... lol

My question is:

It seems the "Seagate 1TB" HDD is bad...but can that be? If I had the old Western Digital 500 MB HDD as "C", in November, and this Seagate 1Tb HDD as "D", back in November, and I did a clean reinstall around Thanksgiving Nov 25, but switched SATA3 drives (so the old Seagate "D" drive is now "C", and vice versa), is it possible that the old WD HDD can 'infect' the new drive with problems? I did a fast format of both drives in November (and deleted the old Windows), so the chances of a virus somehow living on the old drive and infecting the new drive are slim. Also I run MS Security Essentials, full scan, and it's not found a virus.

If my theory about the old drive somehow corrupting the new drive is true, or, equally (because I believe this is true) the Seagate 1 TB drive--the new 'c' drive,old 'd' drive--was defective when I purchased it this year (long story, but the merchant I bought it from sold it suspiciously quick, cheap and with a smirk on his face, and it did not have the original box, though it has warranty stickers on it (this being southeast Asia)--then is it possible that my November problem was caused by the Seagate drive (which at that time was drive "D", now it's system drive "C"). Any feedback appreciated. I've built many a PC from scratch and also code so I'm not a total noob..

PC is running Windows 8.1, legal version (ironically I had no problems with this same system --minus the 'new' and I think defective Seagate 1TB drive-- running a pirate version of Win7) and has mostly legal software save a suspect version of Visual Studio 2013, was built around 2011, i5-quad core, RAM memory is fine except when it is not seated properly (which often happens every few years, but I pop the case, reseat the memory, and the problem goes away--btw, can a memory chip not seated properly cause a HD error, as in CHKDSK error? Interesting if so...) and the BIOS is AMD's with the latest (as of last year) version reflashed into it (I did this after the clean reinstall in Nov. 25).

RL

CHKDSK error log file:

- Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"
- System
Provider Name="Chkdsk" /
EventID Qualifiers="0"26216/EventID
Level4/Level
Task0/Task
Keywords0x8000000000000/Keywords
TimeCreated SystemTime="2014-12-14T08:09:07.000000000Z" /
EventRecordID102/EventRecordID
ChannelApplication/Channel
ComputerI5_reinstall/Computer
Security /
/System
- EventData
DataChecking file system on C: Volume label is Seagate1TB. Stage 1: Examining basic file system structure ... Found corrupt basic file structure for "\Windows.old\Windows\WinSxS\X823AD~1.174 0x5,0x39b13" ... queued for offline repair. 448000 file records processed. File verification completed. 5203 large file records processed. 0 bad file records processed. Stage 2: Examining file name linkage ... Found an unneeded link ($FILE_NAME: "logo.contrast-white_scale-140.png") in index "$I30" of directory "\Windows.old\Windows\WinSxS\x86_microsoft-windows-

Unable to locate attribute of type 0xa0, lowest vcn 0x0, instance tag 0x2 in file 0x19b9. Deleted corrupt attribute list entry with type code 176 in file 236307. Unable to locate attribute of type 0xb0, lowest vcn 0x0, instance tag 0x3 in file 0x19b9. Unable to locate attribute with instance tag 0x4 and segment reference 0x90000000019b9. . CHKDSK is scanning unindexed files for reconnect to their original directory./Data
Binary00D60600B04105000D97090000000000A90100007B 00000 0000000000000/Binary
/EventData
/Event