Farcry PS3.0 garbage: Why does Nvidia insist on lying at every opportunity?

So everyone that cares, vote this November, or STFU. Simple, really.

Konx Om Pax,
Ade


"Darthy" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:44:20 GMT, "K" wrote:


"Darthy" Remember: In the USA - it is illegal to draw or write about
Heir
Bush in a negative way. The police or SS are called...bla,bla,bla...

Hello Pinhead, you don't read much do you? The liberal hate-mongering
media
spouts anti-Bush vomit every day.

uh... do you have the ability to debate what I am saying?

Truth - the enemy of Facists.

Look up "facists" "liberal" and "conservative" in a dictionary. (if
you know what a dictionary is). here, make it easy for your one cell
brain. www.dictionary.com

The USA was about freedom of thought. You pricks picked on Clinton
for 8 years... so much vile hate. But if someone dare speaks ill of
your fuhrer, it becomes all WRONG and such people should be shot.

what county are you living in?

Remember: In the USA - it is illegal to draw or write about Heir Bush in a
negative way. The police or SS are called.

15yr old boy in Washington was disciplined for drawing such images.

God bless the land of the free. Where you can burn the Constitution...
Ashcroft does it every day.

Andrew MacLean wrote:

Except that it isn't Bush trying to re-instate the draft, it is a
low-handed, cynical attempt by the Democrats to make it look like he is
and to increase projected costs for the military.

House bill, HR 163, is co-sponsored by Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Washington
and Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y.

In the Senate, Fritz Hollings, D-S.C., is the lone sponsor of S 89.

All of these bills are designed to make the average American nervous
about a possible draft right before an election, and by extension, blame
Bush and his administration for them. In fact, both bills are being
rejected by the Bush administration.

As for Bush circumventing the constitution, give me a break. The truth
remains that Saddam was in violation of numerous UN resolutions, and was a
staunch supporter of terrorism. Remember that he gave 25,000 USD grants
to all Palestinian families that sent their sons to die in the name of
Allah and the death of Israelis. WMD was an unfortunate approach for
Bush to take on the issue.

With regards to the police action, you are absolutely correct. Americans
and those countries that are deep down afraid of their power are the
reason for the current death toll in Iraq, and Bush is to blame for
caving into their demands and paranoia. The US should stop giving a ****
what the international community says and nuke Fallujah. The way I see
it, it is time for the Iraqis to stand up for their own country and stop
leaving it to others. If they don't want to get bombed, then clear out
the insurgents themselves. It's amazing that these lowlifes have
suddenly found their courage to fight the USA when they cowered in fear
under Saddam. The only reason is that they know the US will show them
mercy that Saddam never would.

All very well and from my point of view the removal of Saddam was justified
by all means. However, the whole affair somehow smells like an 'war for the
black gold' in the first place. Was Bush comercialised by the oil lobby?
Questions that should be answered..

/2cents

On Sun, 02 May 2004 12:24:48 GMT, "K" wrote:


"Clark" wrote in message ...
Yes He fought back but being true to his style he started a war with the wrong
people! What did Iraq have to do with 9/11? Lets see? which President gave us 8
years of jobs, a multi billion surplus. And who is the cowboy that spent it?
Nothing wrong with a blow job, I bet Lara doesn't swallow.

In 2001 Al Gore, John Kerry, Bill Clinton, Tom Dashell and other Democrats supported action against Iraq. The CIA and FBI reported Iraq was supporting and funding Ai Quida training camps.

er... Al Gore had said that starting a fake war in Iraq would be a
mistake. I don't recall what Bill Clinton said, if anything.

Information about Iraq was a lie.... I thought there was WMD in Iraq -
and I thought it was still a lame excuse, but if he had them - sure.
But the whole thing was a lie. Read the books, people have been
saying THIS ADMIN has been wanting to attack Iraq since day one and
this is before we fired the first bullet.... learn!

So instead, we have created more ****ed off muslims who will be doing
sissy terrorist attacks against the modern world (Terrorist, terrorism
are proper words. Terror is not. But when you have a dumb **** in
the white house, our education sinks further. You learn to speak in
elementary or middle school...

RIGHT: He is doing a terrorist act.
WRONG: He is doing a terror attack.
RIGHT: We are in Terror.

See?

Oh yeah... lets not forget these other FACTS:

1 - Cheney, one of HIS trials - the judge is a friend of his and they
are regular fishing buddies.... oh how nice. That is NOT legit. Its
improper of the courts, the govt and the people to allow it.

It's like have a Nazi SS dude trying to procecute Adolf Hitler in
court.

2 - Top level in the Bush office purposly BLEW the cover of a secret
agent because her husband said that the Admins' proof of WMD was
bull****. So they commited treason and put her life in danger. Her
job was to fight terrorism... but her cover is blown and is not longer
a usable agent. Guess whose stonewalling that investigation?

Who? Be honest... I know, its a hard thing for you.


Its rather funny that Bush camp says bad things about Kerry's military
record... uh, he has one. Bush doesn't - he went AWOL, never served
combat duty and purposly trained to fly a jet the forces where already
phasing out. DUH. And in case you're going to talk about the recent
group of vets who says that Kerry sucks... keep in mind who supports
this group... they say everyone sucks who isn't Bush. DUH.


So whose side is Bush on? Not America's.
Remember: In the USA - it is illegal to draw or write about Heir Bush in a negative way. The police or SS are called.

15yr old boy in Washington was disciplined for drawing such images.

God bless the land of the free. Where you can burn the Constitution... Ashcroft does it every day.

On Sun, 02 May 2004 12:55:21 GMT, "K" wrote:

uh... do you have the ability to debate what I am saying?

To debate a pinhead who does not understand the law is futile. Hey dumb-ass,

debate... to hard for what little brain cells you have. Typical.
Thats the easy answer... oh yeah, retardo in the white house couldn't
debate either...

it's not illegal write about the President of the USA. As I pointed out

Its looking like that.

earlier it's done every day. Hence my correct observation that you don't
know how to read or you haven't progressed beyond a first grade primer!

Funny... bush seems to have the inability to read is own speeches on
the monitor... so thats funny coming from you.

Remember: In the USA - it is illegal to draw or write about Heir Bush in a negative way. The police or SS are called.

15yr old boy in Washington was disciplined for drawing such images.

God bless the land of the free. Where you can burn the Constitution... Ashcroft does it every day.