If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
Really ? And what makes you come to that conclusion ?
Perfectly average? Just like you ?? Your moniker betrays your pomposity. Try applying to Anandtech as a reviewer some day. Or to Ars Technica as a journalist. John Lewis I'm sure Mr.E.Solved won't sleep tonight now. It just breaks out hearts when some non-entity like you blows through the n/g cross-posting and talking out of his ass. Perhaps you can post some irrelevant gem again in, say, 2011 or 2012. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
Somewhere on teh intarweb "John Lewis" typed:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:34:37 -0400, "Mr.E Solved!" wrote: John Lewis wrote: The misfortune happened at Anandtech in extreme stress testing.. Probably the most respected PC hardware review site in the world for its technical authority. You are bonkers if that is what you think. More so if you are in any way affiliated with that site or its advertisers. Not at all. However, I do happen to be a hardware engineer specializing in computer-based professional technical instrumentation, so maybe I do have some ability to discern technical competence in this field Or not. IMEE when people start claiming quals without backing the claims up it's usually a defence mechanism and chances are that it's bull****. Anyone with half a brain (or more) would have just posted this to alt.comp.harware.overclocking. After all, if there was one group where this post would have been right on topic and open to knowledgable discussion that's the one. By their actions you will know them. -- Shaun. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:14:31 GMT, (John Lewis)
wrote: I give up what is a "longer-term early-failure"?? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
"noname" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:14:31 GMT, (John Lewis) wrote: I give up what is a "longer-term early-failure"?? The OP |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:05:11 GMT, "alanrco"
wrote: hmm... I brought my complete PC recently Overclocked proccessor (quad 2.4 OC to 3.2) and OC Vid as advertised. Wonder how mine will fare over the 12 months that is a legal requirement for warranty on goods sold in the UK. As a unit I've been informed, this would take precedent over individual item warranty requirements laid down by say, Intel or Nvidia. Also the selling company of the PC has the liability over individual parts manufacture. Interesting If you managed to overclock without raising any voltages higher than Intel's/nVidia's/ memory-supplier recommended maximum, the core temp of the CPU does not exceed a conservative 60 degrees C and the GPU core does not exceed a conservative 80 degrees C while running the stress benchmarks, you should be in great shape. John Lewis Alan |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:42:09 -0400, noname wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:14:31 GMT, (John Lewis) wrote: I give up what is a "longer-term early-failure"?? .... in the context of the time to failure in the Anandtech article.... next question? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:13:24 GMT, "Augustus"
wrote: "noname" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:14:31 GMT, (John Lewis) wrote: I give up what is a "longer-term early-failure"?? The OP I was just passing along the Anandtech blog as a friendly warning for those far less knowledgeable about 45nm technology than yourself. You do work for one of Intel's process-evaluation group no doubt? John Lewis |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
I was just passing along the Anandtech blog as a friendly warning for
those far less knowledgeable about 45nm technology than yourself. You do work for one of Intel's process-evaluation group no doubt? John Lewis You delusions about your vast and far reaching knowledge regarding "45nm technology" is of no consequence to me. You don't know me, or anyone else who posts here on a regular basis. So don't presume to. I don't give a **** if you invented the internet along with your unique ability to "discern technical competence". I put you in the same league as Skybuck and DaveW. Actually, I take that back. They do have some redeeming humour qualities they are unaware of. You are a just a puffed up, self styled "expert" with zero credibilty. A usenet search of your postings speaks volumes about your expertise, sources and knowledge base. Like the one back in Feb where you told First of One that the 8800GTX was an "archaic" technology. Of course, since you're a long time regular, unlike me who's just a passing newbie and and have just discovered usenet. You still haven't figured out how to post to just one group either. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:42:09 -0400, noname wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:14:31 GMT, (John Lewis) wrote: I give up what is a "longer-term early-failure"?? That would imply that you would reach the parts Mean Time Before Failure, but still might have a servicable life. Might be an acceptable risk for a gamer... Just as an example using random numbers: Suppose the part has a MTBF of 10,000 hours. A gamer wants some extra speed, knows he's not going to use that CPU for more than a couple years and overclocks it, lessening the CPU's life to 7000 hours. That would be a longer term early failure. Tim |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
"John Lewis" wrote in message ... On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:42:09 -0400, noname wrote: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:14:31 GMT, (John Lewis) wrote: I give up what is a "longer-term early-failure"?? ... in the context of the time to failure in the Anandtech article.... next question? Here's a tip. If you use zero volts the CPU will last a lot longer than the estimated MTBF! g |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !! | John Lewis | Asus Motherboards | 21 | May 12th 08 10:12 AM |
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !! | John Lewis | Nvidia Videocards | 25 | May 12th 08 10:12 AM |
Will Sriker Extreme 680i SLI support upcoming Wolfdale and Yorkfield 45nm processors? | slipknot | Asus Motherboards | 6 | January 11th 08 03:20 PM |
45nm Penryn (Core2Quad) hit by erratum too | Yousuf Khan | General | 1 | December 25th 07 12:00 PM |
45nm Penryn (Core2Quad) hit by erratum too | Yousuf Khan | Intel | 1 | December 25th 07 12:00 PM |