Consumer Reports picks Dataproducts as the best Ink Refill System!!!

Consumer Reports picks Dataproducts as the best Ink Refill System!!!

FACT: ConsumerReports.org has several articles that talk negative
about after market ink refills and after market ink catridges.
However, they recommend Dataproducts for the best Ink Refill Systems.
Consumer Reports stated, "the Dataproducts (Automatic Ink Refill
System)..........represent significant savings over the HP. Its photo
quality, judged good, matched the OEM HP black 96/tri-color 97
combination." However, this product is only sold for HP and Lexmark.
Consumer Report is only talking about the Dataproducts automatic ink
refill system, and not their regular ink refills or their after-market
cartridges. (If you are interested in the detailed report,
ConsumerReports.org charges $5.99 for a 1 month subscribition. They
need to charge because the magazine is not supported by advertisers.)

WHY AFTER-MARKET INK COMPANIES DON'T WANT YOU TO READ THIS (FACT):
After market ink companies in general make their most money off after
market cartriges. Yes, they make money off ink refill systems, but
not as much. Consumer Reports actually stated, "Off-brand cartridges
often cost much less than brand-name cartridges. Based on our tests,
you'll probably find they're saving you little or no money when you
calculate per-photo costs." I personally remember my OEM cartridge
lasted longer then my after market cartridge.

WHY PEOPLE ON THE BULLETIN BOARDS HATE ME (THEORY): I have come to
believe that this bulletin board is run by people that have a
financial interest in either the 'printer companies that charge a lot
for OEM ink' or the 'after-market ink companies'. Therefore, you
will find a lot of post that hate me in general, because I'm endorsing
an item that will cause both companies to lose money. This thread
will not be moderated, and you will see people bashing me on the their
own post. However, can they back their bashing Opinions with Facts?

LINK THAT I WOULD NOT TRUST BECAUSE I BELIEVE THEY MIGHT HAVE A
FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THIS TOPIC.
http://www.neilslade.com/papers/inkjetstuff.html
http://www.nifty-stuff.com/forum/
http://www.trustedreviews.com/printe...1/The-Inkjet-I...
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,11...1/article.html

OPINION: You can save a lot of money on ink, and have good quality
prints. However the catch is you have to refill it yourself, and you
need a Lexmark or HP printer. If you choose to not refill it
yourself, you can go with the Kodak 5100, 5300, or 5500 printer.
(Read my article called, " Why I endorsed the Kodak 5100, 5300, & 5500
printer that everybody hates!!!"
http://groups.google.com/group/comp....25cd92272ded14)
I hope to follow up this article with some advice for Canon and Epson
refillers. If you are interested in buying the recommended product,
do a search with keyword: buy Dataproducts Automatic Ink Refill System.

Branwynn,

Thanks for confirming my article.

Stan

This whole article is an insult to anyone's intelligence. But then we
all know who put it up - several times today. Please do not respond to
it.

Branwynn wrote:
wrote in
ups.com:

Consumer Reports picks Dataproducts as the best Ink Refill System!!!




This whole article is an insult to anyone's intelligence. But then we
all know who put it up - several times today. Please do not respond to
it.

He has just made it to my kill file (again).

Frank,

sorry that this article is going to cause lost business to hobbicolors
ink.

Stan

wrote:

Frank,

sorry that this article is going to cause lost business to hobbicolors
ink.

Stan


Uhhh...who said I use hobbicolors, huh?
Frank

wrote:
snipped opinionated diatribe

WHY PEOPLE ON THE BULLETIN BOARDS HATE ME (THEORY): I have come to
believe that this bulletin board is run by people that have a
financial interest in either the 'printer companies that charge a lot
for OEM ink' or the 'after-market ink companies'. Therefore, you
will find a lot of post that hate me in general, because I'm endorsing
an item that will cause both companies to lose money. This thread
will not be moderated, and you will see people bashing me on the their
own post. However, can they back their bashing Opinions with Facts?

Stan, your "theory" has a lot of holes in it. To wit:

A. This is *not* a bulletin board. It is an unmoderated Usenet
newsgroup. It isn't "run" by anybody. Anybody can come here and post any
drivel they want to, and it will appear. That is not to say that people
here will choose to read it, and if they do, that they won't question
it, just as you have been doing with others' posts.

