If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AMD64 3200+ or P4Prescott
I dont know which one to take:AMD 64(not FX) 3200+ 1Mb cache.....or P4
3.2Ghz Prescott 1Mb cache 800Mhz BUS.... I dont want to overclock them.Generaly I want to se this processor for gameing.............help!!!!!!!!!! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Deda" wrote in message ... I dont know which one to take:AMD 64(not FX) 3200+ 1Mb cache.....or P4 3.2Ghz Prescott 1Mb cache 800Mhz BUS.... I dont want to overclock them.Generaly I want to se this processor for gameing.............help!!!!!!!!!! I personally would take the 64, they seem to be a bit better in the benchmarks. http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.c...d=1469&page=18 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Stolworthy wrote:
"Deda" wrote in message ... I dont know which one to take:AMD 64(not FX) 3200+ 1Mb cache.....or P4 3.2Ghz Prescott 1Mb cache 800Mhz BUS.... I dont want to overclock them.Generaly I want to se this processor for gameing.............help!!!!!!!!!! I personally would take the 64, they seem to be a bit better in the benchmarks. http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.c...d=1469&page=18 ....and it opens the door to the 64 Bit world, see http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/6...ds/upgrade.asp Gérard |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is it faster???
"Deda" wrote in message ... I dont know which one to take:AMD 64(not FX) 3200+ 1Mb cache.....or P4 3.2Ghz Prescott 1Mb cache 800Mhz BUS.... I dont want to overclock them.Generaly I want to se this processor for gameing.............help!!!!!!!!!! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Deda" wrote in message ... Is it faster??? "Deda" wrote in message ... I dont know which one to take:AMD 64(not FX) 3200+ 1Mb cache.....or P4 3.2Ghz Prescott 1Mb cache 800Mhz BUS.... I dont want to overclock them.Generaly I want to se this processor for gameing.............help!!!!!!!!!! Yes it is faster, than the P4 in just about every aspect a CPU can be tested in. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 15:21:14 -0400, Trent©
wrote: Yes it is faster, than the P4 in just about every aspect a CPU can be tested in. And burning up is one of them! lol Huh? It has a heat spreader. There should be lesser chance of CPU damage due to significantly lower energy usage, heat. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMD64 - How good are they? | Gojira | General | 1 | April 18th 04 11:30 PM |
Suggestions on Components for AMD64 System | Dan | General | 0 | February 27th 04 08:25 PM |
Overclocked 2500 Barton to 3200 using my old Crucial 2100 DDR | [email protected] | General | 5 | January 18th 04 09:01 AM |
AMD/Linux vs Intel/Microsoft | E | General | 64 | January 14th 04 01:50 PM |
OK deal on Kingston DDR 3200 memory | [email protected] | General | 0 | January 4th 04 11:50 AM |