If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Amd 6000+ cpu. Which motherboard for Win7 compatible
As in subject i'm searching a motherboard compatible with Amd
6000+ processor for Win 7 installation. Now this cpu is installed on AsRock Am2nf6g vsta motherboard but you cannot install Win 7 O.S. because you get Bsod just installation finishes. Which other motherboard can I use using the same ram as well? -- 'Za Fo'! ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Amd 6000+ cpu. Which motherboard for Win7 compatible
Freejazz wrote:
As in subject i'm searching a motherboard compatible with Amd 6000+ processor for Win 7 installation. Now this cpu is installed on AsRock Am2nf6g vsta motherboard but you cannot install Win 7 O.S. because you get Bsod just installation finishes. Which other motherboard can I use using the same ram as well? So you change the BIOS setting of the SATA ports and try again. The BSOD has a STOP code. Write down that code and look it up. http://aumha.org/a/stop.htm Your error is "7B Inaccessible boot volume". The boot volume is inaccessible, because the built-in driver is not working for some reason. Try setting the SATA ports to IDE in the BIOS, and try booting. It's also possible you were previously using RAID, RAID metadata is left on the disk, and the installation is confused and thinks the setup uses RAID. Now, whether you have a full set of drivers for that motherboard and Windows 7, is another matter. If the board was around in the Vista era, the chances are it does have drivers. If the board pre-dates Vista, then driver support could be poor. ******* As far as finding a motherboard at retail, you might be around two years out of date. Maybe Ebay will have something. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Amd 6000+ cpu. Which motherboard for Win7 compatible
Paul ha scritto:
Thank you, Paul!! So you change the BIOS setting of the SATA ports and try again. The pc is not mine. But next friday i will try... The BSOD has a STOP code. Write down that code and look it up. http://aumha.org/a/stop.htm Your error is "7B Inaccessible boot volume". The bsod is following: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7365479cww...14152.jpg?dl=0 The boot volume is inaccessible, because the built-in driver is not working for some reason. Try setting the SATA ports to IDE in the BIOS, and try booting. It's also possible you were previously using RAID, RAID metadata is left on the disk, and the installation is confused and thinks the setup uses RAID. [Cut] ******* As far as finding a motherboard at retail, you might be around two years out of date. Maybe Ebay will have something. I have found a AsRock (K10N78) with Win7 certified motherboard ( The cost is about 70Eur but if i can use my old motherboard would be better..:-) -- 'Za Fo'! ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Amd 6000+ cpu. Which motherboard for Win7 compatible
Freejazz wrote:
Paul ha scritto: Thank you, Paul!! So you change the BIOS setting of the SATA ports and try again. The pc is not mine. But next friday i will try... The BSOD has a STOP code. Write down that code and look it up. http://aumha.org/a/stop.htm Your error is "7B Inaccessible boot volume". The bsod is following: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7365479cww...14152.jpg?dl=0 The boot volume is inaccessible, because the built-in driver is not working for some reason. Try setting the SATA ports to IDE in the BIOS, and try booting. It's also possible you were previously using RAID, RAID metadata is left on the disk, and the installation is confused and thinks the setup uses RAID. [Cut] ******* As far as finding a motherboard at retail, you might be around two years out of date. Maybe Ebay will have something. I have found a AsRock (K10N78) with Win7 certified motherboard ( The cost is about 70Eur but if i can use my old motherboard would be better..:-) Congratulations. A STOP code not on the unofficial list of stop codes :-) They made a thread here for it. http://www.sevenforums.com/crash-loc...oubleshtg.html Now, what is interesting in that thread, is one individual feels he's seen this on both AMD and Intel processors. And that tells you the OS is contributing to this problem, as well as hardware. It's unlikely that both company have made a mistake in their interrupt routing logic. This smells like a Microsoft problem. While you could certainly consider the "theme" of their thread, I'm more interested in how the hardware could possibly be contributing to this. Some people have tried returning their CPU under warranty, to fix it. I'm sure that pleases the support staff at AMD and Intel to no end. On multiple core processors, there is an IOAPIC, and the capability exists to "steer" interrupts. There is a crude timer, probably more than a 20 year old design, which is emulated in chipsets, and it is used for things like clock tick interrupts. It's possible the hardware is configured at some point, to steer that regularly occurring interrupt to a certain core. (This can even be changed on-the-fly, and that aspect of it, could be indeed how the interrupt is getting lost. Maybe the clock tick interrupt is asserted at the same instant as the IOAPIC is changed.) If IOAPIC is disabled, then one core ends up handling all the interrupts. Steering is effectively disabled. Now, to screw up that option, one analysis of a bugcheck and memory.dmp showed that Core 0 actually missed the clock tick interrupt. So even if IOAPIC was disabled, on that particular CPU/motherboard