B. I can only speak for myself, but I don't "hate" you. I don't hate
anybody. I do believe you are perhaps the second-most misguided poster
here, but that's *your* problem, not mine. That is my opinion, based on
what you have revealed about your thought processes in your many posts
the last few days. I don't think anybody here "hates" you except for
maybe Frank, and that's only because he thinks you and Measekite are the
same person.

C. I seriously doubt that any of your little threads will cost anybody
any significant money, or gain any for anybody. None of us here has that
kind of influence. You need to get over yourself.

TJ

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

TJ wrote:
wrote:
snipped opinionated diatribe

WHY PEOPLE ON THE BULLETIN BOARDS HATE ME (THEORY): I have come to
believe that this bulletin board is run by people that have a
financial interest in either the 'printer companies that charge a lot
for OEM ink' or the 'after-market ink companies'. Therefore, you
will find a lot of post that hate me in general, because I'm endorsing
an item that will cause both companies to lose money. This thread
will not be moderated, and you will see people bashing me on the their
own post. However, can they back their bashing Opinions with Facts?

Stan, your "theory" has a lot of holes in it. To wit:

A. This is *not* a bulletin board. It is an unmoderated Usenet
newsgroup. It isn't "run" by anybody. Anybody can come here and post any
drivel they want to, and it will appear. That is not to say that people
here will choose to read it, and if they do, that they won't question
it, just as you have been doing with others' posts.

B. I can only speak for myself, but I don't "hate" you. I don't hate
anybody. I do believe you are perhaps the second-most misguided poster
here, but that's *your* problem, not mine. That is my opinion, based on
what you have revealed about your thought processes in your many posts
the last few days. I don't think anybody here "hates" you except for
maybe Frank, and that's only because he thinks you and Measekite are the
same person.

C. I seriously doubt that any of your little threads will cost anybody
any significant money, or gain any for anybody. None of us here has that
kind of influence. You need to get over yourself.

TJ

Nah TJ, I don't "hate" anybody either. What I "hate" is the deceiving
crap stan/mesaher****head/joe has posted and keeps on posting.
Unsubstantiated bs all from a person with absolutely no experience at
all using after market inks.
We know just how psychotic this person can become because we've all
witnessed just how demented he became in the past.
He offers nothing to this ng and has only been able to capture attention
and bandwidth.
Love & peace! :-)
Frank

TJ,

I do want to continue my research, but I'm stuck on the Canon and
Epson printers. Which refill ink brand (not after market cartridge)
would you recommend for the Canon printer? I have a Canon so I want
it for personal use. However, I also want the name of one for the
Epson printer. That is for my research.

Stan
ps. TJ, i like your advice. I take it as constructive criticism.
thanks...

wrote:
TJ,

I do want to continue my research, but I'm stuck on the Canon and
Epson printers. Which refill ink brand (not after market cartridge)
would you recommend for the Canon printer? I have a Canon so I want
it for personal use. However, I also want the name of one for the
Epson printer. That is for my research.

Stan
ps. TJ, i like your advice. I take it as constructive criticism.
thanks...



Oh, let me guess measher****head/stan/joe's next move.
You recommend hobbicolors...he pretends like he calls them up and he
then posts back here that they (hobbicolors) WON'T REVEL WHO
MANUFACTURERS THEIR INK!
They he starts in on the old "they won't tell you who...bla bla bla..."
Well, we all know where this is going don't we?
Hasn’t this been this trolls mantra from the beginning!

IMO TJ, I wouldn't be complicit in enabling this troll with his charade
any further.

One big clue he inadvertently dropped today is that he knows I use
hobbicolors ink...which he (under the guise of stan) never asked me
which ink I use and I never told him. He slipped up! Cats out of the bag!
Gottcha!
I am 100% sure that stan/measher****head/joe are all one in the same,
psychotic individual.
Frank

One big clue he inadvertently dropped today is that he knows I use
hobbicolors ink...which he (under the guise of stan) never asked me
which ink I use and I never told him. He slipped up! Cats out of the bag!
Gottcha!


Frank,
I'm sorry that you are upset. However, to answer your question...
this is how I found out......On Sun, Aug 27 2006 7:37 you posted this
info on the bulletin board. (This is only one of your many posting
you did to promote hobbicolors. BTW - I might use Hobbicolors for my
Canon refill, I'm just still doing the research.)

THIS IS WHAT YOU WROTE.........
You need to direct all of your purchasing questions to:

Hobbicolors: 1-408-926-6008

or email them at:






HERE IS THE LINK.........
http://groups.google.com/group/comp....a351e8a351aa05


PS. You might want to consider taking some anger management classes.