If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
anybody remember "high-end desktops" in the 1990s?
When I was at uni, the department had some SPARCstations and AlphaStations
with 512 MiB of RAM. I got a job with a geophysical company and they were running Red Hat Linux (the really old stuff before they added "Enterprise" to the name and started the version numbers all over). They had brand new Pentium III PCs, but I can't remember the other specs. Windows 95 was limited to 768 MiB, but Windows NT4 could have done 4 GiB of RAM. I can't recall seeing such a beast in those days. Maybe aerospace and oil companies would have had some expensive workstations for their boffins. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
anybody remember "high-end desktops" in the 1990s?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
anybody remember "high-end desktops" in the 1990s?
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:56:01 +0200, Filip454
wrote: They had brand new Pentium III PCs, but I can't remember the other specs. Windows 95 was limited to 768 MiB, but Windows NT4 could have done 4 GiB of RAM. I can't recall seeing such a beast in those days. Maybe aerospace and oil companies would have had some expensive workstations for their boffins. Was that in 1999? More like late 90s then. All I remember is non-stop upgrades from 4.77Mhz 8088's and onwards, which was what I first started to build computers, personally, probably slowing down on plenty of build, flip-'n-sell, update and resell boxes, around 1GHz or early AMD XP CPUs. I sold my first XT to the owner an electronics repair store. It was then made by a car manufacturer now, and I'd heavily modified it upon the realization I'd be needing more -- newer, faster and better -- to go where I was going. The thing I remember about Windows 95 was hardware available at the time. I suppose it was no less was buggy than at times before, but Windows 95 was neither anything to write home about in terms of stability, at least on MBs and components then available;- In fact, if anything, W95 was more advanced than an industry counterpart of hardware. It wasn't until Windows 98, probably SE, that I can remember remarking to myself, how much better hardware had become in terms of improved wider reliability and positive performance. Perhaps that would be as if running Microsoft NT core technology for the first time, but in terms of a relative perspective for software, with NT's then new "crash-guard" which helped a lot in terms of errantly-written programming, or, more importantly, with a more polished and reliable computer field state available, by the time of XP, as compared to 98. (I never ran with an interim NT4.0 system for any experience there.) It was "my market" largely up unit then. I remember when BestBuy and CompUSA began by introducing a likes of E-Machines. I could see people changing, their excitement leaving, before a face of mass retailing, when the a prospect of owning a computer wasn't exciting anymore. People became less sincere, didn't need to at least appear to be, with the assurance an affordable chain-store computer brand. Researching components parts for build assembly, promoting them was fine up until then. After, I realized it never was as important, as it seemed to me at the time, when people didn't have a cheaper E-Machine option. I was just fulfilling a cheap service on good builds, because they knew they'd get a good deal without anything else that affordable available then available to them (a custom Dell or Gateway build was Big Bucks). They had their own reasons indeed for owning one, though, in a manner of time and manner of "going online", it was then less about a broader cross-section of what computers are capable. Same as it ever was, IOW, a reductive convenience of greatest applicability. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
anybody remember "high-end desktops" in the 1990s?
For me, I had to keep upgrading because of computer games. I don't play
them anymore so I still use my decade old desktops. :P http://zimage.com/~ant/antfarm/about/toys.html for my list. -- TGIGF! Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org / / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.ma.cx. Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail. | |o o| | \ _ / ( ) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
anybody remember "high-end desktops" in the 1990s?
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:41:45 -0500, NT (Ant) wrote:
For me, I had to keep upgrading because of computer games. I don't play them anymore so I still use my decade old desktops. :P http://zimage.com/~ant/antfarm/about/toys.html for my list. Games is entirely another story. A story with even less leeway. Don't get me wrong, but the game industry is about a huge representation when you walk through Mr. Joe Blow's Average Household Door. But, there's also another reason why you don't see CompUSA and E-Machines anymore. There was saying, a realization in those stores among people selling their cheap pre-assembled builds. It was a saying said with sarcasm: Games make or break 'em. Later, though, past W95, W98 -- it was the Golden Age of Computers running XP -- either for 1) games or 2) desktop PC social media -- before Dick Tracy Android wrist watches for cloud subscriptions became [what it was intended] a vulgarisation of computing. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
anybody remember "high-end desktops" in the 1990s?
On Friday, April 19, 2019 at 9:24:06 AM UTC-4, Flasherly wrote:
All I remember is non-stop upgrades from 4.77Mhz 8088's and onwards, which was what I first started to build computers, personally, probably slowing down on plenty of build, flip-'n-sell, update and resell boxes, around 1GHz or early AMD XP CPUs. I sold my first XT to the owner an electronics repair store. It was then made by a car manufacturer now, and I'd heavily modified it upon the realization I'd be needing more -- newer, faster and better -- to go where I was going. Yes, I did the same thing, buying DC computers from the government and flipping them, about the same time Michael Dell was doing that, but without his success. My business partner was skimming off the top and I decided to get into a white collar profession which was more lucrative. But what might have been... RL |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
anybody remember "high-end desktops" in the 1990s?
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 12:24:10 -0700 (PDT), RayLopez99
wrote: Yes, I did the same thing, buying DC computers from the government and flipping them, about the same time Michael Dell was doing that, but without his success. My business partner was skimming off the top and I decided to get into a white collar profession which was more lucrative. But what might have been... - I was selling to a ready enough market, except it wasn't as much profits. I'd basically break even over the momentum of advancements in technology. A free roller-coaster ride: learn to buy both correctly for expanding capabilities, as well applicability in the latest advancements. Always save receipts. There were lots of people interested in buying in on that. As well interesting situations where there would benefit from an upgrade. Helped one guy, rubbing elbows at the state capitol, who received regular digital death registrations. The storage considerations were unique, but he knew exactly what to do, beyond that, in finding undeclared monies for probate purposes. Others could be less appreciable, less specialized suites of office computers, networks and terminals, where intent and goodwill might go somewhat farther overall. But, yes, I also been in the large rooms stacked with government computers left from updates for easy pickings. All I wanted, though, was to build the greatest possible computer, see how it works, and sell it to cover what doing it over again by then entailed when new technological challenges changed to enter into the market. Like I said, I got away with enjoying it for some time, more or less until CompUSA and BestBuy entered a ready PC market of convenience for dealings with people other than me. Then they'd come up to me to me with their E-Machine(TM) hard and software issues. I'd shrug my shoulders: My research covered both the hardware, to apply for that contingency, as well as software. Why would someone think I'd find of interest researching crap that went into their pre-assembled, cat-hairball of a build, because they found a storefront cover appeal more appealing than my build? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"What is HAMR and How Does It Enable the High-Capacity Needs of theFuture?" | Lynn McGuire[_3_] | Storage (alternative) | 6 | December 18th 17 05:12 AM |
Remember This Oldie? "Have You Ever Seen A Duck Dancing? (I Have)" | Nathan Hale | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | February 22nd 17 03:59 AM |
" high definition bus audio" driver is missing A8N-E | marcgrn | Asus Motherboards | 2 | March 16th 11 09:10 PM |
Dimension 8300: Can it support "high density" memory? | Thomas G. Marshall | Dell Computers | 28 | November 22nd 07 03:31 PM |
HP5440 - "shadowed" text when printing in normal and high-qualitymodes | KS | Printers | 0 | December 20th 05 03:35 PM |