combo, it might not have helped. That result tells me, that disabling IOAPIC and steering all interrupts to Core 0, doesn't seem to help. The Am2nf6g-VSTA in question is a bit weird. The documentation is dated 2006 and the BIOS trumpets "ACPI 1.1 support". I have a motherboard from 2003 with ACPI 2.0 support. I don't understand why Asrock was in a celebratory mood when they wrote that. As they're behind the time. And that just might possibly be contributing to the problem. And the way that BIOS updates work, baseline features like that are *NEVER* changed on BIOS updates. If the BIOS started with a crusty ancient code, it stays that way. BIOS fixes involve things like adding new CPU microcode patch files, or getting the BIOS to recognize CPUs with new family codes. They would not add ACPI 2.0 support on a whim. I downloaded the manual, and you have a basic CPU voltage setting. You could try adjusting that. There is no "Plug and Play OS" [No] to set. There is no IOAPCI standard setting to play with. There is a "Dual Core Support" [Enabled/disabled] setting, but I would want a backup of the OS partition if fooling with that. If the system was healthy, you could use something like HALu to change the HAL as a function of that Dual Core Support setting. Such a setting may or may not include disabling IOAPIC. Enabling Watchdog hardware on CPUs is always dangerous. And now you can see why. On the one hand, a watchdog detects hardware issues (or software bugs). But if the user has perfectly usable hardware, and it keeps BSODing because of this stupid feature, that user would be justifiably outraged. I used to sit in front of a piece of hardware at work that had Watchdog enabled, and it used to spray error messages on the screen continuously. And I was expected to type commands into that hardware, and ignore the constant scrolling down the screen, caused by the Watchdog being enabled. There were some days, I could have taken a hammer to that piece of hardware. But, they were paying me, so I had to put up with it :-( Another thing. That motherboard has several "Spread Spectrum" settings. Try disabling those. In an attempt to see if running the thing plesiochronous helps. The idea is, the various parts of the system are locked to canonical clock values, and only have phase differences, and possibly randomly occurring conditions (like this one) will behave differently as a result of changing the setting. The purpose of enabling Spread Spectrum is to beat FCC Part 15 compliance, so you can disable it without affecting hardware operation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plesiochronous_system Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Amd 6000+ cpu. Which motherboard for Win7 compatible
I'm unsure of what CPU you have, but I'm guessing is a socket AM2?
Consider this board: http://www.asrock.com/mb/NVIDIA/N68C...Specifications * It explicitly lists a couple of Athlon 64 X2 CPUs (ADV6000IAA5DO and ADV6000IAA5DO) as explicitly compatible. I how your CPU is 95W. * It has a couple of DDR2 slots, so it might not be able to utilize all of your RAM if you have all 4 slots filled on the AM2NF6G-VSTA * It is OS compliant for all Windows from XP to 8. And, you can buy it a newegg: ASRock N68C-GS4 FX $50 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813157581 On 4/15/2015 5:48 PM, Freejazz wrote: As in subject i'm searching a motherboard compatible with Amd 6000+ processor for Win 7 installation. Now this cpu is installed on AsRock Am2nf6g vsta motherboard but you cannot install Win 7 O.S. because you get Bsod just installation finishes. Which other motherboard can I use using the same ram as well? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Amd 6000+ cpu. Which motherboard for Win7 compatible
Grinder ha scritto:
I'm unsure of what CPU you have, but I'm guessing is a socket AM2? Consider this board: http://www.asrock.com/mb/NVIDIA/N68C...Specifications * It explicitly lists a couple of Athlon 64 X2 CPUs (ADV6000IAA5DO and ADV6000IAA5DO) as explicitly compatible. I how your CPU is 95W. Thank you for reply!! The consumption of processor is 125W and i think that this motherboard not be able to support the cpu.. -- 'Za Fo'! ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Amd 6000+ cpu. Which motherboard for Win7 compatible
Freejazz wrote:
Grinder ha scritto: I'm unsure of what CPU you have, but I'm guessing is a socket AM2? Consider this board: http://www.asrock.com/mb/NVIDIA/N68C...Specifications * It explicitly lists a couple of Athlon 64 X2 CPUs (ADV6000IAA5DO and ADV6000IAA5DO) as explicitly compatible. I how your CPU is 95W. Thank you for reply!! The consumption of processor is 125W and i think that this motherboard not be able to support the cpu.. In some table I was looking at (support.asus.com , technical inquiry, cpu support), there were three entries for 6000+. One for a high power version (125W), one for lower power version (95W). It's possible the third was a different die revision level. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this PSU compatible with my motherboard? | BrockLanders | Homebuilt PC's | 3 | August 31st 07 06:31 PM |
Dell Inspiron 6000 Motherboard | ljo | Dell Computers | 4 | August 26th 07 02:39 AM |
The best motherboard for the AMD 6000 CPU | [email protected] | Asus Motherboards | 0 | June 14th 07 08:05 PM |
is this used motherboard compatible? | [email protected] | Dell Computers | 24 | July 6th 06 08:12 PM |
what motherboard is compatible with an amd 2200? | Ryan | General | 12 | February 18th 04 12:10 AM |